Executive Scoreboard Board viewVision 2030
Approvals — actual vs target Monthly cumulative
Maturity Uplift Portfolio avg /5, last 8Q
Program Health — RAG by dimension
Localization Board Board viewVision 2030
Maturity vs Localization Bubble = award value
Saudi Content by Region SAR M
Localization by Tech Module Top & Bottom
| Module | Suppliers | Loc % | Δ vs Q |
|---|
Top 10 Suppliers by Saudi-Content SAR M
| Supplier | Sector | Award | Loc % | Saudi $ |
|---|
Active Assessments Suppliers view
89 assessments in flight across 7 workflow stages · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Wave 4
Stage 7 lanes
Sector 6 lanes
Assessor 8 lanes
Tier 3 lanes
Region 5 lanes
Template 5 lanes
Priority 3 lanes
In Flight
89
of 142 total suppliers
Avg Progress
64%
+3 pts vs last month
Avg Lead Time
82 days
SLA 90 days
Due This Week
14
4 site visits scheduled
Overdue
7
3 in scoring stage
Awaiting Review
12
SAMI sign-off queue
Invited
14
Tabuk Precision Ltd.
Aerostructures · CNC machining
NEW
📅 Invited Aug 6FA
Arabia Defense Optics
Avionics · Optical systems
NEW
📅 Invited Aug 4OK
Al-Kharj Wire & Cable
Avionics · Wire harness
📅 Invited Aug 2FA
Najd Composites Co.
Aerostructures · Composites
📅 Invited Aug 1RS
Questionnaire
18
Riyadh Electronics
C4I · Software dev.
⏰ Due Aug 12MG
Faisal Aero Mfg.
Aerostructures · Sheet metal
📅 Due Aug 20RS
Jeddah Marine Systems
Naval · Hydraulics
MP-05 gap
⚠ 4 days lateFA
Dammam Steel Works
Land · Sheet metal
📅 Due Aug 22OK
Yanbu Defense Ind.
Munitions · CNC machining
📅 Due Aug 25MG
Documents
15
Wahaj Defense Ind.
Avionics · Wire harness
OCR 92%
📅 Due Aug 18RS
NADIA Systems
C4I · Avionics Elec.
⏰ Due Aug 11FA
Al-Hejaz Metals
Land · Sheet metal
MP-02 gap
⚠ 6 days lateMG
Buraidah Precision
Aerostructures · CNC machining
📅 Due Aug 24OK
Site Visit
11
Taibah Arms Mfg.
Munitions · Hydraulics
🗓️ Aug 10
⏰ In 2 daysRS
Abha Composites
Aerostructures · Composites
🗓️ Aug 13
📅 In 5 daysFA
Jubail Petrochem Ind.
Naval · CNC machining
🗓️ Aug 14
📅 In 6 daysMG
Hail Aerospace
Avionics · PCB assembly
🗓️ Aug 17
📅 In 9 daysOK
Scoring
10
Advanced Electronics
Avionics · PCB assembly
⚠ 2 days lateRS
Riyadh Cyber Systems
C4I · Software dev.
📅 Due Aug 21MG
Al-Qassim Munitions
Munitions · Sheet metal
⏰ Due Aug 13FA
KAEC Marine
Naval · Hydraulics
⚠ 5 days lateOK
SAMI Review
12
Zamil Aerospace
Aerostructures · MRO Services
Review
📅 Due Aug 15MG
SASO Defense
Land · CNC machining
Review
⏰ Due Aug 12RS
Alsalam Aircraft
Aerostructures · MRO Services
Review
📅 Due Aug 19FA
Middle East Battery
Land · Hydraulics
Review
📅 Due Aug 23OK
Approved
9
SAMI Advanced Manuf.
Aerostructures · CNC machining
Tier 1
✅ Aug 6MG
Al-Rajhi Steel Ind.
Land · Sheet metal
Tier 2
✅ Aug 5FA
Peninsula Munitions
Munitions · CNC machining
Tier 1
✅ Aug 3RS
Nile Sat & Comms
C4I · Avionics Elec.
Tier 2
✅ Jul 30OK
89 active assessments · grouped by Stage
Sort: Due date ▾ · Rows per page 25 ▾
| Supplier | Sector | Stage | Template | Tier | Region | Assessor | Progress | Due | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wahaj Composites | Aerostructures | Invited | T1 Screen | Tier 1 | Yanbu | N. Al-Fahad | 4 % | Aug 22 | Normal |
| NADIA Aerospace | Aerostructures | Invited | Onboarding | Tier 2 | Riyadh | N. Al-Fahad | 8 % | Sep 05 | Normal |
| Riyadh Aerodynamics | Aerostructures | Questionnaire | Onboarding | Tier 2 | Riyadh | N. Al-Fahad | 32 % | Sep 05 | Normal |
| Al-Kharj Composites | Aerostructures | Questionnaire | Onboarding | Tier 2 | Al-Kharj | M. George | 28 % | Sep 05 | Elevated |
| Jeddah Precision Works | Aerostructures | Documents | Onboarding | Tier 2 | Jeddah | M. George | 48 % | Sep 05 | Normal |
| Taibah Technologies | C4I | Documents | T1 Screen | Tier 1 | Madinah | R. Al-Qahtani | 52 % | Aug 22 | Normal |
| Peninsula Aero Systems | Aerostructures | Site Visit | On-site Kit | Tier 2 | Dhahran | N. Al-Fahad | 58 % | Aug 13 • 2 d | Critical |
| Tabuk Metal Forming | Land | Site Visit | On-site Kit | Tier 2 | Tabuk | N. Al-Fahad | 62 % | Aug 14 | Elevated |
| Al-Salam Aerospace | Aerostructures | Scoring | Re-cert | Tier 1 | Riyadh | A. Al-Shehri | 78 % | Aug 18 | Normal |
| Advanced Electronics Co. | C4I | Scoring | Onboarding | Tier 1 | Riyadh | A. Al-Shehri | 82 % | Aug 12 • 1 d | Critical |
| Wahaj Advanced Structures | Aerostructures | SAMI Review | T1 Screen | Tier 1 | Yanbu | Board Sponsor | 92 % | Aug 15 | Normal |
| SAMI Advanced Manuf. | Aerostructures | Approved | Re-cert | Tier 1 | Riyadh | M. George | 100 % | Aug 06 ✓ | Closed |
| Peninsula Munitions | Munitions | Approved | Onboarding | Tier 1 | Riyadh | R. Al-Salem | 100 % | Aug 03 ✓ | Closed |
Showing 13 of 89 assessmentsPage 1 / 4 ›
Bulk mode
0 selected
no cards selected
|
Move to:
Stage change recorded.
Stage transition · — → —
Confirm supplier engagement
Supplier must accept the invitation before entering the Questionnaire stage.
Supplier: Supplier
All answers audited · stored in supplier record activity log
Active assessment · in flight
Peninsula Aero Systems
CR 2050128374 · Aerostructures · Dhahran · Tier 2 candidate
Stage: Site Visit
Template: On-site Verification Kit v3.2
Due: Aug 13 • in 2 days
Progress
58 %
86 / 148 questions
Evidence
14 / 22
8 uploads pending
Must-pass
3 open
2 red · 1 amber
Days in stage
4 d
SLA 5 d · on track
Timeline
✓Invited · Aug 03 · A. Al-Shehri
✓Questionnaire · Aug 04‑07 · supplier submitted 148 Q
✓Documents · Aug 07‑10 · 14 / 22 uploaded (OCR-indexed)
●Site Visit · Aug 11‑13 · N. Al-Fahad on-site tomorrow
○Scoring · Aug 14‑16
○SAMI Review · Aug 17‑18
○Approved
Open must-pass items
• Q-MC-24 OEE last 12 months — supplier reported 61 % (must-pass ≥ 65 %)
• Q-QM-03 AS9100 certification — expired Jul 31, 2026, renewal in progress
• Q-HSE-19 Facility clearance — pending GAMI letter
Assessor team
Technical AssessorN. Al-Fahad
Team LeadA. Al-Shehri
HSE ReviewerH. Al-Zahrani
Financial AnalystF. Al-Dosari 🔒
Recent activity
Aug 11, 09:12 — M. George uploaded 3 refreshed AS9100 audit docs
Aug 10, 16:40 — Supplier flagged OEE gap in Q-MC-24 comments
Aug 10, 11:05 — Site visit scheduled Aug 13, 08:00 AST
Aug 09, 14:20 — Team Lead calibrated 6 scores (avg +0.3)
Assessor Workload Active assignments · capacity 12 per assessor
| Assessor | Role | Active | Workload | On-time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MGMohammed Ghazi |
Technical Assessor | 11 | 11 / 12 |
91% |
FAFatima Al-Otaibi |
Financial Analyst | 13 | 13 / 12 |
78% |
RSReem Al-Salem |
Team Lead | 10 | 10 / 12 |
89% |
OKOmar Khalid |
Technical Assessor | 9 | 9 / 12 |
94% |
SBSalma Benhaddou |
Technical Assessor | 8 | 8 / 12 |
96% |
AHAli Helmi |
Technical Assessor | 6 | 6 / 12 |
92% |
At-Risk Snapshot Overdue or must-pass gap
| Supplier | Stage | Reason | Days | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Hejaz Metals | Documents | MP-02 gap | -6 | MG |
| KAEC Marine | Scoring | Missing evidence | -5 | OK |
| Jeddah Marine Systems | Questionnaire | MP-05 gap | -4 | FA |
| Advanced Electronics | Scoring | Assessor overload | -2 | RS |
| NADIA Systems | Documents | OCR incomplete | -3 | FA |
| Al-Qassim Munitions | Scoring | Due soon | 5 | FA |
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | Site Visit | Visit in 2 days | 2 | RS |
Directory & Search Suppliers view
Master supplier database · 142 registered · 38 prospects · last synced Aug 8, 2026
Registered
Prospects
External
Smart Match
▣ Cards
≡ Table
Registered
142
across 6 sectors
Approved
34
Tier 1: 21 · Tier 2: 13
In Cycle
89
Wave 4 · Cycle Q3
Prospects
38
6 added this month
Avg Localization
48%
weighted by award
Certifications indexed
312
ISO / AS / NADCAP
Sector
All▾
Technology module
All▾
Region
All▾
City
All▾
Localization %
All▾
Maturity band
All▾
Certifications
All▾
Ownership
All▾
Company size
All▾
Established year
All▾
Export capable
All▾
Vision 2030 tag
All▾
Assessment status
All▾
Saved view
All▾
0 active filters
Reset all
★ Save current view
Last sync: Aug 8, 2026 04:12 UTC · 4 sources online
Suppliers Showing 1–12 of 142 · Card view
☆
⇆
↗
WD
In cycle
Wahaj Defense Industries
CR 1010293847 · Riyadh
Avionics
Wire harness
ISO 9001
100% Saudi
Loc 34%
SME
☆⇆↗
TA
Approved T1
Taibah Arms Mfg.
CR 4030173821 · Al-Kharj
Munitions
Sheet metal
AS9100
NADCAP
Loc 78%
Large
☆⇆↗
SA
Approved T1
Al-Salam Aerospace
CR 1010115498 · Riyadh
Aerostructures
Composites
AS9100
JV
Loc 71%
Large
☆⇆↗
FA
In cycle
Faisal Aero Mfg.
CR 2050173201 · Dammam
Aerostructures
Sheet metal
ISO 9001
100% Saudi
Loc 62%
SME
☆⇆↗
NS
In cycle
NADIA Defence Sys.
CR 1010334512 · Riyadh
C4I
Avionics Elec.
ISO 27001
JV
Loc 52%
Large
☆⇆↗
RE
Re-assess
Riyadh Electronics
CR 1010067231 · Riyadh
Avionics
PCB assembly
100% Saudi
Loc 22%
SME
☆⇆↗
TP
Prospect
Tabuk Precision Ltd.
CR 7030845621 · Tabuk
Aerostructures
CNC machining
ISO 9001
100% Saudi
Loc –
SME
☆⇆↗
JM
In cycle
Jubail Marine Works
CR 2055173942 · Jubail
Naval
CNC machining
ISO 9001
Loc 42%
SME
☆⇆↗
SD
Approved T1
Sahara Dynamics
CR 2050998821 · Dammam
Land Systems
Hydraulics
AS9100
100% Saudi
Loc 68%
Large
☆⇆↗
GC
In cycle
Gulf Cyber Solutions
CR 2055731982 · Dammam
C4I
Software dev.
ISO 27001
JV
Loc 58%
SME
☆⇆↗
AO
Prospect
Arabia Defense Optics
CR 1010884420 · Riyadh
Avionics
Optical systems
ISO 9001
Loc –
SME
☆⇆↗
RD
Approved T1
Riyadh Defense Elite
CR 1010229384 · Riyadh
Land Systems
CNC machining
AS9100
NADCAP
Loc 72%
Large
Rows per page: 12 · Showing 1–12 of 142
…
Table View Same 142 records · sortable columns · bulk actions
| Supplier | Sector | Module | Region | Ownership | Certifications | Loc % | Maturity | Status | Last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WD Wahaj Defense Ind. CR 1010293847 |
Avionics | Wire harness | Riyadh | 100% Saudi | ISO 9001 | 34% | In cycle | Aug 6 | ||
TA Taibah Arms Mfg. CR 4030173821 |
Munitions | Sheet metal | Al-Kharj | 100% Saudi | AS9100, NADCAP | 78% | Approved T1 | Aug 4 | ||
SA Al-Salam Aerospace CR 1010115498 |
Aerostructures | Composites | Riyadh | JV | AS9100 | 71% | Approved T1 | Aug 3 | ||
FA Faisal Aero Mfg. CR 2050173201 |
Aerostructures | Sheet metal | Dammam | 100% Saudi | ISO 9001 | 62% | In cycle | Aug 2 | ||
TP Tabuk Precision Ltd. CR 7030845621 |
Aerostructures | CNC machining | Tabuk | 100% Saudi | ISO 9001 | – | – | Prospect | Aug 6 | |
RE Riyadh Electronics CR 1010067231 |
Avionics | PCB assembly | Riyadh | 100% Saudi | – | 22% | Re-assess | Jul 28 |
Rows per page: 12 · Showing 1–6 of 142 preview
…
Peninsula Aero Systems Full record
CR 2050128374 · Aerostructures · Dhahran · Tier 2 candidate · Active cycle: FY26 Wave 4 — Aerostructures onboarding · Assessor: N. Al‑Fahad
Overall score
3.4 / 5
weighted across 11 dims
Progress
58 %
86 / 148 questions
Evidence
14 / 22
8 uploads pending
Must‑pass open
3
2 red · 1 amber
Saudi content
42 %
target 60 % by 2030
Days in stage
4 d
SLA 5 d · on track
Overview
Scoring & 12 Dimensions
Evidence Vault
Timeline & Audit
Team & Comments
Risk & Must‑pass
📋 Operational Assessment
Radar snapshot vs Aerostructures cohort
| Dimension | Weight | Supplier | Cohort avg | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🎯 Strategic Alignment | 10 % | 3.6 | 3.4 | |
| 🔬 Technical Capability | 15 % | 3.2 | 3.6 | |
| 🏭 Manufacturing | 15 % | 2.1 | 3.7 | |
| ✅ Quality Management | 10 % | 2.4 | 3.8 | |
| ⚙️ Operational Capacity | 10 % | 3.4 | 3.3 | |
| 💰 Financial Health 🔒 | 10 % | 3.8 | 3.6 | |
| 🔗 Supply Chain | 5 % | 3.1 | 3.0 | |
| 👥 Workforce & Org | 5 % | 3.9 | 3.5 | |
| 📜 Governance | 5 % | 3.5 | 3.7 | |
| ⚠️ HSE & Security | 5 % | 2.8 | 3.4 | |
| 🇸🇦 Localization | 10 % | 3.8 | 3.5 | |
| Weighted total | 100 % | 3.34 | 3.51 | ‑ 0.17 vs cohort |
Development plan draft (auto‑generated)
Priority 1 ‑ Manufacturing Excellence Program (0‑6 m): CNC uplift, contamination controls, OEE recovery from 61 % → 68 %. Budget SAR 4.2 M. Owner: Peninsula PM + N. Al‑Fahad.
Priority 2 ‑ AS9100 Recertification (0‑3 m): audit closure, CAPA on 3 open findings, renewal filing. Owner: Peninsula QA.
Priority 3 ‑ GAMI Facility Clearance (0‑2 m): physical security walk‑through, personnel clearance completion, GAMI letter. Owner: H. Al‑Zahrani.
Priority 4 ‑ Localization Roadmap (0‑12 m): raise Saudi content 42 % → 60 %, Nitaqat band upgrade, R&D KSA investment. Owner: R. Al‑Qahtani.
Company profile
Legal entity: Peninsula Aero Systems LLC
CR: 2050128374
VAT: 300481920100003
Founded: 2011
HQ: Dhahran, Eastern Province
Employees: 386 (Saudi 168 / 44 %)
Revenue: SAR 218 M (FY 25)
Sectors: Aerostructures, Sub‑assembly
Nitaqat band: Green
iktva last filed: Q1 2026 – 42 %
Certifications
● AS9100 — Expired Jul 31, 2026 (renewal in progress)
● ISO 9001 — valid to Feb 2028
● ISO 14001 — valid to Oct 2027
● ISO 27001 — in progress (target Q4 2026)
● NADCAP — in scope, audit Sep 2026
Contract history
• FY 25 — SAR 24 M (sub‑assembly)
• FY 24 — SAR 18 M
• FY 23 — SAR 12 M
3 active POs · avg payment 51 d
Question‑level scoring (148 questions)
| ID | Question | Dim | Answer | Score | Weighted | Assessor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q‑SA‑05 | Signed localization MoU? | Strategic | Yes, signed Mar 2026 | 4.0 | 0.40 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑TC‑24 | TRL of top‑5 products (must‑pass ≥ 6) | Technical | Avg TRL 6.2 | 3.5 | 0.53 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑MC‑08 | CNC machining capacity (spindle hrs / month) | Mfg | 4,200 hrs | 2.5 | 0.38 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑MC‑24 | OEE last 12 m (must‑pass ≥ 65 %) | Mfg | 61 % | 1.5 ⛔ | 0.23 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑QM‑03 | AS9100 certification & audit | Quality | Expired Jul 31 2026 | 1.0 ⛔ | 0.10 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑OC‑04 | OEE, OTIF, cycle‑time 12 m | Ops | OTIF 88 % | 3.4 | 0.34 | N. Al‑Fahad |
| Q‑FH‑08 | Liquidity & DSCR | Fin | DSCR 1.34 | 3.8 | 0.38 | F. Al‑Dosari 🔒 |
| Q‑HSE‑19 | Facility clearance (must‑pass) | HSE | Pending GAMI letter | 2.5 ⚠ | 0.13 | H. Al‑Zahrani |
| Q‑LC‑02 | Saudi content % + 2030 roadmap | Local. | 42 %; roadmap to 60 % | 3.8 | 0.38 | R. Al‑Qahtani |
Showing 9 of 148 questionsPage 1 / 17
Evidence vault · 14 of 22 uploaded · OCR indexed
| Document | Type | Uploaded | OCR | Retention | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR_Peninsula.pdf | Commercial Reg. | Aug 04 | ✓ | 10 y | VERIFIED |
| VAT_Cert_2026.pdf | VAT / ZATCA | Aug 04 | ✓ | 7 y | VERIFIED |
| FS_2023_24_25_audited.pdf | Audited FS | Aug 05 | ✓ | 10 y | VERIFIED |
| AS9100_expired_2026.pdf | AS9100 cert | Aug 06 | ✓ | 5 y | EXPIRED |
| Nitaqat_Green_Aug2026.pdf | Nitaqat letter | Aug 07 | ✓ | 3 y | VERIFIED |
| iktva_Q1_2026.xlsx | iktva filing | Aug 08 | ✓ | 7 y | VERIFIED |
| MoU_SAMI_2026.pdf | Localization MoU | Aug 08 | ✓ | Life‑of‑contract | VERIFIED |
| Sanctions_screen_Aug.pdf | Sanctions / BO | Aug 09 | ✓ | 7 y | VERIFIED |
| GAMI_facility_letter.pdf | Facility clearance | — | — | — | MISSING |
| CAPA_AS9100.pdf | CAPA plan | — | — | — | PENDING |
Cycle timeline & audit trail (immutable)
✓
Aug 03, 10:24 ‑ A. Al‑Shehri (Team Lead) invited supplier to FY26 Wave 4 cycle. Portal login credentials sent (EN + AR).
✓
Aug 04, 08:12 ‑ Supplier accepted invitation · CR + VAT documents uploaded (2 files).
✓
Aug 04‑07 ‑ Supplier completed 148 / 148 questions.
✓
Aug 05‑10 ‑ 14 / 22 evidence documents uploaded & OCR indexed.
●
Aug 10, 16:40 ‑ Supplier flagged OEE gap (61 % vs 65 % must‑pass) in Q‑MC‑24 comments; CAPA appetite confirmed.
●
Aug 10, 11:05 ‑ Site visit scheduled Aug 13, 08:00 AST (Dhahran).
✓
Aug 11, 09:12 ‑ M. George uploaded 3 refreshed AS9100 audit docs (renewal pack).
○
Aug 11 (today) ‑ Current stage: Site Visit. Next action: on‑site visit Aug 13.
○
Aug 14‑16 ‑ Scoring stage planned.
○
Aug 17‑18 ‑ SAMI Board review planned.
Threaded comments
N. Al‑Fahad · Aug 10, 11:05
Site visit scheduled Aug 13, 08:00 AST. Need production & HSE contact list before then. @Supplier please confirm.
Site visit scheduled Aug 13, 08:00 AST. Need production & HSE contact list before then. @Supplier please confirm.
Supplier PM · Aug 10, 14:22
Confirmed. Amir Al‑Zahrani (Production) + Hassan Al‑Otaibi (HSE) will host.
Confirmed. Amir Al‑Zahrani (Production) + Hassan Al‑Otaibi (HSE) will host.
A. Al‑Shehri · Aug 10, 17:44
Flagging must‑pass risk on OEE 61 % – need mitigation memo before scoring. @N. Al‑Fahad please cover in site visit.
Flagging must‑pass risk on OEE 61 % – need mitigation memo before scoring. @N. Al‑Fahad please cover in site visit.
M. George · Aug 11, 09:12
AS9100 renewal pack uploaded. Waiting for external auditor confirmation.
AS9100 renewal pack uploaded. Waiting for external auditor confirmation.
Assessor team
N. Al‑Fahad — Technical Assessor (lead)
A. Al‑Shehri — Team Lead
H. Al‑Zahrani — HSE Reviewer
F. Al‑Dosari — Financial Analyst 🔒
M. George — Cyber / Sys Admin
R. Al‑Qahtani — Vision 2030 Office
Supplier contacts
Amir Al‑Zahrani — Head of Production
Hassan Al‑Otaibi — HSE Manager
Yasmin Al‑Ghamdi — Supplier PM
Must‑pass & risk register (3 open)
| Rule | Dimension | Severity | Blocking? | Owner | SLA | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q‑MC‑24 OEE 61 % | Mfg | Critical | Yes ⛔ | Peninsula PM | 7 d | Mitigation memo |
| Q‑QM‑03 AS9100 expired | Quality | Critical | Yes ⛔ | Peninsula QA | 14 d | CAPA + renewal |
| Q‑HSE‑19 Facility clearance | HSE | High | Conditional | H. Al‑Zahrani | 21 d | GAMI letter |
⚠️ Overall verdict: This supplier cannot advance to Approved until both critical must‑pass failures are cleared. Current advance is blocked at SAMI Review stage.
Executive Summary
Maturity Assessment
Assessment Detail
Development Roadmap
Portal Progress
Document Vault
Site Visit & Observations
Executive Summary
Last refresh: Aug 13, 2026 · Assessor: A. Al‑Dosari · Reviewer: RUKN Team
Overall Maturity
2.8 / 5
Must‑Pass Status
7 / 8
Localization
34 %
Evidence Coverage
82 %
Financial Health
B+
HSE & Security
3.6 / 5
Qualified with conditions — capable partner for avionics wire harness scope, gated on localization plan and one must‑pass remediation
Wahaj Defense Industries demonstrates solid technical and manufacturing foundations for the wire harness and avionics interconnect scope under evaluation. The organization scored above peer median on Technical Capability and Quality Management, but shows structural gaps in Localization Potential, Supply Chain Resilience, and Strategic Alignment with SAMI's 2030 roadmap.
Key strengths
- AS9100D certified; strong FAI and traceability processes on complex harness builds
- Skilled bilingual workforce (68 % Saudi in technical roles); active Nitaqat Platinum status
- Positive audit trail on 3 previous SAMI trial orders (on‑time, zero major NCRs)
Critical gaps
- No approved Industrial Localization Plan (must‑pass item MP‑05 flagged)
- Single‑source dependency on 4 critical connectors (all imported from EU)
- No formal S&OP; capacity commitments made without demonstrated line balancing
- Cyber & ITAR‑equivalent controls partially documented, not independently audited
Recommended disposition
Shortlist for Tier 2 development track with a 6‑month capability build plan. Re‑assess after remediation of must‑pass MP‑05 and delivery of the 12‑project development roadmap outlined in the Roadmap tab.
Must‑pass criteria
✓ MP‑01 Commercial Registration
✓ MP‑02 AS9100D
✓ MP‑03 Financial Standing
✓ MP‑04 HSE Baseline
✕ MP‑05 Localization Plan
✓ MP‑06 Cyber Baseline
✓ MP‑07 Site Access
✓ MP‑08 Anti‑Bribery
Maturity Assessment
Last refresh: Aug 13, 2026 · Score: 2.8 / 5 · 12‑dimension model v4.4
Overall Maturity
2.8 / 5
Must‑Pass Status
7 / 8
Localization
34 %
Evidence Coverage
82 %
Financial Health
B+
HSE & Security
3.6 / 5
Maturity — 12 Dimensions
Supplier
Peer median
Dimension Scores
Strategic Alignment2.2 / 5
Technical Capability3.6 / 5
Manufacturing Capability3.4 / 5
Quality Management3.5 / 5
Operational Capacity2.4 / 5
Financial Health & Stability3.0 / 5
Supply Chain Resilience1.8 / 5
Workforce & Organisation3.2 / 5
Governance, Comp & Cyber2.6 / 5
HSE & Physical Security3.6 / 5
Localization Potential1.7 / 5
Innovation & R&D2.5 / 5
Strengths
- AS9100D certified, mature FAI process
- Bilingual workforce, 68 % Saudi in technical roles
- Clean audit trail on 3 SAMI trial orders
- Investment in ATE and X‑ray inspection
Weaknesses
- No formal Industrial Localization Plan
- Single‑source on 4 critical connectors
- Absent S&OP; capacity promised on gut feel
- Cyber controls partially documented
Impact
- Localization gap blocks Tier 1 shortlist eligibility
- Supply chain fragility puts 22 % of scope at risk
- Capacity uncertainty limits award size
- Cyber gap blocks classified program access
Assessment Detail
Dimension: Supply Chain Resilience · Score 1.8 / 5 · 24 questions · 82 % evidence coverage
Problem statement
Supplier's supply chain shows critical fragility. Four Class‑A connectors are single‑sourced from EU vendors with 18–22 week lead times, no strategic inventory, and no qualified second source. No formal S&OP process exists, and demand signals do not propagate below Tier 1 suppliers.
Root cause
- No Strategic Sourcing function; procurement is transactional
- Absence of category strategy for critical electronics
- No dual‑sourcing policy or approved alternate parts list
- Inventory policy driven by cost, not by criticality/lead time
Impact
- Estimated 22 % of scope at risk in a single‑vendor disruption
- Working capital ~18 % above sector benchmark
- Blocks ability to commit to SAMI surge demand scenarios
Question‑level evidence
SCR‑04 · Is there a documented dual‑sourcing policy for Class‑A parts?
Answer: No — sole‑source on 4 of 12 Class‑A connectors
SCR‑07 · Is safety stock sized against lead time and criticality?
Answer: Partial — safety stock exists but sized on 12‑month avg cost, not lead time
SCR‑12 · Are Tier 1 suppliers audited on a defined cadence?
Answer: Yes — annual audit plan executed at 91 % completion in 2025
SCR‑15 · Is there a formal S&OP process linking demand and capacity?
Answer: No S&OP; production plan issued weekly by plant manager
Strong × 1.0
Partial × 0.7
None × 0.3
Showing 4 of 24 questions
Development Roadmap
12 projects · 6‑month capability build · Owner: RUKN Team + Wahaj Steering Committee
Development tracks
Localization acceleration
3 projects
- Draft Industrial Localization Plan (MP‑05 remediation)
- Identify & qualify 2 Saudi Tier 2 partners for harness assembly
- Set up Riyadh test lab with GAMI‑approved calibration
Supply chain resilience
3 projects
- Qualify second source for 4 Class‑A connectors
- Implement strategic safety stock policy by criticality tier
- Stand up S&OP process linked to SAMI forecast API
Operations & capacity
3 projects
- Line balancing study + capacity model (surge scenarios)
- MES rollout on avionics harness cell
- Lean transformation pilot on wire prep area
Cyber & governance
2 projects
- ISO 27001 gap assessment + certification path (18 months)
- ITAR‑equivalent controls documentation & audit
Strategic alignment
1 project
- Long‑term partnership charter with SAMI (5‑year horizon)
Impact vs effort matrix
Milestones & owners
| # | Project | Track | Owner | Effort | Impact | Target date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Industrial Localization Plan draft | Localization | Wahaj COO | Low | High | Sep 30, 2026 | IN PROGRESS |
| 2 | Qualify Saudi Tier 2 harness partners | Localization | Wahaj Procurement | Low‑Med | High | Nov 15, 2026 | PLANNED |
| 3 | Line balancing + capacity model | Operations | Wahaj Ops Director | Medium | High | Oct 20, 2026 | IN PROGRESS |
| 4 | Second source for Class‑A connectors | Supply chain | Wahaj SCM | Low | High | Dec 05, 2026 | PLANNED |
| 5 | S&OP process stand‑up | Supply chain | Wahaj COO | Medium | High | Jan 15, 2027 | PLANNED |
| 6 | Riyadh test lab (GAMI‑approved) | Localization | Wahaj CTO | High | Low‑Med | Mar 30, 2027 | PROPOSED |
| 7 | MES rollout — avionics harness cell | Operations | Wahaj IT | Medium | High | Nov 30, 2026 | PLANNED |
| 8 | Lean pilot — wire prep area | Operations | Wahaj Ops | High | Medium | Feb 15, 2027 | PROPOSED |
| 9 | ISO 27001 gap assessment | Cyber | Wahaj CISO | Medium | High | Dec 15, 2026 | IN PROGRESS |
| 10 | ITAR‑equivalent controls audit | Cyber | Wahaj Legal + CISO | Medium | Med‑High | Apr 30, 2027 | PROPOSED |
| 11 | Long‑term partnership charter | Strategy | Wahaj CEO + SAMI | High | High | Jun 30, 2027 | PROPOSED |
| 12 | Innovation JV — connector localization | Strategy | Wahaj R&D + SAMI | High | Medium | Aug 30, 2027 | PROPOSED |
Welcome, Wahaj Defense Industries
Assessment cycle: 2026 Q3 · Deadline: Sep 12, 2026 · 4 weeks remaining
Overall progress
64%
6 of 9 sections complete · 78 of 210 questions remaining
Documents uploaded42 files
Assigned reviewerA. Al‑Dosari
Site visit scheduledAug 22, 2026
LanguageEnglish · العربية
Portal POCAmir Al‑Zahrani
Open RFIs3
Questionnaire sections
✓
Company Profile
20 questions
100%
Submitted✓
Technical Capability
35 questions
100%
Submitted✓
Manufacturing Capability
40 questions
100%
Submitted4
Quality Management
25 questions
72%
In progress5
Financial Information
15 questions · restricted access
33%
In progress6
Supply Chain & Logistics
20 questions
0%
To do7
Workforce & Organisation
15 questions
0%
To do8
HSE & Security
25 questions
0%
To do9
Localization Potential
15 questions
0%
To doDocument Vault
42 documents · 82 % evidence coverage · OCR & auto‑classification enabled
Uploaded
42
Across 9 dimensions
Auto‑classified
38 / 42
4 pending assessor review
Missing evidence
6
Localization & Cyber sections
| Document | Dimension | Linked Q's | Evidence | Size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial_Registration_2026.pdf Uploaded Aug 04 · by Wahaj Admin | Governance | MP‑01, GC‑02 | Strong | 1.2 MB | |
AS9100D_Certificate_2025‑2028.pdf Uploaded Aug 04 · auto‑linked to 12 questions | Quality Mgmt | QM‑01..12 | Strong | 3.4 MB | |
| XLS | supplier_audit_log_2025.xlsx Uploaded Aug 06 · OCR extracted 47 rows | Supply Chain | SCR‑12 | Strong | 412 KB |
inventory_policy_v3.pdf Uploaded Aug 06 · flagged: cost‑based, not lead‑time | Supply Chain | SCR‑07 | Partial | 780 KB | |
| DOC | Nitaqat_Platinum_status_2026.docx Uploaded Aug 05 | Workforce | WF‑03 | Strong | 220 KB |
| IMG | site_visit_shopfloor_riyadh.jpg Captured Aug 22 · GPS tagged · Assessor A.D. | Manufacturing | MF‑14, MF‑22 | Strong | 2.1 MB |
cyber_controls_self_declaration.pdf Uploaded Aug 07 · no 3rd party audit attached | Governance | GC‑08, GC‑09 | Partial | 640 KB | |
| — | Industrial Localization Plan Not uploaded · required for MP‑05 | Localization | LOC‑01..08 | None | — |
| — | GAMI facility clearance letter Not uploaded · required for MP‑07 upgrade | HSE | HSE‑19 | None | — |
Site Visit & Operational Observations
Visited: Aug 22, 2026 · Riyadh plant · 88 checklist items · Lead assessor: A. Al‑Dosari · Report signed Aug 24, 2026
Checklist coverage
82 / 88
6 items remote‑verified
NCRs raised
4
1 major · 3 minor
Calibration status
96 %
124/129 tools in date
Operator interviews
12
EN + AR bilingual
Walkthrough notes — by process area
Wire prep & cutting
Clean, well‑organised. Kitting boards labelled EN+AR. Automatic cutters within calibration. No 5S deviations. 3 operators interviewed, all AS9100 aware.
Assembly & crimping
Skilled workforce but crimp force monitors on 2 of 6 stations only. FOD control needs improvement — open trays observed. NCR‑A24‑002 (minor) raised.
Test & inspection
ATE fleet modern, X‑ray inspection well‑managed, retention samples correctly archived. FAI file for last 5 shipsets complete and traceable.
Warehouse & goods‑in
No segregation between OEM and repair‑stock connectors. Bonded store not physically locked. NCR‑A24‑001 (major) raised — impacts MP‑02 renewal.
Shipping & ESD handling
ESD wrist straps used inconsistently at pack‑out. ESD floor last tested 14 months ago (target 12). NCR‑A24‑003 (minor).
NCR log
| Ref | Area | Sev. | Due |
|---|---|---|---|
| A24‑001 | Warehouse — bonded store | Major | Sep 12 |
| A24‑002 | Assembly — crimp monitor | Minor | Sep 20 |
| A24‑003 | Shipping — ESD floor | Minor | Sep 20 |
| A24‑004 | Documents — MSDS binder | Minor | Sep 15 |
Operator interviews — highlights
- 12 of 12 operators aware of AS9100 requirements; 10 could locate their work instructions in Arabic within 60 s
- Confidence in cross‑training rated 4.1 / 5; concern raised on shift handover documentation
- 3 apprentices actively on RUKN Academy training track
Safety observations
- PPE compliance 100 % on shopfloor during visit
- Emergency exits clear and Arabic‑signed
- LTIFR trailing 12m: 0.7 (sector benchmark 1.2)
Site photos (GPS‑tagged, 8 of 34)
Open full gallery ▸
Wire prep bay · 07:42
Assembly line 2 · 08:15
Bonded store (NCR) · 09:31
ATE bay · 10:04
Crimp stations · 11:20
X‑ray inspection · 12:05
Pack‑out (ESD) · 13:44
Operator interview room · 14:30
Scoring Console Assessments view
11‑dimension weighting · tier thresholds · must‑pass rules · formula editor · v4.2 active · Last edit Aug 08, 2026 by A. Al‑Shehri
Active profile
EVO Standard v4.2
used by 142 suppliers
Total weight
100.0 %
✓ balanced
Portfolio avg (recalc)
3.51
live recompute across 142
Must‑pass rules
9
3 blocking · 6 flag‑only
Tier changes
0
if applied now
Profile version
v4.2 → v4.3 draft
audit log active
11‑Dimension Weights
Tier Thresholds
Must‑pass Rules
Formula & Preview
Audit Trail
🎚️ 11‑dimension weight sliders
Drag each slider to rebalance. Total must equal 100 %. Portfolio recomputes live below.
100.0 %
Live portfolio recalc
3.51
baseline v4.2
Tier movements
0 promoted
0 demoted
142 unchanged
3 watchlist
Presets
📊 Live impact preview — top 8 suppliers under new weights
| Supplier | v4.2 score | New score | Delta | v4.2 tier | New tier | Change |
|---|
🚦 Tier threshold editor
| Tier | Score range | Min score | Must‑pass required | Auto‑action | Count (current) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 Strategic Partner | 4.5 – 5.0 | All 9 required | JV eligible · Board sponsor | 6 | |
| 🥈 Tier 1 Preferred | 4.0 – 4.4 | Any 8 of 9 | Sole source eligible | 30 | |
| 🥉 Tier 2 Approved | 3.5 – 3.9 | Any 6 of 9 | Multi‑source eligible | 44 | |
| 🎨 Conditional | 3.0 – 3.4 | Any 5 of 9 | Development plan required | 42 | |
| ⚠ Improvement Watch | 2.5 – 2.9 | Any 3 of 9 | 90‑day CAPA + re‑assess | 17 | |
| 🚩 Watchlist | < 2.5 | Any 0 required | Blocked from award · recovery plan | 3 |
💡 Impact preview: Lowering Tier 1 minimum from 4.0 → 3.9 would promote 4 suppliers (Al‑Rajhi, Peninsula Munitions, Nile Sat, Riyadh Aerodynamics). Raising Watchlist ceiling from 2.5 → 2.7 would add 3 suppliers to watchlist.
Distribution histogram
142 suppliers by score band
<2.5
3
2.5‑2.9
17
3.0‑3.4
42
3.5‑3.9
44
4.0‑4.4
30
4.5+
6
🚧 Must‑pass rules registry (9 active)
Any “Blocking” rule failure prevents Tier promotion regardless of overall score.
| Rule | Dimension | Trigger | Severity | Enabled | Suppliers failing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP‑01 Signed MoU | 🎯 Strategic | Q‑SA‑05 = No | BLOCKING | 4 | |
| MP‑02 TRL threshold | 🔬 Technical | Q‑TC‑24 < TRL 6 | BLOCKING | 7 | |
| MP‑03 OEE minimum | 🏭 Manufacturing | Q‑MC‑24 < 65 % | BLOCKING | 9 | |
| MP‑04 AS9100 valid | ✅ Quality | Q‑QM‑03 = Not certified | FLAG | 6 | |
| MP‑05 ERP live | ⚙️ Operational | Q‑OC‑22 = None | FLAG | 4 | |
| MP‑06 DSCR > 1.2 | 💰 Financial 🔒 | Q‑FH‑08 DSCR < 1.2 | BLOCKING | 2 | |
| MP‑07 Sanctions clear | 📜 Governance | Q‑GC‑04 = Hit | BLOCKING | 0 | |
| MP‑08 Facility clearance | ⚠ HSE | Q‑HSE‑19 = No | FLAG | 5 | |
| MP‑09 Saudi content ≥ 40 % | 🇸🇦 Localization | Q‑LC‑02 < 40 % | FLAG | 18 |
🚨 Portfolio impact: 20 of 142 suppliers currently fail at least one must‑pass rule. Peninsula, Tabuk and NADIA fail 2 or more — recovery plans active.
🧮 Scoring formula
// EVO Standard v4.2 — weighted composite score
function calcSupplierScore(supplier) {
const weights = {
strategic: 0.10, technical: 0.15, manufacturing: 0.15,
quality: 0.10, operational: 0.10, financial: 0.10,
supplyChain: 0.05, workforce: 0.05, governance: 0.05,
hse: 0.05, localization: 0.10
};
let composite = 0;
for (const dim in weights) {
composite += supplier.scores[dim] * weights[dim];
}
// Must-pass gates — zero-out or cap
if (supplier.mustPassBlocking > 0) return Math.min(composite, 2.9);
return Math.round(composite * 10) / 10;
}
function calcSupplierScore(supplier) {
const weights = {
strategic: 0.10, technical: 0.15, manufacturing: 0.15,
quality: 0.10, operational: 0.10, financial: 0.10,
supplyChain: 0.05, workforce: 0.05, governance: 0.05,
hse: 0.05, localization: 0.10
};
let composite = 0;
for (const dim in weights) {
composite += supplier.scores[dim] * weights[dim];
}
// Must-pass gates — zero-out or cap
if (supplier.mustPassBlocking > 0) return Math.min(composite, 2.9);
return Math.round(composite * 10) / 10;
}
💡 Note: Any blocking must‑pass failure caps the overall score at 2.9 (Improvement Watch band) regardless of raw composite. Prevents blocking-rule violators from reaching Tier 1 / 2.
🧪 Test on sample supplier
Peninsula Aero Systems · raw scores
Strategic (10 %)3.6 × 0.10 = 0.36
Technical (15 %)3.2 × 0.15 = 0.48
Manufacturing (15 %)2.1 × 0.15 = 0.32
Quality (10 %)2.4 × 0.10 = 0.24
Operational (10 %)3.4 × 0.10 = 0.34
Financial (10 %)3.8 × 0.10 = 0.38
Supply Chain (5 %)3.1 × 0.05 = 0.16
Workforce (5 %)3.9 × 0.05 = 0.20
Governance (5 %)3.5 × 0.05 = 0.18
HSE (5 %)2.8 × 0.05 = 0.14
Localization (10 %)3.8 × 0.10 = 0.38
Raw composite3.18
Must‑pass fails (Mfg + AS9100)Cap → 2.1
Final score2.1 · 🚩 Watchlist
📜 Audit trail · immutable log
Every weight change, threshold edit and must‑pass toggle recorded with actor, timestamp and rationale.
| Timestamp | Actor | Change | Before | After | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 08, 2026 14:22 | A. Al‑Shehri | Weight: Localization | 8 % | 10 % | Vision 2030 alignment push |
| Aug 08, 2026 14:20 | A. Al‑Shehri | Weight: Manufacturing | 18 % | 15 % | Rebalance to fund Localization uplift |
| Aug 07, 2026 11:04 | M. George | Must‑pass: MP‑09 Saudi content ≥ 40 % | Off | On (Flag) | GAMI directive Aug 2026 |
| Aug 05, 2026 09:47 | A. Al‑Shehri | Tier 1 threshold | 4.1 | 4.0 | Align to industry benchmark |
| Jul 28, 2026 16:32 | A. Al‑Shehri | Profile published | v4.1 | v4.2 | Quarterly refresh · board approved |
| Jul 26, 2026 13:15 | F. Al‑Dosari | Must‑pass: MP‑06 DSCR > 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | Post‑distress episode Tabuk Metal |
| Jul 20, 2026 10:03 | M. George | Watchlist threshold | 2.4 | 2.5 | Board request · tighter gate |
| Jul 15, 2026 15:48 | A. Al‑Shehri | New must‑pass: MP‑08 Facility clearance | — | Created (Flag) | Classified programme onboarding |
Task Inbox Collaboration view
Unified workflow queue · 47 open tasks · 12 assigned to me · SLA tracked · Cycle FY26 Q3 · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
My Open Tasks
12
3 due today · 5 this week
Overdue
4
2 mine · 2 team
Awaiting Approval
7
Team Lead sign‑off
Completed (30 d)
148
92 % on‑time
Avg Cycle Time
2.4 d
SLA 3 d · ‑0.6 d
Team Load
78%
8 assessors · 1 over
Filter:
|
Task ID
Title / Supplier
Type · Stage
Priority
Assignee
Progress
SLA
Due
Showing 12 of 12 tasks · Sort: Due date ▲
← Prev · Page 1/1 · Next →
📥 New
4
🔄 In progress
5
⏸ Waiting
2
👁 In review
1
✅ Done (30d)
148
Workflow SLA performance (last 30 d)
Target SLA per task type · red = breach · 148 completed tasks
| Workflow | Vol | SLA | Avg | On‑time | Progress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔍 Document review | 42 | 1 d | 0.8 d | 95% | |
| 🎯 Dimension scoring | 38 | 3 d | 2.4 d | 92% | |
| ✅ Team Lead approval | 28 | 1 d | 1.1 d | 85% | |
| 📝 RFI response (supplier) | 18 | 5 d | 6.2 d | 67% | |
| 🏭 Site visit closeout | 9 | 2 d | 1.7 d | 100% | |
| 🚩 CAPA response | 7 | 7 d | 8.4 d | 71% | |
| 📎 Evidence upload | 6 | 2 d | 1.3 d | 100% |
💡 Insight: Supplier‑side RFI response and CAPA closure are the biggest bottlenecks (67% and 71% on‑time). Consider auto‑reminders on Day 3 and Team Lead escalation on Day 5.
Team workload
Active tasks · capacity 8 per assessor
A. Al‑Shehri · Team Lead6 / 8
N. Al‑Fahad · Tech Assessor9 / 8 ⚠
M. George · Cyber Reviewer5 / 8
F. Al‑Dosari · Financial Analyst 🔒7 / 8
R. Al‑Qahtani · HSE Reviewer4 / 8
H. Al‑Zahrani · Program Manager3 / 8
S. Al‑Ghamdi · Tech Assessor6 / 8
O. Al‑Khalifa · SAMI Reviewer7 / 8
⚠ N. Al‑Fahad is over capacity (9/8). Re‑assign 1 task ▸
Automation & escalation rules
8 rules active · triggered 122 times in last 30 d
| Rule | Trigger | Action | Fired | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 · Auto‑assign scoring | Assessment reaches "Scoring" stage | Assign to sector's Tech Assessor + notify | 38 | ACTIVE |
| R2 · Day‑3 RFI reminder | Supplier RFI open ≥ 3 d | Email supplier + CC assessor (EN/AR) | 27 | ACTIVE |
| R3 · SLA breach escalation | Task overdue by 24 h | Escalate to Team Lead + red flag | 18 | ACTIVE |
| R4 · Must‑pass fail → CAPA | Blocking must‑pass fails during scoring | Auto‑create CAPA task (7 d SLA) | 14 | ACTIVE |
| R5 · Load balancer | Assessor exceeds 8 active tasks | Suggest re‑assign to under‑loaded peer | 9 | ACTIVE |
| R6 · Score → auto‑approval routing | Scoring complete, all must‑pass ✓ | Route to Team Lead approval queue | 7 | ACTIVE |
| R7 · Board escalation SLA | Board Fast Pack template dispatched | 24 h SLA · hourly reminders after 12 h | 6 | ACTIVE |
| R8 · Weekend defer | Task due Fri/Sat with < 1 d slack | Auto‑extend to Sunday 09:00 AST | 3 | PAUSED |
TASK-2026-…
Task title
Supplier · Cycle · Stage
Stage-gate questionnaire
Move task
Notifications & Alerts Collaboration view
Central alert stream · 38 unread · 12 channels · SLA & risk triggers · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
Critical unread
6
Peninsula · Tabuk · Board pack
High unread
14
RFI · Approvals · CAPA
Info unread
18
Digest & mentions
Delivered (24 h)
312
98.7 % success
Active rules
24
SLA · risk · workflow
Quiet hours
22:00→06:00
Deferred: 4 · Critical bypass
Filter:
|
Alert stream · newest first · 38 matches
Group by:
Delivery channels
Per-channel routing · quiet hours & critical bypass
🔔 In-appON · all severities
📧 Email (EN/AR)ON · high + critical
📱 SMSCritical only
💬 MS Teams webhookON · #evo-alerts
📲 Push (mobile)ON · quiet 22-06
🗓 Calendar (.ics)Site visits only
Delivery health (24 h)
312 sent · 4 failed · 0 bounces
In-app168 · 100%
Email88 · 98%
Teams32 · 100%
SMS14 · 93%
Push10 · 100%
Top rule triggers (7 d)
Which alert rules fire most
A5 · Day-3 RFI reminder62
A2 · SLA breach escalation31
A1 · Must-pass failed18
A7 · Board 24 h SLA12
A3 · Score drop7
Alert rule library
24 rules · 22 active · 2 paused · edit routing & escalation
| Rule | Trigger | Severity | Channels | Audience | Fired 7 d | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 · Must-pass failed | Blocking must-pass = fail | CRITICAL | In-app · Email · SMS · Teams | Team Lead + Sponsor | 18 | ACTIVE |
| A2 · SLA breach | Task overdue > 24 h | HIGH | In-app · Email · Teams | Assignee + Team Lead | 31 | ACTIVE |
| A3 · Score drop | Composite falls ≥ 0.3 pt vs prior cycle | HIGH | In-app · Email | Team Lead | 7 | ACTIVE |
| A4 · Financial distress | DSCR < 1.2 or EBITDA < 0 | CRITICAL | In-app · Email · SMS 🔒 | Financial Analyst | 4 | ACTIVE |
| A5 · Day-3 RFI reminder | Supplier RFI open ≥ 3 d | INFO | Email EN/AR | Supplier + CC assessor | 62 | ACTIVE |
| A6 · Localization drop | Saudi content < 40 % | HIGH | In-app · Email | Vision 2030 office | 5 | ACTIVE |
| A7 · Board pack window | Fast Pack in progress + 12 h to SLA | CRITICAL | All channels | Team Lead + Sponsor | 12 | ACTIVE |
| A8 · Sanctions match | World-Check flag on supplier / UBO | CRITICAL | In-app · Email · SMS | Governance + Sponsor | 1 | ACTIVE |
| A9 · Weekly digest | Sunday 07:00 AST | INFO | All SAMI users | 1 | ACTIVE | |
| A10 · Weekend defer | Non-critical alerts Fri/Sat | INFO | Deferred to Sunday | All users | 4 | PAUSED |
Comments & @Mentions Collaboration view
Unified conversation stream · every comment across suppliers, tasks, scoring, evidence · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
Threads (7 d)
184
42 active this week
Mentions of me
8
3 unread · 2 replies pending
Open questions
14
Awaiting response
Resolved (30 d)
126
87 % within 2 d
Active contributors
28
14 SAMI · 14 supplier
Avg first response
1.8 h
Target 4 h
Filter:
|
Threads · 10 matching
Sort:
Loading…
Select a thread
AS
@Mentions inbox — A. Al‑Shehri
8 mentions · 3 unread · fastest response 4 min
N. Al‑Fahad 09:12 · today
@A. Al‑Shehri Peninsula OEE reading 61 % contradicts their self-declared 74 %. Need Team Lead override or send RFI for evidence?
Context: 🎯 Peninsula Aero Systems · Scoring · dim Manufacturing
O. Al‑Khalifa 08:47 · today
@A. Al‑Shehri Board pack draft ready — please review slide 6 (Localization) and slide 11 (Tabuk risk) before 17:00.
Context: 🎩 Board pack Aug 2026 · Task T-2026-0803
F. Al‑Dosari 🔒 06:33 · today
@A. Al‑Shehri Tabuk DSCR 0.9 — recommend downgrade to Watchlist or 90-day recovery plan?
Context: 💰 Financial · Tabuk Metal Forming
S. Al‑Ghamdi Aug 10 · 22:14
@A. Al‑Shehri Al‑Kharj site visit closeout memo uploaded. All 88 checklist items green. Approve for scoring?
Context: 🏭 Al‑Kharj Composites · Site Visit
M. George Aug 10 · 15:02
@A. Al‑Shehri ISO 27001 audit at Peninsula shows 62 % maturity. Suggest CAPA action or defer to next cycle?
Context: 🛡 Cyber Governance · Peninsula
— 3 older mentions —
Team activity (last 24 h)
Top commenters · avg first response · most-discussed suppliers
Top commenters
ASA. Al‑Shehri · Team Lead28 comments
NAN. Al‑Fahad · Tech Assessor21
MGM. George · Cyber Reviewer18
FDF. Al‑Dosari 🔒 · Financial14
SGS. Al‑Ghamdi · Tech Assessor12
Most-discussed suppliers (7 d)
Peninsula Aero Systems36 comments
Al‑Salam Aerospace22
Tabuk Metal Forming18
Wahaj Advanced Structures14
NADIA Aerospace11
Response time (rolling 7 d)
SAMI internal
1.2 h
target 4 h ✓
Supplier
6.4 h
target 8 h ⚠
Cross-team
3.1 h
target 6 h ✓
Slash commands & smart references
Type any of these inside the composer to trigger inline actions
| Command | Autocomplete | Effect | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| @name | All 42 SAMI users + supplier POCs | Tags the person, notifies them, adds them as watcher | @N. Al‑Fahad please add evidence |
| @team | team-aero · team-c4i · team-financial … | Notifies every member of the group | @team-aero calibration Aug 12 |
| #supplier | 142 suppliers | Creates a clickable pill linking to the Supplier Cockpit | #Peninsula-Aero score drop |
| #task | Open tasks by ID | Links the comment to that task's activity feed | #T-2026-0812 needs OEE |
| #dim | 12 dimensions | Anchors the comment to a scoring dimension | #Localization NADIA below 40 % |
| /task | — slash command | Converts the comment into a new task with SLA | /task Send RFI · assignee @M.George · due 3d |
| /decide | — slash command | Marks the comment as a formal decision, immutable in audit | /decide Approve Al‑Salam Strategic Partner tier |
| /block | — slash command | Flags a blocker, links to source task, triggers rule A2 | /block Missing calibration cert INS-03 |
| /resolve | — slash command | Closes the thread, requires 1-line closure note | /resolve Fixed on Aug 10 · CAPA closed |
| /translate | EN ↔ AR | Inserts machine translation with reviewer badge | /translate ar |
Supplier Portal Collaboration view
External-facing workspace · what suppliers see when they log in · currently previewing as Wahaj Advanced Structures · Cycle FY26 W4 Aero onboarding · Aug 11, 2026
👁 SAMI Preview Mode
Impersonating supplier POC · Amir Al-Zahrani · amir.z@wahaj-advanced.sa
Switch supplier:
S
SAMI Supplier Portal
portal.sami.evo/W4-AERO-2026
🔔 4
💬 2
AZ
Amir Al-Zahrani
Wahaj Advanced Structures · POC
Welcome back
أهلاً وسهلاً, Amir 👋
Your FY26 Wave 4 onboarding assessment is 65 % complete. 12 days remain before the Sep 05 deadline.
352
of 542 answered
18
of 42 evidence
3
Open RFI
Overall progress · 65 %
Next milestone: submit for review · target Aug 25, 2026
🏠 Dashboard
📝 Questionnaire 65%
📎 Evidence Vault 18/42
📮 RFIs 3
💬 Messages 2
🏭 Site Visit
🎯 My Results
❓ Help
🚨 Action needed (5)
Complete these to keep your assessment on track
📮 Respond to RFI · Additive manufacturing capacity proof
Sent by N. Al-Fahad · Due Aug 13, 2026 · 2 d remaining
Sent by N. Al-Fahad · Due Aug 13, 2026 · 2 d remaining
📎 Upload · AS9100 valid certificate
Required for Quality Management dimension · Due Aug 15
Required for Quality Management dimension · Due Aug 15
📝 Complete · Localization dimension (14 questions remaining)
iktva simulator inputs · Saudi content roadmap
iktva simulator inputs · Saudi content roadmap
🏭 Confirm · Site visit date & on-site coordinator
Proposed Aug 22–23 · SAMI assessor N. Al-Fahad + HSE reviewer
Proposed Aug 22–23 · SAMI assessor N. Al-Fahad + HSE reviewer
💬 Reply · A. Al-Shehri asked about R&D headcount growth plan
Message · 4 h ago
Message · 4 h ago
Progress by dimension
Click any row to jump to that dimension's questions
1. Strategic Alignment52 / 52 ✓
2. Technical Capability78 / 78 ✓
3. Manufacturing68 / 81 ⚠
4. Quality Management58 / 64 ⚠
5. Operational Capacity48 / 48 ✓
6. Financial Health 🔒0 / 38 (locked)
7. Supply Chain34 / 34 ✓
8. Workforce & Org32 / 32 ✓
9. Governance & Comp.30 / 36 ⚠
10. HSE & Security34 / 34 ✓
11. Localization31 / 45 ⚠
💡 Tip: Auto-fill remaining Localization inputs from your iktva 2025 filing by uploading it to Evidence — saves ~90 minutes.
Timeline
21-day assessment window · Aug 15 → Sep 05, 2026
✓
Aug 03 · Invitation received
Kick-off call with A. Al-Shehri, EN/AR welcome pack
✓
Aug 05 · Portal login & team roles set
4 users invited · Finance role locked
◐
Aug 05 → Aug 25 · Questionnaire & evidence (in progress)
65 % complete · 12 days to soft deadline
3
Aug 22–23 · Site visit
N. Al-Fahad + HSE reviewer + mobile kit dispatched
4
Aug 26 → Sep 01 · SAMI scoring
You may see RFI questions in this window
5
Sep 05 · Results & tier decision
Final report + development plan published here
Your team (4)
Grant colleagues access — Finance role stays with the POC
AZAmir Al-Zahrani · POC 🔒Full access
MKMona Al-Khaldi · QualityQuality dim
HAHind Al-Amri · OperationsMfg + Ops
YSYasser Salem · HRWorkforce
+ Invite colleague
11 Dimensions
3. Manufacturing68/81
1. Strategic52/52 ✓
2. Technical78/78 ✓
4. Quality58/64 ⚠
5. Operational48/48 ✓
6. Financial 🔒—
7. Supply Chain34/34 ✓
8. Workforce32/32 ✓
9. Governance30/36 ⚠
10. HSE34/34 ✓
11. Localization31/45 ⚠
Dimension 3 of 12 · 15 % weight
Manufacturing Capability
68 of 81 questions answered · 13 remaining · auto-saved 2 s ago ✓
Q-MC-24 · Numeric · Must-pass✓ ANSWERED
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) across primary production lines — last 6-month average
Report as % · target ≥ 65 % · evidence upload required (MES/ERP export)
%
📎 wahaj-oee-jan-jun-2026.xlsx
Q-MC-32 · Likert 1-5 · Weight 2.0⚠ NEEDS ANSWER
Maturity of additive manufacturing (metal / composite lay-up) capability
1 = none · 2 = prototyping · 3 = pilot production · 4 = serial · 5 = certified serial with IP
⚠ SAMI has requested evidence of your 5 EOS M290 printers (RFI-201). Please attach installation LC + commissioning schedule.
Q-MC-40 · Multi-select✓ ANSWERED
Which manufacturing certifications does the facility currently hold?
Q-MC-51 · Document upload · Must-pass✕ NOT UPLOADED
AS9100D certificate — valid within 12 months
Accepted formats: PDF · max 10 MB · will be OCR-indexed automatically
📎
Drag & drop your certificate here, or
Q-MC-58 · Long text · Conditional (shown because Q-MC-32 ≥ 4)⚠ NEEDS ANSWER
Describe your additive manufacturing IP portfolio — patents, know-how, exclusive process licenses
0 / 2000 characters · auto-save every 10 s
🌐 Translate to Arabic
Evidence Vault · 18 of 42 documents uploaded
Drag & drop anywhere · OCR + auto-classification enabled · bilingual EN/AR
DocumentCategorySizeUploadedOCRStatus
📄wahaj-CR-2026.pdf
Commercial Registration · certifiedGovernance1.4 MBAug 05✓ CompleteACCEPTED
Commercial Registration · certifiedGovernance1.4 MBAug 05✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📄zatca-vat-cert-2026.pdf
VAT Certificate · ZATCAGovernance0.8 MBAug 05✓ CompleteACCEPTED
VAT Certificate · ZATCAGovernance0.8 MBAug 05✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📄iso-9001-2024.pdf
ISO 9001:2015 · issued 2024Quality2.1 MBAug 06✓ CompleteACCEPTED
ISO 9001:2015 · issued 2024Quality2.1 MBAug 06✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📄as9100d-cert-2025.pdf
AS9100D · expired Jun 2026 ⚠Quality2.3 MBAug 06✓ CompleteRESUBMIT
AS9100D · expired Jun 2026 ⚠Quality2.3 MBAug 06✓ CompleteRESUBMIT
📄wahaj-nitaqat-jul-2026.pdf
Platinum band · issued Jul 2026Workforce0.6 MBAug 07✓ CompleteACCEPTED
Platinum band · issued Jul 2026Workforce0.6 MBAug 07✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📊wahaj-oee-jan-jun-2026.xlsx
MES export · 6-month OEE historyManufacturing3.8 MBAug 08✓ CompleteACCEPTED
MES export · 6-month OEE historyManufacturing3.8 MBAug 08✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📄iktva-filing-2025.pdf
Aramco iktva · certified 41 % Saudi contentLocalization1.2 MBAug 08⚠ PartialIN REVIEW
Aramco iktva · certified 41 % Saudi contentLocalization1.2 MBAug 08⚠ PartialIN REVIEW
📄audited-fs-2023-2024-2025.pdf
3-year audited statements · KPMGFinancial 🔒8.4 MBAug 08✓ CompleteACCEPTED
3-year audited statements · KPMGFinancial 🔒8.4 MBAug 08✓ CompleteACCEPTED
📄eos-m290-lc-2026.pdf
Letter of Credit · 2 additional printers · commissioning Aug 20Manufacturing0.9 MBAug 10✓ CompleteACCEPTED
Letter of Credit · 2 additional printers · commissioning Aug 20Manufacturing0.9 MBAug 10✓ CompleteACCEPTED
❌Awaiting: bank-guarantee-template.pdf
Required for Financial dimension · Aug 12Financial 🔒—Pending—MISSING
Required for Financial dimension · Aug 12Financial 🔒—Pending—MISSING
❌Awaiting: AS9100D-refresh.pdf
Must-pass · Quality dimension · Aug 15Quality—Pending—MISSING
Must-pass · Quality dimension · Aug 15Quality—Pending—MISSING
❌Awaiting: MES-export-jul-2026.xlsx
Requested via RFI-201 · Aug 13Manufacturing—Pending—MISSING
Requested via RFI-201 · Aug 13Manufacturing—Pending—MISSING
— 18 uploaded + 3 pending + 21 not yet requested —
Requests for Information (RFI)
3 open · 5 answered · 1 overdue · SAMI assessors typically respond in 4 h
RFI-201 · Sent Aug 08 by N. Al-Fahad (Tech Assessor) · Due Aug 13, 2026
Additive manufacturing capacity proof
During the pre-visit review we noted your questionnaire declares 5× EOS M290 printers, but the equipment list only lists 3 as active. Please attach LC/PO evidence for the 2 additional printers and expected commissioning date. Also share the projected utilisation rate for months Sep–Dec 2026.
Response should include: MES export July 2026 + LC document + capacity plan
RFI-198 · Sent Aug 06 by M. George (Cyber Reviewer) · Due Aug 14, 2026
Cyber posture — ISO 27001 clause gap analysis
Please provide clause-by-clause maturity self-assessment against ISO 27001:2022 Annex A, and confirm whether MFA + Conditional Access are enforced on your MES environment.
RFI-195 · Sent Aug 05 by F. Al-Dosari 🔒 (Financial Analyst) · Due Aug 12, 2026
Working capital & escrow arrangements
Please share bank confirmation of working-capital line and escrow arrangement details (bank guarantee template attached).
RFI-189 · Sent Aug 03 by A. Al-Shehri · Answered Aug 04
Clarification on R&D headcount growth plan
"Wahaj plans to grow R&D from 24 to 42 engineers by end of 2027, with 60 % Saudization target."
Conversations · 4
A. Al-Shehri · Team Lead4 h ago
Any update on R&D headcount growth?
N. Al-Fahad · Tech Assessoryesterday
Site visit confirmed Aug 22-23…
M. George · CyberAug 09
Thanks for the ISO overview…
SAMI SupportAug 05
Welcome to the portal!…
A. Al-Shehri · Team Lead
Typically replies within 1-2 hours · 🟢 online
— Aug 09, 2026 —
Hi Amir, welcome! Let me know if any question is unclear — happy to jump on a call anytime.
A. Al-Shehri · 09:14 AST
شكراً جزيلاً! We are on track and the questionnaire is straightforward so far. I'll flag anything unclear.
You · 11:02 AST
— Today · Aug 11 —
Any update on R&D headcount growth plan? Also — could you preview the additive manufacturing IP list before Friday? Would help my scoring window.
A. Al-Shehri · 05:14 AST · 🔵 unread
🌐 EN → auto-translate to AR is on
Proposed site visit
Aug 22 – Aug 23, 2026 · 2 days · Yanbu facility
SAMI team: N. Al-Fahad (Tech) · R. Al-Qahtani (HSE) · S. Al-Ghamdi (support)
On-site agenda (draft)
88 checklist items · Manufacturing 36 · Quality 26 · HSE 26
Day 1 · 07:00Arrival · badge issue · opening meeting
08:00–12:00Manufacturing walk · CNC bays · additive shop
13:00–16:00Cleanroom + NDT lab · calibration records
16:00–17:30End-of-day debrief · open items
Day 2 · 08:00HSE + Security walk · perimeter · SOC
12:00–15:00Quality management review · CAPA · MRB
15:00–17:00Closing meeting · findings · sign-off
Please confirm / provide
These help us minimise on-site friction
Results not yet available
Your final score will be published here on Sep 05, 2026
You will see: composite score, tier band, 11-dimension breakdown, benchmark vs Aerostructures cohort, development recommendations, and an export of the full report.
Prior cycle: FY25 W2 Aero · Result
Published Feb 12, 2026 · downloadable
Composite
3.9 / 5
Tier
🥈 Tier 1
Percentile
78th
Trend
▲ +0.3
Frequently asked questions
Answers to what most suppliers ask
Q. What if I miss the Sep 05 deadline?
A. You can request one 7-day extension free of charge — beyond that, the cycle is closed and rescheduled to the next wave.
A. You can request one 7-day extension free of charge — beyond that, the cycle is closed and rescheduled to the next wave.
Q. Why is the Financial dimension locked to me?
A. Financial data is handled only by SAMI's Financial Analyst under stricter access controls. You upload PDFs and answer only high-level questions.
A. Financial data is handled only by SAMI's Financial Analyst under stricter access controls. You upload PDFs and answer only high-level questions.
Q. Can I edit answers after submission?
A. Yes, until you press "Submit for review". After that, changes require an assessor to reopen the answer.
A. Yes, until you press "Submit for review". After that, changes require an assessor to reopen the answer.
Q. What certifications are recognised?
A. AS9100D, ISO 9001, NADCAP, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001, IATF 16949 — plus GACA and SASO for domestic scope.
A. AS9100D, ISO 9001, NADCAP, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001, IATF 16949 — plus GACA and SASO for domestic scope.
Q. How is my data protected?
A. End-to-end encryption at rest and in transit, ISO 27001 certified hosting inside KSA, granular role-based access, and immutable audit logs.
A. End-to-end encryption at rest and in transit, ISO 27001 certified hosting inside KSA, granular role-based access, and immutable audit logs.
Contact SAMI
📧 supplier-support@sami.evo
📞 +966 11 500 EVO0 (386 0)
🕐 Sun–Thu · 08:00–17:00 AST
🌐 EN / العربية support
© 2026 Saudi Arabian Military Industries · Supplier Portal v2.4
Session ends in 27 min · Extend
Export & Reporting Studio Reports view
Reusable report library · 24 templates · drag-and-drop builder · watermarked PDF/PPTX/XLSX/CSV exports · 148 exports this month · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
Report templates
24
18 published · 6 draft
Exports (30 d)
148
+22 vs prior 30 d
Scheduled
12
Weekly · Monthly · QBR
Avg render time
18 s
Board pack 42 s
Watermarked
100 %
Recipient · timestamp · hash
Restricted (30 d)
18
Financial · Board · Cyber
Filter:
|
Most-used templates (30 d)
Ranked by export volume
🎩 Board Pack — August cycle28 exports
🏭 Supplier scorecard (single)42
📊 Cycle summary XLSX21
🇸🇦 iktva / Localization deep-dive14
💰 Financial risk register 🔒9
Recent exports (yours)
Last 8 exports · click to re-download
🎩 Board Pack Aug 2026 v3.pptx08:44 · today
🏭 Peninsula scorecard.pdf07:12 · today
📊 FY26 Q3 W3 summary.xlsxyesterday · 18:22
🇸🇦 iktva simulator batch.xlsxyesterday · 14:05
🏭 Al‑Salam scorecard.pdfAug 09 · 22:14
🚩 Risk register export.csvAug 09 · 15:32
📈 Cohort benchmark radar.pdfAug 08 · 11:28
💰 Financial risk 🔒 (redacted).pdfAug 07 · 09:44
Blocks
Drag onto the canvas
🎩 Cover slide
Title · date · watermark
Title · date · watermark
📊 KPI banner
6 stat tiles
6 stat tiles
📈 11-dim radar
Single or cohort
Single or cohort
🔥 Heat-map
Suppliers × dims
Suppliers × dims
📋 Ranking table
Top / bottom N
Top / bottom N
⚖ Weight table
Scoring profile
Scoring profile
🚩 Risk register
Filters by tier
Filters by tier
🚨 CAPA status
Open / due / closed
Open / due / closed
🇸🇦 iktva chart
Local content trajectory
Local content trajectory
💵 Cost savings
Realised / planned
Realised / planned
💰 Financial 🔒
Restricted role
Restricted role
🛡 Cyber posture
ISO 27001 heat
ISO 27001 heat
📝 Narrative block
Auto-generated text
Auto-generated text
🖼 Image / logo
SAMI · supplier · Vision 2030
SAMI · supplier · Vision 2030
📑 Appendix
Data-room links
Data-room links
v3 draft · auto-saved 4 s ago
Slide 1 · 🎩 Cover slide · "FY26 Q3 Board Pack" · Aug 12 2026⋮⋮
Slide 2 · 📊 KPI banner · 6 tiles · FY26 Q3 scope⋮⋮
Slide 3 · 📈 11-dim radar · portfolio + top 3 suppliers overlay⋮⋮
Slide 4 · 🔥 Heat-map · top 15 × 11 dims · watchlist highlighted⋮⋮
Slide 5 · 📋 Ranking table · top 10 + bottom 3⋮⋮
Slide 6 · 🇸🇦 iktva chart · Saudi content trajectory · target 75 %⋮⋮
Slide 7 · 💵 Cost savings · realised SAR 84 M FY26 YTD⋮⋮
Slide 8 · 🚩 Risk register · 20 suppliers · CAPA active⋮⋮
Slide 9 · 💰 Financial 🔒 · restricted · Analyst + Sponsor only⋮⋮
Slide 10 · 📝 Narrative · auto-summary of key movers⋮⋮
Slide 11 · 📑 Appendix · methodology · data-room · sources⋮⋮
Drop blocks here to add slides
Properties
Slide 4 · Heat-map · configure data + styling
Dataset
Cohort
Dimensions
Score band scale
Output settings
Language
Scheduled reports (12)
Runs automatically · delivered by email + secure link + calendar attach
| Schedule | Template | Cadence | Next run | Recipients | Format | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-01 · Weekly leadership brief | 🎩 Board Pack (light) | Every Sun 07:00 AST | Aug 16 · 07:00 | 12 board members | PDF + PPTX | ACTIVE |
| S-02 · Monthly supplier scorecards | 🏭 Supplier scorecard | 1st of month 08:00 | Sep 01 · 08:00 | 142 supplier POCs | PDF (EN/AR) | ACTIVE |
| S-03 · Quarterly QBR pack | 🎩 QBR Board Pack | Every quarter · Day 5 | Oct 05 · 09:00 | Board + CEO office | PPTX | ACTIVE |
| S-04 · Watchlist recovery tracker | 🚩 Risk register | Every Wed 14:00 | Aug 12 · 14:00 | Team Lead + 3 assessors | XLSX + PDF | ACTIVE |
| S-05 · Vision 2030 iktva update 🇸🇦 | 🇸🇦 Localization deep-dive | Monthly · Day 10 | Sep 10 · 09:00 | Vision 2030 office | PPTX + XLSX | ACTIVE |
| S-06 · Financial risk register 🔒 | 💰 Financial risk (restricted) | Every Mon 08:00 | Aug 17 · 08:00 | F. Al-Dosari + 2 sponsors | PDF (redacted) | ACTIVE |
| S-07 · Cost savings roll-up | 💵 Cost savings tracker | Monthly · Day 3 | Sep 03 · 10:00 | CFO office · Ops leads | XLSX | ACTIVE |
| S-08 · Cyber posture heat 🛡 | 🛡 Cyber posture | Bi-weekly · Wed | Aug 12 · 16:00 | M. George + Governance | ACTIVE | |
| S-09 · Cycle FY26 W4 launch pack | 📊 Cycle launch summary | One-off · pre-launch | Aug 14 · 12:00 | 6 Tier-2 suppliers + team | PDF (EN/AR) | QUEUED |
| S-10 · Supplier onboarding welcome | 🏭 Onboarding welcome pack | Trigger: new supplier | On event | New supplier POC | PDF (EN/AR) | ACTIVE |
| S-11 · Weekend defer digest | 📝 Digest summary | Sun 07:00 | Aug 16 · 07:00 | All SAMI users | Email HTML | PAUSED |
| S-12 · Regulator submission (SAMI Ops) | 📄 GACA / SASO submission | Quarterly · Day 20 | Sep 20 · 12:00 | Regulatory affairs | PDF + signed | ACTIVE |
Export history (30 d)
148 exports · 100 % watermarked · retention 24 months · every download audit-logged
| Time | Report | Format | Requested by | Recipients | Watermark | Size | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08:44 · Aug 11 | 🎩 Board Pack Aug 2026 v3 | PPTX | A. Al-Shehri | 12 board members | RECIPIENT · 08:44 · a3f2e1 | 18 MB | 7 / 12 | ↓ |
| 07:12 · Aug 11 | 🏭 Peninsula scorecard | A. Al-Shehri | Team Lead + Sponsor | A.AL-SHEHRI · 07:12 · b8c4d2 | 1.2 MB | 2 / 2 | ↓ | |
| 18:22 · Aug 10 | 📊 FY26 Q3 W3 summary | XLSX | N. Al-Fahad | Team internal | N.AL-FAHAD · 18:22 · f1a9b5 | 3.4 MB | 4 / 8 | ↓ |
| 14:05 · Aug 10 | 🇸🇦 iktva simulator batch | XLSX | A. Al-Shehri | Vision 2030 office | VISION2030 · 14:05 · c9d7e8 | 4.8 MB | 3 / 3 | ↓ |
| 22:14 · Aug 09 | 🏭 Al-Salam scorecard | A. Al-Shehri | Board sponsor | BOARD · 22:14 · 4bd6a7 | 1.4 MB | 1 / 1 | ↓ | |
| 15:32 · Aug 09 | 🚩 Risk register export | CSV | H. Al-Zahrani | Ops leads (4) | OPS · 15:32 · 5e2c8f | 0.4 MB | 4 / 4 | ↓ |
| 11:28 · Aug 08 | 📈 Cohort benchmark radar | N. Al-Fahad | Team internal | INTERNAL · 11:28 · 9f0a3d | 2.1 MB | 6 / 8 | ↓ | |
| 09:44 · Aug 07 | 💰 Financial risk 🔒 (redacted) | F. Al-Dosari 🔒 | Analyst + Sponsor | REDACTED · 09:44 · e7b1c4 | 1.8 MB | 2 / 2 | ↓ | |
| 08:20 · Aug 07 | 🛡 Cyber posture heat | M. George | Governance panel | GOV · 08:20 · 2a5d9b | 1.1 MB | 3 / 3 | ↓ | |
| 14:20 · Aug 06 | 📄 GACA regulatory submission | PDF (signed) | A. Al-Shehri | GACA regulator | GACA · 14:20 · SIGNED · 8c3fa9 | 6.2 MB | 1 / 1 | ↓ |
| — showing 10 of 148 exports · Page 1 / 15 — | ||||||||
Benchmarking & Cross‑Supplier Analytics Assessments view
Peer sets · sector benchmarks · cohort percentiles · 142 assessed suppliers · Cycle FY26 Q3 · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
Cohort:
All suppliers 142
Aerostructures 32
Munitions 18
C4I 14
Land 11
Tier 1 pool 36
Cycle:
Cohort avg score
3.51 / 5
+0.14 vs FY25 baseline
Top decile
14 suppliers
score ≥ 4.2
Bottom decile
14 suppliers
score ≤ 2.6 · improvement plans active
Sector variance
0.42
std dev across 6 sectors
Must‑pass compliance
86 %
122 / 142 clear all gates
Movers (30 d)
+18
score improved ≥ 0.3 pt
📊 12‑dimension cohort radar
Al‑Salam Aerospace (Tier 1) vs Aerostructures cohort avg vs Tier 1 pool
Al‑Salam
Cohort
Tier 1 pool
Al‑Salam leads on all 12 dimensions · gap widest on Localization (+ 1.8 vs cohort) and Governance/Compliance/Cyber (+ 1.4)
🏭 Sector benchmarks
| Sector | Suppliers | Avg | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerostructures | 32 | 3.7 | |
| C4I | 14 | 3.6 | |
| Munitions | 18 | 3.5 | |
| Avionics | 9 | 3.5 | |
| Land | 11 | 3.3 | |
| Naval | 5 | 3.1 | |
| Portfolio | 142 | 3.51 |
💡 Insight: Aerostructures leads by 0.2 pts. Naval underperforms with only 5 suppliers assessed — recommend expanding cohort by Q4 2026.
🏆 Cohort percentile ranking
| Rank | Supplier | Sector | Overall | Percentile | Delta 30 d | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 1 | Al‑Salam Aerospace | Aerostructures | 4.6 | 99th | ▲ +0.2 | TIER 1 |
| 🥈 2 | Taibah Technologies | C4I | 4.5 | 97th | ▲ +0.4 | TIER 1 |
| 🥉 3 | Advanced Electronics Co. | C4I | 4.4 | 95th | ▲ +0.1 | TIER 1 |
| 4 | SAMI Advanced Manuf. | Aerostructures | 4.3 | 92nd | ▲ +0.3 | TIER 1 |
| 5 | Wahaj Advanced Structures | Aerostructures | 4.2 | 90th | ▲ +0.5 | TIER 1 |
| 6 | Al‑Rajhi Steel Ind. | Land | 4.1 | 87th | ▲ +0.2 | TIER 2 |
| 7 | Peninsula Munitions | Munitions | 4.0 | 84th | → 0.0 | TIER 1 |
| 8 | Nile Sat & Comms | C4I | 3.9 | 80th | ▲ +0.1 | TIER 2 |
| … | 126 suppliers between rank 9 and 138 — filter to expand | |||||
| 139 | NADIA Aerospace | Aerostructures | 2.4 | 7th | ▲ +0.6 | TIER 2 |
| 140 | Tabuk Metal Forming | Land | 2.2 | 4th | ▼ ‑0.4 | WATCHLIST |
| 142 | Peninsula Aero Systems | Aerostructures | 2.1 | 1st | ▼ ‑0.3 | WATCHLIST |
📈 Top movers (30 d)
Positive movers
Wahaj Advanced Structures▲ +0.5
Taibah Technologies▲ +0.4
SAMI Advanced Manuf.▲ +0.3
Al‑Salam Aerospace▲ +0.2
NADIA Aerospace▲ +0.6
Negative movers
Peninsula Aero Systems▼ ‑0.3
Tabuk Metal Forming▼ ‑0.4
Riyadh Electronics▼ ‑0.2
🔥 Heat‑map · Top 15 suppliers × 12 dimensions
Score legend: 4.5+ 4.0‑4.4 3.5‑3.9 3.0‑3.4 2.5‑2.9 < 2.5
| Supplier | Str | Tech | Mfg | QM | Ops | Fin | SC | WF | Gov | HSE | Loc | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al‑Salam Aerospace | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Taibah Technologies | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Advanced Electronics | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| SAMI Advanced Manuf. | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Wahaj Adv. Structures | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Al‑Rajhi Steel | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| Peninsula Munitions | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
| Nile Sat & Comms | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| Riyadh Aerodynamics | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| Jeddah Precision Works | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Al‑Kharj Composites | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 3.4 |
| NADIA Aerospace | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| Tabuk Metal Forming | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| Peninsula Aero Systems | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 2.1 |
💡 Portfolio insight: Manufacturing & Quality Management are the two weakest dimensions for the bottom quartile. Recommend cluster CAPA programme for Peninsula, NADIA and Tabuk with common assessor pool.
📐 Dimension‑level analytics (portfolio)
| Dimension | Weight | Portfolio avg | Top decile | Bottom decile | Range | Trend 6 m | Key must‑pass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🎯 Strategic Alignment | 10 % | 3.5 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 2.1 | ▲ +0.2 | Signed MoU present |
| 🔬 Technical Capability | 15 % | 3.6 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 | ▲ +0.3 | TRL ≥ 6 on top‑5 |
| 🏭 Manufacturing | 15 % | 3.7 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 2.4 | ▲ +0.1 | OEE ≥ 65 % |
| ✅ Quality Management | 10 % | 3.8 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 2.5 | ▲ +0.4 | AS9100 valid |
| ⚙️ Operational Capacity | 10 % | 3.3 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | → 0.0 | MES / ERP live |
| 💰 Financial Health | 10 % | 3.6 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.9 | ▼ ‑0.1 | DSCR > 1.2 |
| 🔗 Supply Chain | 5 % | 3.0 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.5 | ▲ +0.2 | ITAR / EAR posture |
| 👥 Workforce | 5 % | 3.5 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 1.8 | ▲ +0.5 | Nitaqat Green+ |
| 📜 Governance | 5 % | 3.7 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 | ▲ +0.3 | Sanctions clear |
| ⚠️ HSE & Security | 5 % | 3.4 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 1.8 | ▲ +0.2 | Facility clearance |
| 🇸🇦 Localization | 10 % | 3.5 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | ▲ +0.6 | Saudi content ≥ 40 % |
| Portfolio weighted | 100 % | 3.51 | 4.55 | 2.45 | 2.10 | ▲ +0.14 | 86 % compliance |
🗺️ Regional performance
Riyadh (38)3.7
Jeddah (16)3.6
Dhahran (14)3.4
Yanbu (10)3.5
Other (Tabuk, Al‑Kharj, Madinah) (64)3.3
📉 Portfolio score trajectory (6 quarters)
Portfolio has gained +0.31 pts over 6 quarters (compound + 9.7 %). Target for FY27 Q1: 3.65.
Side‑by‑side benchmark
Compare 2 suppliers · 11‑dimension radar
Overlay any two suppliers vs cohort average · all 11 EVO dimensions
Radar overlay
A
B
Cohort
Dimension‑by‑dimension breakdown
| Dimension | A | B | Gap |
|---|
Comparisons logged in audit trail · Aug 11, 2026 09:14 AST
Site‑Visit Mobile Companion Assessments view
Field kit for Technical Assessors · iOS + Android · Offline‑first · GPS geo‑tagging · EN + AR · 88‑item checklist · Last synced Aug 11, 2026 09:12 AST
Assessors on‑site
6
4 syncing · 2 offline
Visits today
3
Peninsula · Tabuk · Al‑Kharj
Checklist progress
62 %
55 / 88 items · Peninsula
Photos captured
142
all geo‑tagged
Discrepancies
7
2 critical · 5 minor
Pending sync
18
will upload when online
09:14
4G ▶ 🔋 84 %
📡 Offline — 4 items queued for sync · tap to sync
SAMI EVO Field
Peninsula Aero Systems
On‑site Verification Kit v3.2 · Aug 11, 2026
📷
Mfg 22 / 36
Quality 18 / 26
HSE 15 / 26
Checklist progress55 / 88 · 62 %
SV‑01 · Production line walk✓ Done
Live production line walk observations
📍 26.2769°N 50.1522°E📷 4 photos🎤 22 s
SV‑08 · CNC utilisation✓ Done
CNC utilisation observed on shop floor
target ≥70 %
SV‑15 · Cleanroom controls⚠ Must‑pass
Contamination controls in composite lay‑up area
📷 Take photo🎤 Voice📝 Note
SV‑24 · Inspection stations⛔ Fail flagged
2 inspection stations without current calibration certs
🚩 Discrepancy #3 logged · CAPA required
SV‑32 · FTQ evidence○ Next up
First‑time‑quality evidence at inspection
— 33 items remaining —
🎉
Site visit complete
Peninsula Aero Systems · Aug 11, 2026
Items done
5 / 5
Photos
0
Voice notes
0
Failures
0
Auto‑outputs queued
◻ Photo log + geo‑tag map (PDF)
◻ Discrepancy list → CAPA (Word)
◻ Assessor site memo (PDF)
◻ Chain‑of‑custody manifest (JSON)
Supplier sign‑off
Tap to capture supplier signature
‹ Back to checklist
SV‑15 · Must‑pass
Cleanroom controls
⚠ MUST‑PASS
Verify contamination controls in the composite lay‑up area: air quality, garment protocol, resin handling and cure log integrity.
Outcome
📍 GPS locked · 26.2769°N 50.1522°E · ±3 m
09:14 AST
Photos 0
+
Voice notes
Tap to record
Auto‑transcribed EN + AR
Written note
0 chars · auto‑saved offline
📋
Checklist
📷
Photos
🚩
Issues 7
🗺️
Map
🔄
Sync 18
📡 Assessors on‑site · live status
Auto‑refresh 60 s
| Assessor | Supplier | Progress | Location | Connection | Last sync | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Al‑Fahad | Peninsula Aero Systems | 55 / 88 (62 %) | Dhahran · 26.28°N | 📡 Offline | 3 min ago | 18 items |
| S. Al‑Ghamdi | Tabuk Metal Forming | 72 / 88 (82 %) | Tabuk · 28.38°N | 📶 4G | just now | synced |
| H. Al‑Zahrani (HSE) | Al‑Kharj Composites | 34 / 88 (39 %) | Al‑Kharj · 24.14°N | 📶 5G | 2 min ago | synced |
| R. Al‑Salem | Jeddah Precision Works | 88 / 88 (100 %) | Jeddah · 21.49°N | 📶 WiFi | 08:52 | ✓ signed |
| O. Al‑Mansour (Sec.) | Peninsula Aero Systems | n/a · security walk | Dhahran · 26.28°N | 📡 Offline | 5 min ago | 6 photos |
| M. George (Cyber) | Riyadh Aerodynamics | planned Aug 13 | Riyadh (HQ) | Standby | — | not started |
🚩 Discrepancy log (Peninsula)
7 OPEN
#1 · Critical · Q‑MC‑24
OEE 61 % observed — must‑pass ≥65 %. Assessor recorded 22‑s voice note.
09:04 · photo evidence × 3 · GPS locked
#3 · Critical · SV‑24
2 inspection stations without current calibration certs.
09:11 · photo × 2
#5 · Minor · SV‑48
Perimeter fence: 1 damaged section on north gate.
08:47 · photo × 1
#6 · Minor · SV‑59
PPE compliance ~92 % on production floor (target 100 %).
08:32 · photo × 2
+ 3 more minor issues (auto‑routed to CAPA)
📷 Evidence gallery · geo‑tagged
142 photos · 4 assessors
📍 SV‑01 Line walk
📍 SV‑08 CNC
🚩 SV‑24 Fail
📍 SV‑15 Cleanroom
📍 SV‑32 FTQ
⚠ SV‑48 Fence
📍 SV‑52
📍 SV‑63
+134
Every photo carries GPS coords, device ID, timestamp, and SHA‑256 hash for chain of custody.
🛠️ Field capabilities
📡
Offline‑first
Full checklist works with no signal. Auto‑sync on reconnect.
📍
Geo‑tagging
Every capture stamped with GPS coords + accuracy.
📷
Photo & video
Native camera, watermark, EXIF preserved, SHA‑256 hash.
🎤
Voice notes
Auto‑transcribed EN + AR · attached to checklist item.
🔏
Biometric lock
Face ID / fingerprint · device wipe on 3 failed attempts.
🇸🇦
EN + AR (RTL)
Bilingual questions, native right‑to‑left layout in AR.
🔋
Battery aware
Low‑power mode below 20 % · checklist priority preserved.
🗺️
Site map
Cached floor plan with pinned discrepancies + evidence.
✍️
e‑Signature
Supplier signs checklist on‑device at close of visit.
🔄 Sync queue · chain of custody
| Item | Type | Captured | Device | Hash (SHA‑256) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SV‑24 station cert photos (×2) | Photo | 09:11:42 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | a3f4…c9d1 | QUEUED |
| SV‑15 cleanroom photo | Photo | 09:07:18 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | 7bc0…e2f8 | QUEUED |
| SV‑01 voice note (22 s) | Audio | 09:04:03 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | e912—64a7 | QUEUED |
| Discrepancy #1 (OEE 61 %) | Log | 09:04:24 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | 2a1b…8e33 | QUEUED |
| SV‑08 CNC utilisation (68 %) | Numeric | 08:59:11 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | f470…5d2c | SYNCED |
| SV‑01 line walk (4 photos) | Photo | 08:47:36 | iPhone 15 Pro · NF | 18ce…9b04 | SYNCED |
🔐 Chain of custody: every field capture is hashed on device, signed with assessor certificate, and sealed against tampering. Backend rejects any item whose hash doesn't verify.
Site Visits Suppliers view
Week of Aug 3 – Aug 9, 2026 · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Wave 4
Scheduled (30d)
18
across 11 cities
Today
2
Sat, Aug 8 2026
This Week
4
Aug 3 – Aug 9
Completed YTD
62
96% on-time
At Risk
3
travel or access issue
Cancelled (30d)
1
re-schedule pending
Week Calendar Assessor visits Aug 3 – Aug 9, 2026
Mon 1 visit
3
09:00 – 13:00
Al-Rajhi Steel Ind.
📍 Dammam
FAFatima Al-Otaibi
Tue 1 visit
4
10:00 – 15:00
Peninsula Munitions
📍 Al-Kharj
RSReem Al-Salem
Wed 0 visits
5
Thu 1 visit
6
09:30 – 14:00
SAMI Advanced Manuf.
📍 Riyadh
MGMohammed Ghazi
Fri Weekend
7
Sat · TODAY 2 visits
8
09:00 – 12:30
Wahaj Defense Ind.
📍 Riyadh
MGMohammed Ghazi
14:00 – 17:00
NADIA Systems
📍 Riyadh
FAFatima Al-Otaibi
Sun 2 visits
9
09:00 – 13:00
Faisal Aero Mfg.
📍 Dammam
RSReem Al-Salem
10:30 – 15:00
Al-Kharj Wire & Cable
📍 Al-Kharj
OKOmar Khalid
Visits Map Next 30 days by city
2
Riyadh · today5
Dammam3
Jeddah2
Al-Kharj1
Jubail2
Buraidah1
Abha • travel1
Tabuk1
Hail
Today
Upcoming
Completed
At risk
Assessor Coverage Visits scheduled next 30 days
| Assessor | Home base | Visits | Load | On-time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MGMohammed Ghazi |
Riyadh | 5 | 5 / 6 |
96% |
FAFatima Al-Otaibi |
Dammam | 6 | 6 / 6 |
88% |
RSReem Al-Salem |
Riyadh | 4 | 4 / 6 |
94% |
OKOmar Khalid |
Jeddah | 2 | 2 / 6 |
100% |
SBSalma Benhaddou |
Riyadh | 1 | 1 / 6 |
100% |
Upcoming Visits Next 14 days
| Date | Supplier | City | Assessor | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 09:00 | Wahaj Defense Ind. | Riyadh | Mohammed Ghazi | Today |
| Aug 8, 14:00 | NADIA Systems | Riyadh | Fatima Al-Otaibi | At risk |
| Aug 9, 09:00 | Faisal Aero Mfg. | Dammam | Reem Al-Salem | Scheduled |
| Aug 9, 10:30 | Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Al-Kharj | Omar Khalid | Scheduled |
| Aug 10, 09:00 | Taibah Arms Mfg. | Al-Kharj | Reem Al-Salem | Scheduled |
| Aug 13, 10:00 | Abha Composites | Abha | Fatima Al-Otaibi | At risk |
| Aug 14, 09:30 | Jubail Petrochem Ind. | Jubail | Fatima Al-Otaibi | Scheduled |
| Aug 17, 10:00 | Hail Aerospace | Hail | Omar Khalid | Scheduled |
Recent Site Evidence Uploaded from mobile app
📸
SAMI Advanced Manuf. · Riyadh
Aug 6 · GPS tagged · by Mohammed Ghazi
24 photos
🎤
Peninsula Munitions · Al-Kharj
Aug 4 · Voice-to-text notes · by Reem Al-Salem
18 min
📸
Al-Rajhi Steel Ind. · Dammam
Aug 3 · GPS tagged · by Fatima Al-Otaibi
31 photos
📝
Nile Sat & Comms · Riyadh
Jul 30 · Assessor findings note · by Omar Khalid
6 pages
🎥
Alsalam Aircraft · Riyadh
Jul 28 · Line-walk video · by Salma Benhaddou
3 clips
Risk Alerts Risk view
Real-time risk register · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Refreshed Aug 08, 2026 04:12 UTC · Auto-poll 5 min
⚠ Risk Command Center
28 open alerts across 142 suppliers · 5 categories · auto-escalation active
Critical
4
action ≤ 24 h
High
9
action ≤ 7 d
Medium
11
plan ≤ 30 d
Low
4
monitor
Must-pass failures
7
Blocks award decision
Financial distress
4
Credit / audit / covenant
Concentration risk
75%
Top-5 share vs 65% target
Cyber & sanction
6
ISO 27001 gaps + sanction hits
HSE incidents
3
LTIFR 0.7 vs 0.5 target
Cleared this month
18
Avg time-to-clear 11.4 d
Alert Register 28
Must-Pass Failures 7
Financial Distress 4
Concentration & Supply 5
Cyber, Sanction & HSE 9
Alert Register 28 open alerts · sorted by severity + age · auto-populated from rule engine
| ID | Supplier | Category | Alert | Severity | Detected | Age | Owner | SLA | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA-001 | Peninsula Munitions | Must-pass | Recertification overdue · Tier 1 hold | Critical | Aug 01, 2026 | 7 d | R. Al-Salem | Breach | Escalated | |
| RA-002 | Riyadh Electronics | Must-pass | ISO 9001 expired · blocks award | Critical | Aug 04, 2026 | 4 d | A. Al-Dosari | Breach | Open | |
| RA-003 | Al-Hijra Startup | Documentation | 6 mandatory docs missing | Critical | Jul 28, 2026 | 11 d | R. Al-Salem | Breach | Open | |
| RA-004 | Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Delivery / OTIF | OTIF 62% · 8-D open · suspension risk | Critical | Jul 12, 2026 | 27 d | O. Khalid | Breach | Open | |
| RA-005 | Tabuk Precision Ltd. | Financial | Financial audit > 90 days late | High | Jul 05, 2026 | 34 d | Y. Al-Harbi | Due Aug 09 | In review | |
| RA-006 | Sahara Dynamics | HSE | LTIFR 1.2 · CAPA open · site incident | High | Jun 28, 2026 | 41 d | M. Ghazi | Due Aug 10 | In review | |
| RA-007 | Northern Precision | Financial | Cost variance +6.1% · re-negotiation open | High | Jul 08, 2026 | 31 d | Y. Al-Harbi | Due Aug 12 | In review | |
| RA-008 | Hail Defense Comp. | Certification | NADCAP audit not started | High | Jun 20, 2026 | 49 d | M. Ghazi | Due Aug 14 | Assigned | |
| RA-009 | Wahaj Defense Ind. | Localization | iktva 34% below 60% contract clause | High | Jul 20, 2026 | 19 d | R. Al-Salem | Due Aug 20 | In progress | |
| RA-010 | Riyadh Electronics | Quality | FTQ 88% · quality hold PO 22-4415 | High | Jul 30, 2026 | 9 d | A. Al-Dosari | Due Aug 15 | Open | |
| RA-011 | NADIA Defence Sys. | Cyber | ISO 27001 renewal due 68 d | Medium | Aug 02, 2026 | 6 d | A. Al-Dosari | Due Oct 15 | Assigned | |
| RA-012 | Peninsula Munitions | Concentration | Top-5 spend 75% above 65% target | Medium | Jul 15, 2026 | 24 d | SAMI Procurement | Plan Q4 | Under plan | |
| RA-013 | Madinah Composites | Governance | Ownership change filed · KYC refresh | Medium | Jul 30, 2026 | 9 d | N. Farsi / Compliance | Due Aug 30 | In review | |
| RA-014 | Jubail Marine Works | Certification | ISO 9001 renewal in 22 d | Medium | Aug 02, 2026 | 6 d | F. Al-Otaibi | Due Sep 05 | Assigned | |
| RA-015 | Al-Hijra Startup | Responsiveness | Response SLA 68% · escalation | Low | Jun 15, 2026 | 54 d | R. Al-Salem | Monitor | Monitoring |
Showing 15 of 28 open alerts · 4 critical · 9 high · 11 medium · 4 low
Risk Matrix Likelihood × Impact · open alerts
Rare
Unlikely
Possible
Likely
Almost cert.
Severe
0
1
2
3
1
Major
1
2
3
2
1
Moderate
0
2
3
2
1
Minor
1
1
1
1
0
Negligible
0
0
0
0
0
Critical
High
Medium
Low
Minimal
By Category Open alerts
Must-pass failures7
Financial distress4
Delivery / OTIF3
Quality / FTQ3
HSE / safety3
Cyber & sanction3
Localization / iktva2
Concentration / supply2
Governance / KYC1
Register Analytics Rolling 90 days
Alerts raised46
Alerts cleared18 · 39%
Escalated to Board4
Suppliers suspended2
SLA breaches4
Avg time-to-close11.4 days
Rules active18 (auto) + 4 (manual)
Alerts per rule (avg)2.5
False positives7% · target < 10%
Must-Pass Failures 7 open · each blocks award decision until cleared
| Supplier | Tier | Failed criterion | Dimension | Detected | Age | Blocking | Owner | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peninsula Munitions | Tier 1 | Recertification overdue 7 d | Governance & Compliance | Aug 01 | 7 d | Munitions frame renewal (SAR 6.4 M) | R. Al-Salem | Start re-assess |
| Riyadh Electronics | Tier 2 | ISO 9001 expired | Quality Management | Aug 04 | 4 d | All future awards | A. Al-Dosari | Force re-cert |
| Riyadh Electronics | Tier 2 | FTQ 88% quality hold | Quality Management | Jul 30 | 9 d | PO 22-4415 (SAR 1.4 M) | A. Al-Dosari | CAPA + rescreen |
| Wahaj Defense Ind. | Tier 2 | iktva 34% below 60% clause | Localization Potential | Jul 20 | 19 d | Contract renewal Q4 | R. Al-Salem | Localization plan |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Tier 2 | OTIF < 85% (62% actual) | Supply Chain Resilience | Jul 12 | 27 d | Program A deliveries | O. Khalid | 8-D response |
| Al-Hijra Startup | Prospect | 6 mandatory docs missing | Governance / Legal / Financial | Jul 28 | 11 d | Assessment stalled at doc stage | R. Al-Salem | Reminder + coach |
| Hail Defense Comp. | Tier 2 | NADCAP audit not started | Quality Management | Jun 20 | 49 d | Promotion Q2 2027 | M. Ghazi | Kick-off audit |
Blocked Award Value SAR M frozen behind must-pass gaps
Peninsula Munitions renewalSAR 6.4 M
Wahaj Defense contract Q4SAR 4.1 M
Riyadh Electronics PO 22-4415SAR 1.4 M
Al-Kharj Program A ext.SAR 3.2 M
Hail Defense promotion pipelineSAR 12 M (est)
Al-Hijra pilot awardSAR 1.8 M (est)
Total blocked valueSAR 28.9 M
% of YTD pipeline7.6%
CAPA / Override Workflow Corrective action steps
CAPA open11
8-D reports in progress3
Board overrides granted YTD2
Overrides denied YTD3
Avg CAPA close21 days
Repeat must-pass suppliers3
Suspensions triggered YTD2
Reinstatement decisions1 pending
Financial Distress 4 open alerts · credit / audit / covenant / liquidity
| Supplier | Signal | Metric | Source | Detected | Severity | Exposure (SAR M) | Owner | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tabuk Precision Ltd. | Audit gap | 2025 audit > 90 d late | Portal filing | Jul 05 | High | 27.4 | Y. Al-Harbi | Escrow deposit |
| Northern Precision | Cost variance | +6.1% vs baseline PO | ERP | Jul 08 | High | 4.8 | Y. Al-Harbi | Renegotiate |
| Al-Hijra Startup | Liquidity | Cash runway < 90 d (est) | Voluntary disclosure | Jul 22 | Medium | 1.8 | Y. Al-Harbi | Milestone payments |
| Peninsula Munitions | Covenant | DSCR 1.1 vs 1.3 covenant | Bank ref. | Jul 26 | Medium | 6.4 | Y. Al-Harbi | Guarantor added |
Portfolio Financial Health Composite scoring
Credit score (Simah / D&B avg)72 / 100
Audited financials on file92% of Tier 1+2
Overdue audits3
Covenant breaches1
Payment terms extended4 suppliers
Escrow / guarantees heldSAR 8.2 M
Cash-flow-restricted suppliers3
Insurance / bond coverage89% of Tier 1
Exposure Map Total exposure SAR 40.4 M
Tabuk Precision Ltd.SAR 27.4 M
Peninsula MunitionsSAR 6.4 M
Northern PrecisionSAR 4.8 M
Al-Hijra StartupSAR 1.8 M
Total exposureSAR 40.4 M
% of YTD spend18.5%
Recommended reserveSAR 3.5 M (~8.7%)
Concentration & Supply Chain Risk Top-5 share 75% vs 65% target · single-source items 34 · geographic clustering 62%
Top-5 supplier share 75%
Category exposure · detected Jul 15
Al-Salam (23%) + Taibah (20%) + Riyadh Defense (13%) + Jeddah Aero (10%) + Riyadh Elite (9%) = 75% of SAR 142 M awarded YTD. Above 65% board tolerance. Recommend diversification plan Q4.
Single-source · Composite fuselage panels
Category: Aerostructures · Al-Salam sole supplier
4 line items, SAR 32 M frame, no qualified alternate. Jeddah Aero at 68% capability, needs +6 pt uplift. Approve dev. plan.
Single-source · High-precision optics
Category: Avionics · imported (Germany, France)
3 line items, SAR 8.2 M spend YTD, 100% imported. No Saudi qualified supplier. Recommend targeted Directory search + JV path.
Geographic clustering · Riyadh region 62%
Continuity risk · detected Jun 30
88 of 142 suppliers HQ in Riyadh + Al-Kharj. Single-region event impacts most delivery capacity. Encourage Eastern + Western onboarding.
Raw material bottleneck · aerospace-grade Al alloy
Global supply Jul 2026
Lead time 22 wk → 34 wk. Impacts Al-Salam, Jeddah, Faisal, Madinah. Consider strategic reserve or alternate spec.
Logistics choke point · Jeddah port congestion
Monitor
Avg dwell time up 2.4 d in Jul. Faisal Aero + Al-Salam most exposed. No action, monitor Aug.
Concentration by Category Top-1 share of spend
AerostructuresAl-Salam · 62%
MunitionsTaibah · 65%
Land SystemsRiyadh Defense · 57%
C4I & CyberRiyadh Elite · 57%
AvionicsFaisal Aero · 34%
Naval & MarineJubail Marine · 52%
Categories above 50% single-supplier5 of 6
Diversification Actions Recommended by category
AerostructuresPromote Jeddah + Madinah
MunitionsOnboard 2 in Eastern region
Land SystemsPromote Dammam Land Tech
C4I & CyberElevate NADIA + fund JV
Optics (single-source)Directory search + JV path
Raw material Al alloyStrategic reserve 6 mo
Geographic · Western regionScout 12 new prospects
Board tolerance next reviewSep 26, 2026
Cyber, Sanction & HSE Alerts 9 open · information security, regulatory, safety and reputational risks
| Supplier | Domain | Alert | Severity | Detected | Age | Owner | Status | SLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahara Dynamics | HSE | Lost-time incident · hand injury · CAPA | High | Jun 28 | 41 d | M. Ghazi | CAPA open | Due Aug 10 |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | Cyber | ISO 27001 renewal due 68 d | Medium | Aug 02 | 6 d | A. Al-Dosari | Assigned | Due Oct 15 |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | Cyber | ISO 27001 v2 upgrade required · contract clause | Medium | Jul 24 | 15 d | A. Al-Dosari | In progress | Due Nov 15 |
| Riyadh Electronics | Cyber | Endpoint vuln · CVE-2026-2145 unpatched | High | Aug 05 | 3 d | A. Al-Dosari | Open | Due Aug 12 |
| Madinah Composites | Governance | Ownership change · KYC re-screen | Medium | Jul 30 | 9 d | Compliance | In review | Due Aug 30 |
| Al-Ahsa Precision | HSE | Near-miss · lifting equipment | Low | Jul 18 | 21 d | M. Ghazi | Documented | Monitor |
| Jubail Marine Works | HSE | Environmental · minor spill 30 L | Low | Jul 22 | 17 d | F. Al-Otaibi | Closed pending audit | Aug 30 |
| Northern Precision | Sanction | Sanction sweep · all clear (info) | Low | Aug 02 | 6 d | Compliance | Clear | Close |
| Al-Hijra Startup | Cyber | No cyber policy on file | High | Jul 28 | 11 d | R. Al-Salem | Requested | Due Aug 20 |
Cyber Posture Portfolio coverage
ISO 27001 certified62% · 88 sup.
Cyber clause in contract78% · 30 ctr.
MFA enforced (portal)96%
Endpoint AV coverage88%
Phishing sim pass rate82%
Open cyber alerts4
Data breach incidents (12m)0
Sanction & Screening Regulatory sweep
Last screening runAug 02, 2026
Suppliers screened142 / 142
Positive hits0
Grey-list watch1
Beneficial owners resolved96%
KYC refresh due 30 d8
Ownership changes tracked3 YTD
Next sweepAug 16, 2026
HSE & Safety Rolling 12 months
LTIFR (per 200 K hrs)0.7 (target 0.5)
Lost-time incidents3
Near-miss reports28
Environmental incidents2
HSE audits completed38 of 42 planned
Safety training compliance92%
HSE certifications expiring 90 d4
CAPA closure rate86% within SLA
Relationships & Awards Suppliers view
Contract awards · Spend · Saudi content contribution · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Refreshed Aug 08, 2026
Contract Awards 42
Spend Analytics 142
Saudi Content / iktva 67
Relationship Health 55
Contract Lifecycle 38
Awarded YTD
SAR 142 M
18 contracts · 12 suppliers
Total spend YTD
SAR 218 M
POs 342 · avg 638 K
Pipeline (3-yr)
SAR 380 M
Weighted 276 M
Saudi content
64%
iktva weighted · target 60%
Contracts up for renewal
9
Next 90 d · SAR 62 M value
Relationship health
4.1/ 5
CSAT · NPS +38
Contract Awards YTD 42 awards · SAR 142 M · Cycle 2026 (Jan–Aug)
| # | Supplier | Contract | Program | Value (SAR M) | Awarded | Ends | Local % | Sponsor | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAAl-Salam Aerospace | Composite parts frame | Aero JV | 32.0 | Feb 12, 2026 | Feb 11, 2029 | 71% | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | Active | |
| 2 | TATaibah Arms Mfg. | Munitions casings | Munitions 2026 | 28.5 | Mar 05, 2026 | Mar 04, 2028 | 78% | SAMI Munitions | Active | |
| 3 | RDRiyadh Defense Elite | CNC machined parts | Land Systems 2027 | 18.2 | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 21, 2028 | 72% | SAMI Land Systems | Active | |
| 4 | JEJeddah Aero Elite | Composite panels | Aero JV | 14.4 | May 03, 2026 | May 02, 2028 | 68% | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | Active | |
| 5 | RYRiyadh Elite Sys. | SW development frame | C4I sovereignty | 12.1 | May 20, 2026 | May 19, 2029 | 64% | SAMI C4I | Active | |
| 6 | DLDammam Land Tech | Hydraulic sub-assembly | Land Systems 2027 | 9.8 | Jun 10, 2026 | Jun 09, 2028 | 66% | SAMI Land Systems | Active | |
| 7 | FAFaisal Aero Mfg. | Avionics wire harness | Aero JV | 7.6 | Jun 25, 2026 | Jun 24, 2027 | 62% | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | Active | |
| 8 | PMPeninsula Munitions | Warhead components | Munitions 2026 | 6.4 | Feb 28, 2025 | Oct 01, 2026 | 58% | SAMI Munitions | Renewal at risk | |
| 9 | NSNADIA Defence Sys. | Cyber tooling | C4I sovereignty | 5.9 | Jul 12, 2026 | Jul 11, 2027 | 52% | SAMI C4I | Pending signature | |
| 10 | SDSahara Dynamics | Hydraulic pilot | Land Systems 2027 | 3.2 | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 29, 2027 | 60% | SAMI Land Systems | Conditional |
Showing top 10 of 42 · Total awarded SAR 142 M · Avg deal SAR 3.4 M · Avg localization 64%
Awards by Category SAR M · YTD
Aerostructures54.0 M
Munitions34.9 M
Land Systems31.2 M
C4I & Cyber18.0 M
Avionics & Elec.3.9 M
Total awardedSAR 142.0 M
Vs plan YTD106% · ▲ 8 M
Concentration Risk Top-supplier share of spend
Al-Salam AerospaceSAR 32 M · 23%
Taibah Arms Mfg.28 M · 20%
Riyadh Defense Elite18 M · 13%
Jeddah Aero Elite14 M · 10%
Riyadh Elite Sys.12 M · 9%
Other (37 suppliers)36 M · 25%
Top-5 share75% · above 65% target
Renewals · Next 90 days 9 contracts · SAR 62 M
Peninsula MunitionsOct 01 · SAR 6.4 M
Northern PrecisionOct 15 · SAR 4.8 M
Al-Kharj Wire & CableOct 22 · SAR 3.2 M
Faisal Aero Mfg.Nov 05 · SAR 7.6 M
NADIA Defence Sys.Nov 15 · SAR 5.9 M
Jubail Marine WorksNov 22 · SAR 2.1 M
Sahara DynamicsNov 30 · SAR 3.2 M
Riyadh ElectronicsDec 08 · SAR 1.4 M
Tabuk Precision Ltd.Dec 15 · SAR 27.4 M
Spend Analytics Total spend YTD SAR 218 M · 342 POs · 142 suppliers touched
| Supplier | Sector | POs YTD | Spend (SAR M) | Avg PO (K) | Local content M | Payment days | Discount % | Trend YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Salam Aerospace | Aerostructures | 38 | 48.2 | 1,268 | 34.2 | 42 | 2.1% | ▲ 22% |
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | Munitions | 42 | 36.8 | 876 | 28.7 | 45 | 1.8% | ▲ 18% |
| Riyadh Defense Elite | Land Systems | 26 | 22.4 | 862 | 16.1 | 48 | 1.4% | ▲ 12% |
| Jeddah Aero Elite | Aerostructures | 22 | 18.1 | 823 | 12.3 | 44 | 1.6% | ▲ 15% |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | C4I | 19 | 16.5 | 868 | 10.6 | 50 | 1.0% | ▲ 9% |
| Dammam Land Tech | Land Systems | 14 | 12.6 | 900 | 8.3 | 49 | 1.2% | ▲ 8% |
| Faisal Aero Mfg. | Aerostructures | 18 | 11.2 | 622 | 6.9 | 46 | 1.1% | ▬ 0% |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | C4I | 12 | 8.4 | 700 | 4.4 | 52 | 0.9% | ▲ 11% |
| Peninsula Munitions | Munitions | 16 | 6.8 | 425 | 3.9 | 58 | 0.6% | ▼ 8% |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Avionics | 21 | 5.2 | 248 | 2.9 | 62 | 0.4% | ▼ 15% |
Spend by Sector YTD · SAR M
Aerostructures78 M · 36%
Munitions44 M · 20%
Land Systems39 M · 18%
C4I & Cyber29 M · 13%
Avionics & Elec.22 M · 10%
Naval & Marine6 M · 3%
Total spend YTDSAR 218 M
Payment & Terms Portfolio wide
Avg payment days48 (target 45)
On-time invoicing rate94%
Early payment discount capturedSAR 2.4 M
Late payments > 60 d17 (5%)
Disputed invoices6 open · SAR 1.1 M
SME spend share32% · target 40%
Payment cycle CSAT (supplier)3.8 / 5
Saudi Content Contribution iktva-weighted · 67 iktva-certified suppliers of 142 · target 60%
| Supplier | Sector | iktva % Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Delta YTD | Saudi labor % | Local sourcing M | Cert status | Next filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | Munitions | 78% | 75% | 71% | +7 pt | 82% | 22.4 | Certified | Q4 2026 |
| Al-Salam Aerospace | Aerostructures | 71% | 69% | 65% | +6 pt | 74% | 34.2 | Certified | Q1 2027 |
| Riyadh Defense Elite | Land Systems | 72% | 70% | 68% | +4 pt | 78% | 13.1 | Certified | Q1 2027 |
| Jeddah Aero Elite | Aerostructures | 68% | 65% | 62% | +6 pt | 72% | 9.8 | Certified | Q4 2026 |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | C4I | 64% | 61% | 58% | +6 pt | 88% | 7.7 | Certified | Q1 2027 |
| Dammam Land Tech | Land Systems | 66% | 63% | 60% | +6 pt | 76% | 8.3 | Certified | Q1 2027 |
| Faisal Aero Mfg. | Aerostructures | 62% | 60% | 57% | +5 pt | 68% | 4.9 | Certified | Q4 2026 |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | C4I | 52% | 48% | 42% | +10 pt | 66% | 3.1 | Renewal | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Wahaj Defense Ind. | Avionics | 34% | 28% | 24% | +10 pt | 58% | 1.4 | Refresh | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Peninsula Munitions | Munitions | 58% | 61% | 62% | −4 pt | 64% | 3.9 | Expired | Overdue 7 d |
Portfolio Trajectory Weighted iktva
2024 baseline42%
2025 close54%
Q1 202658%
Q2 202662%
Q3 2026 (current)64%
FY 2026 forecast66%
2030 target75%
Gap to 2030−11 pt
iktva Movers Q3 vs Q1 YTD
NADIA Defence Sys.▲ +10 pt
Wahaj Defense Ind.▲ +10 pt
Taibah Arms Mfg.▲ +7 pt
Al-Salam Aerospace▲ +6 pt
Jeddah Aero Elite▲ +6 pt
Peninsula Munitions▼ −4 pt
Al-Kharj Wire▼ −3 pt
Portfolio delta YTD+6 pt
Filings & Compliance Regulatory
iktva declarations filed YTD67
Filings pending12
Filings overdue3
Nitaqat Platinum band18 suppliers
Nitaqat Green27 suppliers
Nitaqat Yellow / Red4 suppliers
GAMI audits open2
Local content M attributableSAR 139 M
Strategic Relationships 55 approved suppliers · relationship depth & two-way health
| Supplier | Depth | Since | Executive sponsor | Supplier exec | CSAT (SAMI→Sup) | CSAT (Sup→SAMI) | NPS | Interactions QTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Salam Aerospace | ♥♥♥♥♥ Strategic | Q2 2022 | Faisal Al-Dossari | Nasser Farsi (CEO) | 4.5 | 4.6 | +52 | 14 |
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | ♥♥♥♥♥ Strategic | Q4 2022 | Khaled Al-Mutairi | Ahmed Taibah (MD) | 4.4 | 4.5 | +48 | 11 |
| Riyadh Defense Elite | ♥♥♥♥♥ Preferred | Q1 2023 | Faisal Al-Dossari | Turki Al-Rasheed | 4.2 | 4.3 | +42 | 9 |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | ♥♥♥♥♥ Preferred | Q3 2023 | Khaled Al-Mutairi | Adnan Al-Dosari | 4.1 | 4.2 | +38 | 8 |
| Jeddah Aero Elite | ♥♥♥♥♥ Preferred | Q4 2023 | Faisal Al-Dossari | Hala Al-Qahtani | 4.1 | 4.0 | +35 | 7 |
| Dammam Land Tech | ♥♥♥♥♥ Preferred | Q2 2024 | Faisal Al-Dossari | Mohammed Al-Zahrani | 4.0 | 4.1 | +34 | 6 |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | ♥♥♥♥♥ Approved | Q1 2025 | Khaled Al-Mutairi | Aisha Naji | 3.9 | 4.0 | +28 | 5 |
| Sahara Dynamics | ♥♥♥♥♥ Developing | Q3 2025 | Faisal Al-Dossari | Mansour Dyn. | 3.9 | 3.9 | +22 | 6 |
| Peninsula Munitions | ♥♥♥♥♥ Approved | Q4 2022 | Khaled Al-Mutairi | Salim Peninsula | 3.6 | 3.8 | +12 | 4 |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | ♥♥♥♥♥ At risk | Q1 2024 | Omar Khalid | Abdullah Al-Kharj | 3.2 | 3.5 | +2 | 3 |
Relationship Depth Mix 55 approved
★ Strategic10 · 18%
Preferred18 · 33%
Approved16 · 29%
Developing8 · 15%
At risk3 · 5%
Strategic-tier promotions YTD3
Downgrades YTD2
Avg relationship tenure2.3 years
Two-Way CSAT / NPS Portfolio
SAMI → Supplier CSAT4.0 / 5
Supplier → SAMI CSAT4.1 / 5
Portfolio NPS+38
Executive touchpoints QTD73
Joint innovation sessions18 held YTD
Supplier of the Year 2025Al-Salam Aerospace
Top complaint (supplier voice)Payment cycle length
Top praisePortal + assessor quality
Contract Lifecycle 38 active contracts · SAR 218 M lifetime value · avg tenure 2.1 yr
| Contract | Supplier | Value (SAR M) | Drawn % | Started | Ends | Days left | Amendments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aero JV composite parts | Al-Salam Aerospace | 32.0 | 42% | Feb 12, 2026 | Feb 11, 2029 | 917 | 2 | Active |
| Munitions casings | Taibah Arms Mfg. | 28.5 | 58% | Mar 05, 2026 | Mar 04, 2028 | 573 | 1 | Active |
| Land Systems CNC frame | Riyadh Defense Elite | 18.2 | 62% | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 21, 2028 | 621 | 0 | Active |
| Aero JV composite panels | Jeddah Aero Elite | 14.4 | 48% | May 03, 2026 | May 02, 2028 | 632 | 0 | Active |
| C4I sovereignty SW | Riyadh Elite Sys. | 12.1 | 32% | May 20, 2026 | May 19, 2029 | 1,015 | 1 | Active |
| Warhead components | Peninsula Munitions | 6.4 | 86% | Feb 28, 2025 | Oct 01, 2026 | 54 | 3 | Renewal risk |
| Hydraulic sub-assembly | Dammam Land Tech | 9.8 | 28% | Jun 10, 2026 | Jun 09, 2028 | 670 | 0 | Active |
| Avionics wire harness | Faisal Aero Mfg. | 7.6 | 34% | Jun 25, 2026 | Jun 24, 2027 | 320 | 0 | Active |
| Cyber tooling | NADIA Defence Sys. | 5.9 | 18% | Jul 12, 2026 | Jul 11, 2027 | 337 | 0 | Pending sig. |
| Hydraulic pilot | Sahara Dynamics | 3.2 | 6% | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 29, 2027 | 355 | 0 | Conditional |
Lifecycle Snapshot 38 contracts
Active27 · 71%
Pending signature4 · 11%
Renewal at risk3 · 8%
Closed / expired4 · 11%
Average tenure2.1 years
Avg draw-down at maturity88%
Renewal success rate (12m)82%
Amendments & Change Orders Rolling 12m
Amendments filed21
Value adjustment total+SAR 12.4 M
Scope-only changes9
Price re-negotiations5 open
Termination notices1
Avg amendment approval time9.4 days
Auto-renew clauses active14 contracts
Force majeure invoked0
Legal & Governance CLM compliance
Signed via DocuSign96%
Bilingual EN / AR versions100%
Sanctions clause coverage100%
iktva clause coverage94%
Cyber clause coverage78%
Dispute resolution KSA venue100%
Legal review SLA (5 d)92% within SLA
Open disputes2
Overview & Summary Executive dashboard
EVO program · Cycle 2026 Q3 · As of Aug 08, 2026 · Prepared for SAMI Board · Auto refresh 15 min
EVO Program Health · August 2026
142 suppliers on platform · 55 approved · 21 award-ready · SAR 380 M pipeline
Cycle 2026 Q3
Wave 4
Vision 2030 aligned
SAMI Board pack
82/100
▲ 3 pt vs Q2 · Portfolio scorecard
64%
Localization weighted · target 60%
Suppliers indexed
142
+18 QTD
Assessments in flight
89
Wave 4
Tier 1 shortlist
21
+4 promoted YTD
Awarded YTD
SAR 142 M
18 contracts
Cost savings YTD
SAR 94 M
vs plan 80 M ▲ 17%
At-risk suppliers
6
Watchlist ▲ 2 QoQ
Approval rate
72%
55 approved of 76 completed
Cycle-time (avg)
78 days
SLA 90 d · ▼ 6 d QoQ
OTIF (rolling 3m)
91%
Target 90% · ▲ 2 pt
Overdue re-assess
3
Riyadh Elec., Peninsula, Al-Kharj
iktva uplift
+7.2pt
Avg via dev. programs
Board SLA compliance
96%
Reporting on-time · 12/12 months
Executive Highlights This week
✓ Al-Salam Aerospace Aero JV award conditional (SAR 120 M)iktva plan endorsed, decision by Sep 15. Weighted pipeline share 37%.
✓ 4 suppliers promoted Tier 2 → Tier 1 YTDVs FY target of 6 promotions. Q4 pipeline forecasts +6 more candidates.
i Cost savings YTD SAR 94 M (117% of plan)Localization 42 M · Sourcing 28 M · Dev. ROI 15 M · Consolidation 9 M. Track to close year at SAR 128 M.
⚠ Peninsula Munitions recertification overdue 7 dTier 1 status at risk before contract renewal Oct 01. Escalation to Board.
▼ Al-Kharj Wire & Cable scorecard ▼ 7 ptOTIF 62%, 8-D open. Suspension risk if not recovered by Dec 15.
Assessment Funnel Cycle 2026 Q3 · conversion 16.2%
Invited
142
Questionnaire
125
Documents
102
Site visit
74
Scoring
50
Review
34
Approved
23
SLA conversion target20% · gap −3.8 pt
Portfolio by Sector 142 suppliers
142
Suppliers
Avionics & Electronics 38
Land Systems 29
Munitions & Weapons 25
Aerostructures 20
Naval & Marine 17
C4I & Cyber 13
Tier Mix Post-assessment pool 55
Tier 1 shortlist21 · 38%
Tier 2 develop13 · 24%
Re-assess pool7 · 13%
Watchlist9 · 16%
Pipeline / Conditional5 · 9%
Promotions Tier 2 → Tier 1 YTD4
Downgrades / suspensions YTD2
Avg EVO score (Tier 1)3.94 / 5
Vision 2030 Posture Weighted by award value
Localization64% / 60%
SME participation32% / 40%
Saudization (Nitaqat)58% / 55%
Women in workforce22% / 30%
R&D spend of revenue3.4% / 4%
iktva-certified suppliers67 / 142
V2030 Balanced Scorecard3 of 6 above target
Cost Savings YTD SAR M · vs plan
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAug
Actual YTDSAR 94 M
Plan YTDSAR 80 M
Variance+SAR 14 M · +17%
FY forecastSAR 128 M
Top contributorLocalization CS1 · 42 M
Cycle-time & SLA Avg 78 d vs SLA 90 d
Invited → Q’naire6.2 d
Q’naire → Documents9.8 d
Documents → Site15.1 d
Site → Scoring17.4 d
Scoring → Review12.7 d
Review → Approval16.8 d
Total avg cycle78.0 days
SLA compliance86%
Risk & Compliance Watchlist and expirations
Watchlist · total9
Critical severity2
Warning severity5
Certifications expiring ≤ 30 d17
Missing mandatory docs41 (19 suppliers)
Cyber ISO 27001 coverage62% of C4I
HSE incidents (rolling 12m)0.7 LTIFR
Sanction screening · last runAug 02 · all clear
Data-room requests open3 (Board pack)
Upcoming Milestones · Next 30 days Board-relevant events
Aug 12, 2026 · in 4 d
Q3 QBR – Taibah Arms Mfg.
Scorecard ▲ 4, munitions frame renewal on agenda
Aug 14, 2026 · in 6 d
Jeddah Aero Elite – Tier 1 approval
Assessment scoring closed, sign-off pending
Aug 19, 2026 · in 11 d
Q3 QBR – Al-Salam Aerospace
Aero JV award decision approach · SAR 120 M
Aug 22, 2026 · in 14 d
Wahaj Defense – Site re-visit
iktva refresh, Tier 2 develop closure
Aug 26, 2026 · in 18 d
SAMI Board Pack – September edition due
Publish scoreboard + localization + cost savings
Sep 05, 2026 · in 28 d
Jubail Marine – Doc refresh + ISO 9001 renewal
Tier 2 develop · F. Al-Otaibi
Top Suppliers Snapshot By EVO scorecard · Q3 2026
| # | Supplier | Sector | Score | Trend | Loc % | Pipeline SAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taibah Arms Mfg. | Munitions | 92 | ▲ 4 | 78% | 95 M |
| 2 | Al-Salam Aerospace | Aerostructures | 89 | ▲ 2 | 71% | 120 M |
| 3 | Riyadh Defense Elite | Land Systems | 86 | ▲ 1 | 72% | 55 M |
| 4 | Riyadh Elite Sys. | C4I | 84 | ▲ 3 | 64% | 78 M |
| 5 | Jeddah Aero Elite | Aerostructures | 82 | ▬ 0 | 68% | — |
| 6 | Dammam Land Tech | Land Systems | 80 | ▲ 2 | 66% | — |
| 7 | Faisal Aero Mfg. | Aerostructures | 78 | ▬ 0 | 62% | — |
| 8 | NADIA Defence Sys. | C4I | 74 | ▲ 5 | 52% | — |
Board Pack Auto-generated
Current cycle deck combines Scoreboard, Localization, Cost Savings, and this Overview.
Last generatedAug 08, 04:12 UTC
Next scheduledAug 26, 2026
Data Health Freshness & sources
Supplier recordsFresh
Documents indexed3,847 (28 in queue)
ZATCA / GAMI syncAug 08 04:12
Nitaqat feedAug 07 22:30
HRSD feedAug 05 (3 d)
OCR pipelineOnline
Storage used48 / 200 GB
Team Load Assessor bandwidth this month
R. Al-Salem78%
M. Ghazi86%
F. Al-Otaibi96%
A. Al-Dosari72%
O. Khalid58%
Team avg utilization78%
At capacityF. Al-Otaibi
Quick Actions Board-tier tools
Performance & Development Suppliers view
Post-award performance monitoring · Development programs · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Refreshed Aug 08, 2026
Supplier Scorecards 55
Operational KPIs 7
Development Programs 11
Maturity Progression 55
QBR & Feedback 9
Portfolio scorecard
82/100
▲ 3 vs Q2
OTIF (rolling 3m)
91%
Target 90% · 5 above / 2 below
Quality PPM
340
▼ 22 vs target 300
Cost variance
−1.8%
Favorable · SAR 8.4 M YTD
Dev. programs active
11
SAR 4.6 M invested
At-risk suppliers
6
3 quality · 2 delivery · 1 HSE
Supplier Scorecards 55 approved suppliers · Q3 2026 composite score · 6-KPI weighted
| # | Supplier | Tier | Composite | Quality | Delivery | Cost | Responsiveness | Innovation | Sustainability | Trend Q3 vs Q2 | Grade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TATaibah Arms Mfg. | Tier 1 | 92 | 96 | 94 | 88 | 93 | 85 | 92 | ▲ 4 | A+ | |
| 2 | SAAl-Salam Aerospace | Tier 1 | 89 | 93 | 91 | 84 | 87 | 91 | 88 | ▲ 2 | A | |
| 3 | RDRiyadh Defense Elite | Tier 1 | 86 | 88 | 89 | 82 | 86 | 82 | 87 | ▲ 1 | A | |
| 4 | RYRiyadh Elite Sys. | Tier 1 | 84 | 87 | 85 | 78 | 88 | 92 | 77 | ▲ 3 | A- | |
| 5 | JEJeddah Aero Elite | Tier 1 | 82 | 84 | 86 | 79 | 82 | 78 | 85 | ▬ 0 | A- | |
| 6 | DLDammam Land Tech | Tier 1 | 80 | 82 | 84 | 76 | 80 | 74 | 82 | ▲ 2 | B+ | |
| 7 | FAFaisal Aero Mfg. | Tier 1 | 78 | 80 | 82 | 74 | 76 | 72 | 82 | ▬ 0 | B+ | |
| 8 | NSNADIA Defence Sys. | Tier 2 | 74 | 76 | 78 | 72 | 78 | 68 | 72 | ▲ 5 | B | |
| 9 | SDSahara Dynamics | Tier 2 | 68 | 62 | 74 | 70 | 68 | 64 | 72 | ▲ 6 | C+ | |
| 10 | AKAl-Kharj Wire & Cable | Tier 2 | 58 | 66 | 52 | 68 | 60 | 50 | 58 | ▼ 7 | C- |
Showing 1–10 of 55 · Portfolio avg 82 (▲ 3 vs Q2) · Weighting: Quality 25% · Delivery 25% · Cost 15% · Responsiveness 15% · Innovation 10% · Sustainability 10%
Grade Distribution Q3 2026 · 55 suppliers
A+ / A Excellent14 · 25%
A- Strong9 · 16%
B+ / B Solid18 · 33%
C+ / C Adequate8 · 15%
C- / D At risk6 · 11%
Portfolio gradeB+ (82)
Vs benchmark cohort+4 pt above
Top 5 Movers Q3 vs Q2 delta
Al-Kharj Wire & Cable▼ 7 pt
Peninsula Munitions▼ 4 pt
Sahara Dynamics▲ 6 pt
NADIA Defence Sys.▲ 5 pt
Taibah Arms Mfg.▲ 4 pt
Improvers this quarter31 suppliers
Decliners this quarter12 suppliers
Category Averages Portfolio wide
Quality85
Delivery (OTIF)86
Cost / value79
Responsiveness82
Innovation74
Sustainability / HSE80
Weakest dimensionInnovation · 74
Operational KPI Panel Rolling 3-month trend · target vs actual · portfolio wide
| KPI | Definition | Target | Actual Q3 | Actual Q2 | Trend | Below-target suppliers | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIF | On-time, in-full delivery | ≥ 90% | 91% | 89% | ▲ 2 | 7 of 55 | On target |
| Quality PPM | Defects per million | ≤ 300 | 340 | 362 | ▲ 22 | 11 of 55 | Below target |
| FTQ | First-time quality yield | ≥ 97% | 97.4% | 96.8% | ▲ 0.6 | 5 of 55 | On target |
| Cost variance | Actual vs baseline PO price | ≤ 0% | −1.8% | −0.9% | ▲ 0.9 | 4 of 55 | Favorable |
| Response SLA | RFQ & NCR reply < 48 h | ≥ 95% | 96% | 93% | ▲ 3 | 6 of 55 | On target |
| HSE incidents | LTIFR per 200 K hours | ≤ 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ▼ 0.2 | 3 of 55 | Above target |
| Localization | iktva weighted | ≥ 60% | 64% | 62% | ▲ 2 | 19 of 55 | Above target |
KPI Heatmap · Top 8 suppliers Q3 2026 · 5 = best, 1 = worst
| Supplier | OTIF | PPM | FTQ | Cost | Resp. | HSE | Localiz. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Al-Salam Aerospace | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Riyadh Defense Elite | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Jeddah Aero Elite | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Faisal Aero Mfg. | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Sahara Dynamics | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
5 excellent
4 strong
3 adequate
2 weak
1 poor
At-Risk Actions 6 suppliers below KPI threshold
Al-Kharj Wire & CableOTIF 62% · 8-D open
Peninsula MunitionsPPM 780 · audit due
Sahara DynamicsHSE LTIFR 1.2 · CAPA open
Riyadh ElectronicsFTQ 88% · quality hold
Northern PrecisionCost var. +6.1% · re-neg
Al-Hijra StartupResponse 68% · escalation
Actions open14 (11 CAPA, 3 8-D)
Avg time-to-close CAPA21 days
Development Programs 11 active programs · SAR 4.6 M committed · SAMI co-funding 39%
| Supplier | Program | Category | Start | Target close | Progress | Mentor | SAMI co-fund | Total (SAR K) | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSahara Dynamics | HSE excellence sprint | Safety | May 12, 2026 | Sep 30, 2026 | 72% | M. Ghazi | SAR 120 K | 280 | On track | |
NSNADIA Defence Sys. | ISO 27001 v2 upgrade | Cyber | Apr 01, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 | 65% | A. Al-Dosari | SAR 180 K | 420 | On track | |
APAl-Ahsa Precision | AS9100 accreditation | Quality | Jun 10, 2026 | Nov 20, 2026 | 42% | M. Ghazi | SAR 250 K | 650 | At risk | |
WDWahaj Defense Ind. | iktva 34%→60% | Localization | Feb 15, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 | 78% | R. Al-Salem | SAR 80 K | 190 | On track | |
JMJubail Marine Works | ISO 9001 renewal | Quality | Jun 01, 2026 | Sep 15, 2026 | 88% | F. Al-Otaibi | SAR 45 K | 110 | On track | |
TPTabuk Precision Ltd. | Financial audit + IFRS | Financial | Mar 20, 2026 | Oct 05, 2026 | 58% | Y. Al-Harbi | SAR 35 K | 85 | On track | |
HDHail Defense Comp. | NADCAP audit prep | Quality | Jul 08, 2026 | Nov 30, 2026 | 12% | M. Ghazi | SAR 200 K | 510 | Not started | |
MCMadinah Composites | Capacity ramp ×2 | Capacity | Jan 15, 2026 | Oct 30, 2026 | 52% | N. Farsi | SAR 480 K | 1,200 | On track | |
AKAl-Kharj Wire & Cable | OTIF turnaround 8-D | Delivery | Jul 15, 2026 | Dec 15, 2026 | 22% | O. Khalid | SAR 60 K | 150 | At risk | |
FAFaisal Aero Mfg. | Digital MES rollout | Innovation | Feb 20, 2026 | Dec 30, 2026 | 44% | N. Farsi | SAR 220 K | 560 | On track | |
RERiyadh Electronics | Quality rescue · CAPA | Quality | Aug 01, 2026 | Feb 01, 2027 | 6% | A. Al-Dosari | SAR 140 K | 340 | Not started |
Investment by Category SAR K committed
Capacity1,200
Quality1,610
Cyber420
Innovation560
Safety (HSE)280
Delivery150
Localization190
Financial85
Total committedSAR 4,595 K
Program Outcomes Rolling 12 months
Programs completed18
Success rate78% · 14 achieved goal
Score uplift (avg)+11 pt scorecard
Maturity uplift (avg)+0.4 level
Tier promotions unlocked4
iktva uplift delivered+7.2 pt avg
SAMI co-funding disbursedSAR 1.8 M
Cost per point upliftSAR 32 K / pt
ROI (contract value : dev. spend)6.2×
Maturity Progression Movement across CMMI-style bands · Q1 2026 → Q3 2026
Q1 2026 distribution
L1 Foundational12
L2 Repeatable21
L3 Defined13
L4 Managed7
L5 Optimizing2
Q3 2026 distribution (current)
L1 Foundational8
L2 Repeatable19
L3 Defined17
L4 Managed8
L5 Optimizing3
Movement Q1 → Q3
Suppliers gaining level14 (25%)
Held level38 (69%)
Lost level3 (5%)
Average maturity2.7 → 3.0 (+0.3)
L3+ suppliers22 → 28 (+6)
Target FY end35 suppliers at L3+
On track to target80%
Top Movers · Maturity Progression Suppliers gaining bands this cycle
| Supplier | Sector | Q1 2026 | Q2 2026 | Q3 2026 | Delta | Program driver | Next milestone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahara Dynamics | Land Systems | L2 (2.0) | L2 (2.4) | L3 (3.0) | ▲ 1 lvl | HSE excellence sprint | L3 audit · Sep 30 |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | C4I | L2 (2.5) | L2 (2.8) | L3 (3.1) | ▲ 1 lvl | ISO 27001 v2 upgrade | Recertify · Oct 15 |
| Wahaj Defense Ind. | Avionics | L1 (1.8) | L2 (2.4) | L2 (2.8) | ▲ 1 lvl | iktva sprint | iktva 60% · Sep 22 |
| Al-Ahsa Precision | Land Systems | L2 (2.3) | L2 (2.6) | L2 (2.9) | ▲ 0.6 | AS9100 accreditation | Stage 2 audit · Nov 20 |
| Madinah Composites | Aerostructures | L2 (2.4) | L2 (2.6) | L2 (2.7) | ▲ 0.3 | Capacity ramp ×2 | Line 2 online · Oct 30 |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Avionics | L3 (3.0) | L2 (2.8) | L2 (2.4) | ▼ 1 lvl | OTIF turnaround 8-D | OTIF recovery · Dec 15 |
Quarterly Business Reviews 9 QBRs scheduled Aug–Oct 2026 · executive review of Tier 1 & strategic Tier 2
| Supplier | QBR date | Sponsor (SAMI) | Supplier attendees | Scorecard delta | Actions open | Prior CSAT | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | Aug 12, 2026 | SAMI Munitions | CEO, COO, QA head | ▲ 4 | 2 | 4.5 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Al-Salam Aerospace | Aug 19, 2026 | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | MD, GM Ops, HSE | ▲ 2 | 3 | 4.4 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Riyadh Defense Elite | Aug 26, 2026 | SAMI Land Systems | CEO, VP Manufacturing | ▲ 1 | 1 | 4.3 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Riyadh Elite Sys. | Sep 02, 2026 | SAMI C4I | CEO, CISO, CTO | ▲ 3 | 4 | 4.2 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Peninsula Munitions | Sep 09, 2026 | SAMI Munitions | CEO, QA, Ops | ▼ 4 | 6 | 3.8 / 5 | Escalation |
| Jeddah Aero Elite | Sep 16, 2026 | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | GM, Sales | ▬ 0 | 2 | 4.1 / 5 | Confirmed |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | Sep 23, 2026 | SAMI C4I | CEO, R&D | ▲ 5 | 3 | 4.0 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Sahara Dynamics | Oct 07, 2026 | SAMI Land Systems | MD, HSE, Ops | ▲ 6 | 5 | 3.9 / 5 | Confirmed |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | Oct 14, 2026 | SAMI Avionics | CEO, Ops director | ▼ 7 | 8 | 3.5 / 5 | Escalation |
Recent QBR Highlights Actions and decisions
May 20, 2026 · Taibah Arms Mfg.
Q2 QBR – Munitions frame award confirmed
3 actions closed · iktva plan endorsed · CSAT 4.5
Jun 03, 2026 · Al-Salam Aerospace
Q2 QBR – Aero JV composite parts, capacity Line 3
2 actions closed · co-funding SAR 250 K approved
Aug 12, 2026 · in 4 d
Q3 QBR – Taibah Arms Mfg.
Scorecard ▲ 4, contract renewal decision on agenda
Sep 09, 2026 · in 32 d
Q3 QBR – Peninsula Munitions (escalation)
Scorecard ▼ 4, PPM 780, CAPA overdue
Oct 14, 2026 · in 67 d
Q3 QBR – Al-Kharj Wire & Cable (escalation)
Scorecard ▼ 7, OTIF 62%, suspension risk
Supplier Voice / CSAT 360-degree feedback
CSAT (supplier of SAMI)4.1 / 5
NPS+38
Ease of doing business4.0 / 5
Payment terms rating3.8 / 5
Portal usability4.4 / 5
Assessor professionalism4.6 / 5
Development program value4.3 / 5
Top complaintPayment cycle length
Top praisePortal + assessor quality
Responses (Q3)47 of 55 (85%)
Approved & Shortlist Suppliers view
Post-assessment supplier pool · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Last decision Aug 06, 2026
Tier 1 — Shortlist 21
Tier 2 — Develop 13
Re-assess 7
Watchlist 9
Pipeline / Conditional 5
Tier 1 approved
21
Shortlist · award-ready
Tier 2 develop
13
Conditional · dev. plan required
Re-assess pool
7
3 overdue · 4 due < 60 d
Watchlist
9
Performance / risk trigger
Pipeline SAR
380 M
Awarded YTD 142 M
Avg Loc. shortlist
68%
Vision 2030 target 60%
Tier 1 Shortlist — Approved Pool 21 suppliers · award-ready · sortable by EVO score
| # | Supplier | Sector · Module | EVO score | Maturity | Loc % | Must-pass | Tier | Approved | Re-assess due | Rating | Programs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SA Al-Salam Aerospace CR 1010115498 · Riyadh |
Aerostructures · Composites | 4.4 |
4.0 / 5 | 71% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Aug 05, 2026 | Feb 05, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Vision 2030 · Aero JV | |
| 2 | TA Taibah Arms Mfg. CR 4030173821 · Al-Kharj |
Munitions · Sheet metal | 4.2 |
3.6 / 5 | 78% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 30, 2026 | Jan 30, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Munitions program | |
| 3 | RD Riyadh Defense Elite CR 1010229384 · Riyadh |
Land Systems · CNC machining | 4.1 |
3.5 / 5 | 72% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 22, 2026 | Jan 22, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Land systems 2027 | |
| 4 | JE Jeddah Aero Elite CR 4030778866 · Jeddah |
Aerostructures · Composites | 3.9 |
3.5 / 5 | 68% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 18, 2026 | Jan 18, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Aero JV | |
| 5 | DL Dammam Land Tech CR 2050223366 · Dammam |
Land Systems · Hydraulics | 3.8 |
3.4 / 5 | 66% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 15, 2026 | Jan 15, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Land systems 2027 | |
| 6 | RY Riyadh Elite Sys. CR 1010334488 · Riyadh |
C4I & Cyber · Software | 3.8 |
3.6 / 5 | 64% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 12, 2026 | Jan 12, 2028 | ★★★★★ | C4I sovereignty | |
| 7 | FA Faisal Aero Mfg. CR 2050173201 · Dammam |
Aerostructures · Avionics Elec. | 3.7 |
3.4 / 5 | 62% | 8 / 8 | Tier 1 | Jul 08, 2026 | Jan 08, 2028 | ★★★★★ | Aero JV |
Rows per page: 7 · Showing 1–7 of 21 Tier 1 suppliers
Tier 2 — Develop 13 conditional approvals with dev. plan
| Supplier | Sector | Score | Gap | Owner | Plan due |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSahara Dynamics | Land Systems | 3.2 | HSE audit | M. Ghazi | Sep 30 |
NSNADIA Defence Sys. | C4I | 3.1 | Cyber ISO 27001 v2 | A. Al-Dosari | Oct 15 |
APAl-Ahsa Precision | Land Systems | 2.9 | AS9100 gap | M. Ghazi | Nov 20 |
WDWahaj Defense Ind. | Avionics | 2.8 | iktva refresh | R. Al-Salem | Sep 22 |
JMJubail Marine Works | Naval | 2.6 | ISO 9001 renewal | F. Al-Otaibi | Sep 15 |
TPTabuk Precision Ltd. | Aerostructures | 2.5 | Financial audit | Y. Al-Harbi | Oct 05 |
Re-assessment Schedule Rolling 90 days · 3 overdue · 4 due < 60 d
Overdue · Jul 25, 2026 · 14 d ago
Riyadh Electronics — Annual re-assessment
Tier 2 → downgrade risk · ISO 9001 expired · assign: A. Al-Dosari
Overdue · Aug 01, 2026 · 7 d ago
Peninsula Munitions — Recertification audit
Tier 1 hold · must complete before contract renewal · assign: R. Al-Salem
Due · Aug 22, 2026 · in 14 d
Wahaj Defense — Site re-visit
Tier 2 develop · iktva check · assign: M. Ghazi
Due · Sep 05, 2026 · in 28 d
Jubail Marine — Doc refresh
Tier 2 develop · ISO 9001 renewal · assign: F. Al-Otaibi
Scheduled · Sep 30, 2026 · in 53 d
Sahara Dynamics — Development plan review
Tier 2 → Tier 1 promotion candidate · owner M. Ghazi
Completed · Jul 30, 2026 · 9 d ago
Taibah Arms — Annual re-assessment
Tier 1 retained · score 4.2 (+0.1)
Watchlist Performance / risk triggers · 9 suppliers
| Supplier | Trigger | Severity | Since | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riyadh Electronics | ISO 9001 expired | Critical | Aug 04 | A. Al-Dosari |
| Al-Hijra Startup | Missing 6 mandatory docs | Critical | Jul 28 | R. Al-Salem |
| Peninsula Munitions | Recertification overdue | Warning | Aug 01 | R. Al-Salem |
| Al-Kharj Wire & Cable | OTIF below 85% | Warning | Jul 12 | O. Khalid |
| Tabuk Precision | Financial audit pending | Warning | Jul 05 | Y. Al-Harbi |
| Sahara Dynamics | HSE incident logged | Warning | Jun 28 | M. Ghazi |
Pool Summary Approved & shortlist analytics
Total post-assessment pool55 suppliers
Tier 1 shortlist · award-ready21 (38%)
Tier 2 develop · conditional13 (24%)
Re-assess · pending7 (13%)
Watchlist · triggered9 (16%)
Pipeline / Conditional5 (9%)
Avg EVO score (Tier 1)3.94 / 5
Avg localization (Tier 1)68% · target 60%
Awarded YTDSAR 142 M · 18 contracts
Pipeline value (3-yr)SAR 380 M
Promotions Tier 2 → Tier 1 (YTD)4
Downgrades / suspensions (YTD)2
Tier 2 — Develop 13 conditional approvals · development plan required to promote
| # | Supplier | Sector · Module | EVO score | Primary gap | Dev. plan status | Mentor | Plan due | Promotion window | Investment (SAR K) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SD Sahara Dynamics CR 2050334219 · Dammam | Land Systems · Hydraulics | 3.2 | HSE audit gap | Plan approved | M. Ghazi | Sep 30, 2026 | Q1 2027 | 280 | |
| 2 | NS NADIA Defence Sys. CR 1010887321 · Riyadh | C4I · Avionics Elec. | 3.1 | ISO 27001 v2 upgrade | Plan approved | A. Al-Dosari | Oct 15, 2026 | Q1 2027 | 420 | |
| 3 | AP Al-Ahsa Precision CR 2735112288 · Al Ahsa | Land Systems · CNC machining | 2.9 | AS9100 gap | In progress | M. Ghazi | Nov 20, 2026 | Q2 2027 | 650 | |
| 4 | WD Wahaj Defense Ind. CR 1010293847 · Riyadh | Avionics · Wire harness | 2.8 | iktva refresh 34% → 60% | In progress | R. Al-Salem | Sep 22, 2026 | Q1 2027 | 190 | |
| 5 | JM Jubail Marine Works CR 2055661188 · Jubail | Naval · Machining | 2.6 | ISO 9001 renewal | In progress | F. Al-Otaibi | Sep 15, 2026 | Q1 2027 | 110 | |
| 6 | TP Tabuk Precision Ltd. CR 7030845621 · Tabuk | Aerostructures · CNC machining | 2.5 | Audited financials | In progress | Y. Al-Harbi | Oct 05, 2026 | Q2 2027 | 85 | |
| 7 | HD Hail Defense Comp. CR 6030112211 · Hail | Munitions · Hydraulics | 2.9 | NADCAP audit | Not started | M. Ghazi | Nov 30, 2026 | Q2 2027 | 510 | |
| 8 | MC Madinah Composites CR 4030223399 · Madinah | Aerostructures · Composites | 2.7 | Capacity expansion | In progress | N. Farsi | Oct 30, 2026 | Q2 2027 | 1,200 |
Showing 1–8 of 13 · Total dev. investment SAR 4.6 M · Avg gap-to-promote 0.8 pt
Development Plan Status 13 plans in flight
Approved6 plans · 46%
In progress5 plans · 38%
Not started2 plans · 15%
Total investment committedSAR 4.6 M
SAMI co-fundingSAR 1.8 M · 39%
Avg time-to-promote7.2 months
Promotion pipeline Q1 20274 candidates
Promotion pipeline Q2 20276 candidates
Gap Type Distribution Where Tier 2 fall short
Quality certification (AS9100, NADCAP)4 suppliers · 31%
Localization / iktva3 suppliers · 23%
HSE / safety2 suppliers · 15%
Financial (audit / covenants)2 suppliers · 15%
Capacity / equipment1 supplier · 8%
Cyber (ISO 27001)1 supplier · 8%
Suppliers with ≥2 gaps3 suppliers
Recommended: JV with Tier 12 candidates
Re-assessment Schedule 7 suppliers due for re-assessment · 3 overdue · 4 due < 60 d
| Supplier | Current tier | Last score | Last assessed | Re-assess due | Status | Trigger | Assessor | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RE Riyadh Electronics CR 1010067231 |
Tier 2 | 2.2 / 5 | Jul 25, 2025 | Jul 25, 2026 (14 d overdue) | Overdue | Annual + ISO 9001 expired | A. Al-Dosari | Start now | |
PM Peninsula Munitions CR 4030338811 |
Tier 1 | 3.7 / 5 | Aug 01, 2025 | Aug 01, 2026 (7 d overdue) | Overdue | Annual recertification | R. Al-Salem | Start now | |
AK Al-Kharj Wire & Cable CR 4030557788 |
Tier 2 | 2.8 / 5 | Aug 05, 2025 | Aug 05, 2026 (3 d overdue) | Overdue | OTIF drop below 85% | O. Khalid | Start now | |
WD Wahaj Defense Ind. CR 1010293847 |
Tier 2 | 2.8 / 5 | Aug 22, 2025 | Aug 22, 2026 (14 d) | Due < 60 d | iktva refresh due | M. Ghazi | Schedule | |
JM Jubail Marine Works CR 2055661188 |
Tier 2 | 2.6 / 5 | Sep 05, 2025 | Sep 05, 2026 (28 d) | Due < 60 d | ISO 9001 renewal | F. Al-Otaibi | Schedule | |
SD Sahara Dynamics CR 2050334219 |
Tier 2 | 3.2 / 5 | Sep 30, 2025 | Sep 30, 2026 (53 d) | Due < 60 d | Development plan review | M. Ghazi | Schedule | |
NS NADIA Defence Sys. CR 1010887321 |
Tier 2 | 3.1 / 5 | Oct 15, 2025 | Oct 15, 2026 (68 d) | Due < 90 d | Cyber ISO 27001 v2 due | A. Al-Dosari | Schedule |
Re-assessment Cycle Load Next 12 months
Aug 2026 (this month)4 due · 3 overdue
Sep 20262 due
Oct 20261 due
Nov – Dec 20267 forecast
Q1 202714 forecast
Q2 202718 forecast
Avg re-assessment duration18 days
Cycle SLA compliance86%
Outcome History Trailing 12 months
Re-assessments completed32
Tier confirmed (no change)24 · 75%
Promoted Tier 2 → Tier 14 · 13%
Downgraded Tier 1 → Tier 22 · 6%
Suspended (dropped)2 · 6%
Avg score change+0.12 pt
Avg localization change+4.1 pt
Re-assessment cost / supplierSAR 42 K avg
Watchlist 9 suppliers flagged by performance or risk triggers
| Supplier | Tier | Trigger | Severity | Detected | Age | Impact | Owner | Next action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERiyadh Electronics | Tier 2 | ISO 9001 expired | Critical | Aug 04, 2026 | 4 d | Blocks award | A. Al-Dosari | Force re-assess | |
AHAl-Hijra Startup | Prospect | Missing 6 mandatory docs | Critical | Jul 28, 2026 | 11 d | Assessment stalled | R. Al-Salem | Send reminder | |
PMPeninsula Munitions | Tier 1 | Recertification overdue | Warning | Aug 01, 2026 | 7 d | Contract renewal risk | R. Al-Salem | Start re-assess | |
AKAl-Kharj Wire & Cable | Tier 2 | OTIF below 85% | Warning | Jul 12, 2026 | 27 d | Program A delays | O. Khalid | Performance review | |
TPTabuk Precision Ltd. | Tier 2 | Financial audit pending | Warning | Jul 05, 2026 | 34 d | Credit exposure | Y. Al-Harbi | Request docs | |
SDSahara Dynamics | Tier 2 | HSE incident logged | Warning | Jun 28, 2026 | 41 d | Root-cause review open | M. Ghazi | Site audit | |
HDHail Defense Comp. | Tier 2 | NADCAP audit not started | Warning | Jun 20, 2026 | 49 d | Promotion delayed | M. Ghazi | Kick off audit | |
MCMadinah Composites | Tier 2 | Ownership change filed | Info | Jul 30, 2026 | 9 d | KYC review needed | N. Farsi | KYC refresh | |
NPNorthern Precision | Tier 1 | Sanction screening — clear | Info | Aug 02, 2026 | 6 d | None | Compliance | Close flag |
Trigger Rules Automated watchlist entry
Any mandatory certification expiredCritical
≥3 missing mandatory documentsCritical
Re-assessment overdue > 30 daysCritical
OTIF < 85% over rolling 3 monthsWarning
HSE incident loggedWarning
Financial audit > 90 days lateWarning
Ownership / sanction changeInfo
Rules active18 · last updated Jul 12
Watchlist Analytics Trailing 90 days
Flags raised27
Flags cleared18 · 67%
Flags escalated6
Suppliers suspended2
Avg time-to-clear11.4 days
Top triggerCert expiry (9)
Top sector affectedAvionics (6)
Recurring flag suppliers3
Pipeline / Conditional Approvals 5 suppliers pending award decision · SAR 380 M pipeline value
| Supplier | Program / Contract | Category | Pipeline SAR | Probability | Weighted | Conditions | Decision by | Sponsor | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA Al-Salam Aerospace Tier 1 |
Aero JV composite parts — 3 yr frame | Aerostructures | 120 M | 85% | 102 M | iktva plan sign-off | Sep 15, 2026 | SAMI Advanced Mfg. | Conditional award | |
TA Taibah Arms Mfg. Tier 1 |
Munitions casings — 2 yr frame | Munitions | 95 M | 80% | 76 M | Capacity ramp Q4 | Oct 01, 2026 | SAMI Munitions | Conditional award | |
RY Riyadh Elite Sys. Tier 1 |
C4I sovereignty — SW dev. framework | C4I & Cyber | 78 M | 65% | 51 M | Cyber ISO 27001 v2 | Nov 15, 2026 | SAMI C4I | In negotiation | |
RD Riyadh Defense Elite Tier 1 |
Land systems 2027 — CNC frame | Land Systems | 55 M | 60% | 33 M | Capacity study | Dec 01, 2026 | SAMI Land Systems | In negotiation | |
SD Sahara Dynamics Tier 2 |
Hydraulics sub-assembly — 1 yr pilot | Land Systems | 32 M | 45% | 14 M | Dev. plan complete + HSE audit | Q1 2027 | SAMI Land Systems | Blocked · gap |
Total pipeline SAR 380 M · Weighted SAR 276 M · Avg probability 67%
Awarded YTD SAR 142 M · 18 contracts
Pipeline by Category Weighted value
AerostructuresSAR 102 M · 37%
MunitionsSAR 76 M · 28%
C4I & CyberSAR 51 M · 18%
Land SystemsSAR 47 M · 17%
Total weightedSAR 276 M
Localization committed (weighted)64% · target 60%
Vision 2030 linked4 of 5 contracts
SME participation1 of 5
Decision Timeline Next 6 months
Sep 15, 2026 · in 38 d
Al-Salam Aerospace — Aero JV award
SAR 120 M · 85% · Conditional on iktva plan sign-off
Oct 01, 2026 · in 54 d
Taibah Arms Mfg. — Munitions frame
SAR 95 M · 80% · Conditional on Q4 capacity ramp
Nov 15, 2026 · in 99 d
Riyadh Elite Sys. — C4I SW frame
SAR 78 M · 65% · Cyber ISO 27001 v2 required
Dec 01, 2026 · in 115 d
Riyadh Defense Elite — Land Systems 2027
SAR 55 M · 60% · Capacity study open
Q1 2027 · blocked
Sahara Dynamics — Hydraulics pilot
SAR 32 M · 45% · Dev. plan + HSE audit outstanding
Start from Template Assessments view
12 pre‑configured assessment templates · 3‑step launch wizard · 90‑sec dispatch · EN/AR bilingual · Refreshed Aug 11, 2026
Templates published
12
4 lifecycle · 4 role · 3 situation · 1 combo
Launched (30 d)
148
+42 vs prior 30 d
Avg dispatch time
1 m 28 s
‑ 84 % vs manual authoring
Avg completion
14 d
‑ 7 d vs bespoke
Adoption rate
92 %
92 % of cycles use a template
EN/AR coverage
98 %
2 templates pending AR review
Filter:
All templates 12
Lifecycle stage 5
Role / dimension 4
Situation 3
Duration:
Role:
✨
Recommended for you · based on your open pipeline
21 Tier 1 candidates waiting for shortlist screen · 9 approved suppliers due for annual re‑cert this month · 4 financial‑distress cases flagged
Lifecycle stage templates
5 templates · covers discovery → renewal
🎯
CORE
New Supplier Onboarding — Full 11‑Dimension
Complete discovery assessment for Tier‑2 candidates entering the pipeline for the first time.
542 Q
~21 d
11/11 dims
9 must‑pass
EN + AR
🧭 When: new supplier discovery
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Tech Assessor + Financial Analyst
📤 Auto‑output: Full assessment report + development plan draft
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Tech Assessor + Financial Analyst
📤 Auto‑output: Full assessment report + development plan draft
88 suppliers · v4.2Aug 11, 2026
MOST USED
⚡
FAST‑TRACK
Tier 1 Shortlist Screen
Rapid go/no‑go screen for shortlist candidates pre‑award. Financial & Localization excluded (assessed later).
148 Q
7‑9 d
9/11 dims
5 must‑pass
EN + AR
🧭 When: pre‑award T1 candidate screen
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Tech Assessor
📤 Auto‑output: Shortlist recommendation memo (PPTX)
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Tech Assessor
📤 Auto‑output: Shortlist recommendation memo (PPTX)
21 suppliers · v2.3Aug 04, 2026
🔁
RECURRING
Annual Re‑certification
Refresh assessment for approved‑pool suppliers. Focuses on year‑over‑year deltas and compliance renewals.
102 Q
5‑6 d
10/11 dims
4 must‑pass
EN + AR
🧭 When: approved pool refresh (yearly)
👥 Reviewers: Tech Assessor + auto‑prefill from last cycle
📤 Auto‑output: Renewal recommendation memo
👥 Reviewers: Tech Assessor + auto‑prefill from last cycle
📤 Auto‑output: Renewal recommendation memo
34 suppliers · v3.1Jul 22, 2026
🩺
FAST‑TRACK
Post‑Award 90‑Day Health Check
Execution readiness check 90 days after award. Focuses on delivery, quality, and localization progress.
62 Q
~3 d
6/11 dims
3 must‑pass
EN + AR
🧭 When: D+90 after contract award
👥 Reviewers: Program Manager + Tech Assessor
📤 Auto‑output: Health check card + risk flags
👥 Reviewers: Program Manager + Tech Assessor
📤 Auto‑output: Health check card + risk flags
18 suppliers · v1.4Aug 01, 2026
🚨
AT‑RISK
Watchlist Recovery Assessment
Recovery diagnostic for watchlisted suppliers. Deep‑dive on root cause and remediation appetite.
88 Q
~5 d
8/11 dims
6 must‑pass
EN + AR
🧭 When: supplier flagged watchlist
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Risk Officer
📤 Auto‑output: CAPA plan + downgrade recommendation
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Risk Officer
📤 Auto‑output: CAPA plan + downgrade recommendation
9 suppliers · v1.2Jul 28, 2026
Role / dimension deep‑dive templates
4 templates · permission‑gated to specific roles
💰
ROLE‑GATEDFinancial Health Deep‑Dive
Financial‑only assessment for distress cases or capital‑intensive contracts. 🔒 Financial Analyst only.
62 Q
~4 d
1 dim
3 must‑pass
🧭 When: financial distress or SAR > 50 M award
👥 Reviewer: Financial Analyst only
📤 Auto‑output: Credit memo + reserve calc
👥 Reviewer: Financial Analyst only
📤 Auto‑output: Credit memo + reserve calc
4 suppliers · v2.0Aug 05, 2026
🛡️
ROLE‑GATEDCyber & Governance Audit
Cyber posture, sanctions, ABAC and ITAR. Required before any classified programme.
74 Q
~5 d
2 dims
6 must‑pass
🧭 When: classified programme onboarding
👥 Reviewers: Cyber Reviewer + Team Lead
📤 Auto‑output: Cyber attestation + risk register
👥 Reviewers: Cyber Reviewer + Team Lead
📤 Auto‑output: Cyber attestation + risk register
17 suppliers · v1.6Aug 09, 2026
⚠️
ROLE‑GATEDHSE & Security Readiness
Safety, environment, and defence facility clearance. Includes physical & personnel security.
58 Q
~4 d
1 dim
4 must‑pass
🧭 When: before site work or defence programme
👥 Reviewer: HSE Reviewer
📤 Auto‑output: HSE readiness certificate
👥 Reviewer: HSE Reviewer
📤 Auto‑output: HSE readiness certificate
12 suppliers · v1.3Aug 03, 2026
🇸🇦
ROLE‑GATEDLocalization / iktva Deep‑Dive
Vision 2030 alignment, Saudi content trajectory and iktva simulator inputs. Bilingual EN/AR mandatory.
76 Q
~5 d
2 dims
3 must‑pass
🧭 When: V2030 pillar review or iktva filing
👥 Reviewer: Vision 2030 office + Team Lead
📤 Auto‑output: iktva simulator run + gap plan
👥 Reviewer: Vision 2030 office + Team Lead
📤 Auto‑output: iktva simulator run + gap plan
22 suppliers · v2.1Aug 06, 2026
Situation templates
3 templates · for specific events or delivery modes
📱
MOBILEOn‑site Verification Kit
Mobile‑ready checklist for physical site visits. Geo‑tagged evidence, photo capture, offline mode.
88 items
1 day on‑site
Mfg + Quality + HSE
GPS · offline
🧭 When: physical verification visit
👥 Reviewer: Technical Assessor on‑site
📤 Auto‑output: Photo log + geo‑tag map + discrepancy list
👥 Reviewer: Technical Assessor on‑site
📤 Auto‑output: Photo log + geo‑tag map + discrepancy list
36 visits · v3.2Aug 10, 2026
🏛️
24‑HR TURNBoard Escalation Fast Pack
24‑hour turnaround diagnostic for board‑level escalations. Auto‑generates a 6‑page board memo.
24 Q
24 h SLA
11/11 dims (snapshot)
RUSH
🧭 When: board escalation, critical alert
👥 Reviewer: Team Lead + System Admin
📤 Auto‑output: 6‑page board memo (PPTX + PDF)
👥 Reviewer: Team Lead + System Admin
📤 Auto‑output: 6‑page board memo (PPTX + PDF)
8 suppliers · v1.0Aug 07, 2026
🤝
COMBOJV / Co‑investment Readiness
Strategic + Financial + Governance combo. Runs before signing an MoU or JV structuring workshop.
96 Q
10‑12 d
3 dims (SA + FH + GC)
7 must‑pass
🧭 When: JV signing, capital investment
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Financial Analyst + Board Sponsor
📤 Auto‑output: JV readiness memo + term sheet input
👥 Reviewers: Team Lead + Financial Analyst + Board Sponsor
📤 Auto‑output: JV readiness memo + term sheet input
3 suppliers · v1.1Jul 30, 2026
📈 Template adoption analytics
Trailing 90 days · refreshed Aug 11, 2026
Adoption ranking by template
| Template | Launched | Avg completion | Drop‑off | CSAT | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Tier 1 Shortlist Screen | 42 | 7.6 d | 4 % | 4.4 / 5 | ▲ +18 % |
| 🎯 Full Onboarding 11‑Dim | 28 | 20.4 d | 6 % | 4.2 / 5 | ▲ +12 % |
| 🔁 Annual Re‑certification | 22 | 5.2 d | 3 % | 4.5 / 5 | ▲ +9 % |
| 📱 On‑site Verification Kit | 18 | 1.1 d | 2 % | 4.6 / 5 | ▲ +24 % |
| 🩺 Post‑Award 90‑Day Check | 12 | 2.8 d | 5 % | 4.1 / 5 | ▲ +6 % |
| 🛡️ Cyber & Governance Audit | 9 | 4.8 d | 8 % | 4.0 / 5 | ▲ +14 % |
| 🇸🇦 Localization Deep‑Dive | 7 | 5.4 d | 6 % | 4.3 / 5 | ▲ +11 % |
| 🚨 Watchlist Recovery | 4 | 4.9 d | 12 % | 3.8 / 5 | → flat |
| ⚠️ HSE & Security Readiness | 3 | 3.6 d | 7 % | 4.4 / 5 | ▲ +5 % |
| 🏛️ Board Escalation Fast Pack | 2 | 18 h | 0 % | 4.7 / 5 | ▲ new |
| 💰 Financial Health Deep‑Dive | 1 | 4.1 d | 0 % | 4.5 / 5 | → flat |
| 🤝 JV / Co‑investment Readiness | 0 | — | — | — | ☀ pending |
Launches by category
Lifecycle stage102 (69 %)
Role / dimension20 (14 %)
Situation20 (13 %)
Combo (JV etc.)6 (4 %)
Time saved vs manual
1,247 h
across 148 launches · avg 8.4 h saved per assessment vs authoring from scratch
Drop‑off hotspots
• Watchlist Recovery: 12 % drop‑off at CAPA appetite question
• Cyber Audit: 8 % drop‑off at ISO 27001 evidence upload
• Post‑Award 90‑Day: 5 % at localization progress narrative
Top launchers (30 d)
A. Al‑Shehri (Team Lead)42
N. Al‑Fahad (Tech Assr.)28
M. George (Sys Admin)21
F. Al‑Dosari (Cyber Rev.)9
🎯 Template preview · read‑only · v4.2
New Supplier Onboarding — Full 11‑Dimension
542 questions · ~21 d avg · 11/11 dimensions · 9 must‑pass · EN + AR · Owner: A. Al‑Shehri (Team Lead)
Dimension breakdown (11)
| Dimension | Weight | Q | Must‑pass | Sample question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🎯 Strategic Alignment | 10 % | 52 | 3 | Signed localization MoU? |
| 🔬 Technical Capability | 15 % | 78 | 2 | TRL of top‑5 products (≥ 6) |
| 🏭 Manufacturing | 15 % | 81 | 4 | OEE last 12 months (≥ 65 %) |
| ✅ Quality Management | 10 % | 64 | 3 | AS9100 certification + audit |
| ⚙️ Operational Capacity | 10 % | 48 | 2 | MES / ERP live? |
| 💰 Financial Health 🔒 | 10 % | 38 | 3 | DSCR > 1.2, audited FS |
| 🔗 Supply Chain | 5 % | 34 | 1 | ITAR / EAR posture |
| 👥 Workforce & Org | 5 % | 32 | 1 | Saudization % / Nitaqat band |
| 📜 Governance & Compliance | 5 % | 36 | 4 | Sanctions / BO screening |
| ⚠️ HSE & Security | 5 % | 34 | 2 | Facility clearance for defence |
| 🇸🇦 Localization | 10 % | 45 | 2 | Saudi content trajectory to 2030 |
| Total | 100 % | 542 | 27 | — |
Workflow & auto‑outputs
Stage 1 (D 0‑2): Directory invite → supplier receives portal login + welcome pack (EN/AR).
Stage 2 (D 2‑10): Supplier fills questionnaire in portal, uploads evidence (avg 42 documents).
Stage 3 (D 10‑14): Technical & Financial assessors score answers; Team Lead calibrates.
Stage 4 (D 14‑18): Optional on‑site verification visit (mobile kit).
Stage 5 (D 18‑21): Auto‑generate Full assessment report (PPTX), Development plan draft (Word), iktva simulator run (Excel), Board memo (PDF).
Reviewers & permissions
Assessment Team LeadFull
Technical Assessor10 dims
Financial AnalystFin only 🔒
SAMI ReviewerRead‑only
Evidence checklist (top 8 of 42)
◻ Commercial Registration (CR)
◻ VAT / ZATCA certificate
◻ Audited financial statements (3 y)
◻ AS9100 / ISO 9001 certificate
◻ Nitaqat compliance letter
◻ iktva filing (last cycle)
◻ Localization MoU / roadmap
◻ Sanctions / BO screening report
Governance
Owner: A. Al‑Shehri
Version: v4.2 (published Jul 28, 2026)
Next review: Oct 15, 2026
Adoption: 88 suppliers · 4.2 / 5 CSAT
Sample questions (10 of 542)
| ID | Question (EN) | Dimension | Type | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q‑SA‑05 | Signed localization MoU with a Saudi entity? | Strategic | Multi + upload | 3.0 |
| Q‑TC‑01 | Describe R&D capability and IP portfolio | Technical | Long text + upload | 3.0 |
| Q‑MC‑08 | CNC machining capacity (spindle hours / month) | Manufacturing | Numeric | 2.5 |
| Q‑QM‑03 | AS9100 certification status and last audit finding | Quality | Multi + upload | 3.5 |
| Q‑OC‑04 | OEE, cycle‑time and OTIF for last 12 months | Operational | Numeric | 2.5 |
| Q‑FH‑05 | 3‑yr revenue, EBITDA and debt / equity ratio | Financial | Numeric + upload | 3.0 |
| Q‑SC‑09 | Sub‑tier visibility depth and dual‑source coverage | Supply Chain | Likert + long text | 2.0 |
| Q‑WF‑06 | Saudization %, Nitaqat band, training hours / FTE | Workforce | Numeric | 2.5 |
| Q‑GC‑04 | Sanctions / BO screening and ZATCA compliance | Governance | Multi + upload | 3.0 |
| Q‑LC‑02 | Saudi content % and roadmap to Vision 2030 target | Localization | Numeric + long text | 4.0 |
Showing 10 of 542 questions · preview is read‑only · clone to edit
Launch wizard · template v4.2
New Supplier Onboarding — Full 11‑Dimension
1
Confirm scope
Cycle name & dates
2
Pick suppliers
Directory or CSV
3
Assign & dispatch
Reviewers & email
ℹ️ Auto‑suggested: a 21‑day window starting Aug 15 matches the template’s typical duration. Adjust freely; the platform will re‑compute reminder cadence.
Advanced options
| Supplier | Sector | Stage | Region | Last assessed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riyadh Aerodynamics | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Riyadh | Never | |
| Al‑Kharj Composites | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Al‑Kharj | Never | |
| Jeddah Precision Works | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Jeddah | Never | |
| Peninsula Aero Systems | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Dhahran | Never | |
| Tabuk Metal Forming | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Tabuk | Never | |
| NADIA Aerospace Ltd. | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Riyadh | Never | |
| Wahaj Advanced Structures | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Yanbu | Never | |
| Taibah Technologies | Aerostructures | Tier 2 candidate | Madinah | Never |
6 suppliers selected · estimated 6 × 42 evidence uploads · estimated 6 × 21 d completion
Reviewer assignment (auto‑mapped)
| Role | Person | Scope | Est. hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team Lead | A. Al‑Shehri | All dimensions | 18 h |
| Technical Assessor | N. Al‑Fahad | 10 dims (excl. Financial) | 42 h |
| Financial Analyst | F. Al‑Dosari | Financial only 🔒 | 12 h |
| Cyber Reviewer | M. George | Governance (Cyber sub) | 6 h |
| SAMI Reviewer | Board Sponsor | Read‑only | 2 h |
Supplier email preview (EN)
Subject: SAMI EVO onboarding assessment — action required by Sep 05, 2026
Dear [Supplier],
You have been enrolled in the FY26 Wave 4 Aerostructures onboarding cycle. Please log in to the SAMI EVO portal, complete the 542‑question assessment across 11 dimensions and upload the required evidence (est. 42 documents) by Sep 05, 2026. Your dedicated assessor N. Al‑Fahad will be in touch within 48 hours.
Portal link: portal.sami.evo/W4-AERO-2026 · Support: evo@sami.sa
✅
Cycle dispatched
FY26 Wave 4 — Aerostructures onboarding launched to 6 suppliers. Assessors notified. Cycle now visible in Active Assessments Kanban and Cycles & Waves Administrator.
Step 1 of 3 · avg dispatch time 1 m 28 s
Assessment Engine Assessments view
500+ question bank · 11 dimensions · 15 technology modules · EN/AR bilingual · Version v4.2 (published Jul 28, 2026) · Author: Assessment Team Lead
Question bank
542
+38 vs v4.1 · 12 retired
Templates
18
11 dimensions · 15 tech modules
Bilingual coverage
98 %
EN 100 % · AR 98 % · 12 items pending
Conditional rules
124
skip / branch / auto‑score
Live cycles
6
3 waves in flight · 142 suppliers
Avg completion
21 d
‑ 4 d vs target 25 d
Question Bank 542
Templates 18
Conditional Logic 124
Versions 12
Bilingual QA 12
12 Dimensions All
Strategic Alignment52 Q · 10%
Technical Capability68 Q · 13%
Manufacturing Capability85 Q · 13%
Quality Management64 Q · 8%
Operational Capacity44 Q · 7%
Financial Health & Stability70 Q · 10%
Supply Chain Resilience34 Q · 5%
Workforce & Organisation32 Q · 5%
Governance, Compliance & Cyber70 Q · 9%
HSE & Physical Security30 Q · 4%
Localization45 Q · 8%
Innovation & R&D52 Q · 8%
Question Types
Likert 1‑5218
Multi‑select128
Numeric + unit96
Document upload72
Long text28
| ID | Question (EN) | Dimension | Type | Weight | AR | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q‑TC‑01 | Describe R&D capability and IP portfolio | Technical | Long text + upload | 3.0 | ✓ | R&D dossier | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑MC‑08 | CNC machining capacity (spindle hours / month) | Manufacturing | Numeric | 2.5 | ✓ | Utilisation report | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑QM‑03 | AS9100 certification status and last audit finding | Quality | Multi + upload | 3.5 | ✓ | Cert + audit | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑FH‑05 | 3‑yr revenue, EBITDA and debt/equity ratio | Financial | Numeric + upload | 3.0 | ✓ | Audited FS | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑LC‑02 | Current Saudi content % and roadmap to Vision 2030 target | Localization | Numeric + long text | 4.0 | ✓ | iktva filing | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑GC‑04 | Sanctions / BO screening and ZATCA compliance | Governance | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ | Screen log | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑HSE‑07 | LTIFR, TRIR, near‑miss reporting maturity | HSE | Numeric + Likert | 2.5 | ✓ | HSE MIS | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑SC‑09 | Sub‑tier visibility depth and dual‑source coverage | Supply Chain | Likert + long text | 2.0 | ✓ | Map + BOM | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑WF‑06 | Saudization %, Nitaqat band, training hours / FTE | Workforce | Numeric | 2.5 | ✓ | HR MIS | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑OC‑04 | OEE, cycle‑time and OTIF for last 12 months | Operational | Numeric + Likert | 2.5 | ✓ | MES export | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑SA‑02 | Alignment to SAMI 2030 Vision pillars (self‑assess) | Strategic | Likert | 2.0 | ✓ | Strategy deck | PUBLISHED |
| Q‑TC‑18 | Additive manufacturing / composite lay‑up capacity | Technical | Multi + upload | 2.0 | ⚠ | Machine list | DRAFT v4.3 |
| Q‑LC‑12 | Localization simulator inputs (labor, sourcing, R&D) | Localization | Numeric | 1.5 | ⚠ | Model output | DRAFT v4.3 |
| Q‑GC‑11 | Cyber posture: ISO 27001, MFA, incident response | Governance | Likert + upload | 2.0 | ✕ | Cert + IR plan | NEEDS AR |
| Q‑FH‑12 | Escrow, bank guarantee, insurance for defence contracts | Financial | Multi + upload | 2.0 | ⚠ | Certificates | DRAFT v4.3 |
Showing 15 of 542 questions · filtered by all dimensions
Rows per page 15 ▾ · Page 1 / 37
Dimension 1 of 12
🎯 Strategic Alignment
Fit with SAMI’s Vision 2030 pillars, defence localization mandate, and long‑term partnership intent. Owner: Assessment Team Lead · Reviewer: Board Sponsor.
Weight
10 %
52 questions · 4 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.6 / 5
Best supplier Al‑Salam 4.6
Weakest Peninsula 2.1
Must‑pass items 3
Evidence types 6
4 Sub‑groups
| Vision 2030 pillar alignment | 18 Q · 3.5 % |
| Defence localization commitment | 14 Q · 3.0 % |
| Long‑term partnership & JV appetite | 12 Q · 2.0 % |
| Executive sponsorship & governance | 8 Q · 1.5 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Strategic partner: Co‑invested, board‑level joint plan.
4 – Aligned: Signed MoU, roadmap to 2030.
3 – Engaged: Recognises pillars, no MoU.
2 – Aware: Verbal buy‑in only.
1 – Transactional: No stated alignment.
52 questions in Strategic Alignment3 must‑pass · 4 draft v4.3
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub‑group | Type | Weight | Must‑pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q‑SA‑01 | Which Vision 2030 pillars does the supplier explicitly target? | V2030 alignment | Multi | 2.0 | — | Strategy deck |
| Q‑SA‑02 | Alignment to SAMI 2030 Vision pillars (self‑assess) | V2030 alignment | Likert | 2.0 | — | Strategy deck |
| Q‑SA‑05 | Signed localization MoU with a Saudi entity? | Defence commitment | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | MoU PDF |
| Q‑SA‑08 | 10‑yr localization commitment schedule (labour, R&D, capex) | Defence commitment | Numeric + upload | 3.5 | — | Roadmap |
| Q‑SA‑12 | JV or co‑investment appetite & expected ticket size | JV appetite | Multi + long text | 2.5 | — | Board resolution |
| Q‑SA‑17 | Named C‑level executive sponsor for SAMI relationship | Sponsorship | Text | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | Org chart |
| Q‑SA‑23 | Governance frequency (steering committee cadence) | Sponsorship | Multi | 1.5 | — | Charter |
| Q‑SA‑34 | Alignment to General Authority of Military Industries (GAMI) strategy | Defence commitment | Likert + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | GAMI letter |
| Q‑SA‑41 | Prior track record with SAMI or KSA MoD entities | V2030 alignment | Multi | 2.0 | — | Case log |
| Q‑SA‑48 | Willingness to relocate manufacturing to KSA within 3 years | JV appetite | Likert | 2.5 | — | Plan |
Showing 10 of 52 questions in Strategic AlignmentPage 1 / 6
Must‑pass rules (3)
• Q‑SA‑05 Signed localization MoU – fail blocks Tier 1 award.
• Q‑SA‑17 Named C‑level sponsor – fail blocks strategic supplier status.
• Q‑SA‑34 GAMI alignment letter – fail flags Board escalation.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Strategic partner10 (7 %)
4 – Aligned36 (25 %)
3 – Engaged58 (41 %)
2 – Aware28 (20 %)
1 – Transactional10 (7 %)
Dimension 2 of 12
🔬 Technical Capability
R&D, IP portfolio, engineering headcount, TRL of key products, additive & composite capability.
Weight
15 %
78 questions · 5 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.4
Best Taibah Tech 4.7
Weakest NADIA 2.4
Must‑pass 2
Evidence types 9
Sub‑groups & question counts
| R&D capability & IP portfolio | 22 Q · 4.5 % |
| Engineering headcount & PhD ratio | 12 Q · 3.0 % |
| TRL of key products | 16 Q · 3.5 % |
| Additive & composite capability | 14 Q · 2.5 % |
| Design software & simulation tooling | 14 Q · 1.5 % |
Sample questions
• Q‑TC‑01 R&D capability & IP portfolio (weight 3.0, evidence R&D dossier)
• Q‑TC‑18 Additive manufacturing / composite lay‑up capacity (weight 2.0)
• Q‑TC‑24 TRL of top‑5 products (must‑pass ≥ TRL 6)
• Q‑TC‑33 Number of design engineers per SAR 100 M revenue
• Q‑TC‑42 Simulation stack (CATIA, ANSYS, Abaqus, Simcenter)
Dimension 3 of 12
🏭 Manufacturing Capability
Plant capacity, machine list, cycle time, OEE, tool & die capability, contamination control.
Weight
15 %
81 questions · 6 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.7
Best Al‑Salam 4.5
Weakest Peninsula 1.9
Must‑pass 4
Evidence types 11
Sub‑groups
Plant capacity & footprint · Machine tools & cycle time · OEE & uptime · Tool & die · Cleanroom / contamination · Special processes (NDT, heat treat)
Sample questions
• Q‑MC‑08 CNC machining capacity (spindle hours / month) – 3.0 weight
• Q‑MC‑15 Composite auto‑clave hours available
• Q‑MC‑24 OEE last 12 months (must‑pass ≥ 65 %)
• Q‑MC‑32 Special process approvals (NADCAP scope)
Dimension 4 of 12
✅ Quality Management
AS9100 / ISO 9001, first‑time‑right, PPAP maturity, CAPA closure, calibration control.
Weight
10 %
64 questions · 5 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.8
Best Al‑Salam 4.7
Weakest Riyadh Elec. 2.2
Must‑pass 3
Sample questions
• Q‑QM‑03 AS9100 certification status & last audit finding (must‑pass)
• Q‑QM‑09 First‑time‑right % (must‑pass ≥ 90 %)
• Q‑QM‑21 CAPA average closure (≤ 21 d target)
• Q‑QM‑36 Calibration & traceability chain
Dimension 5 of 12
⚙️ Operational Capacity
Cycle time, OTIF, MES/ERP maturity, scalability & surge capacity for defence programs.
Weight
10 %
48 Q · 4 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.3
Best Taibah 4.4
Weakest Tabuk 2.0
Must‑pass 2
Sample questions
• Q‑OC‑04 OEE, cycle‑time and OTIF last 12 months
• Q‑OC‑12 Surge capacity (150 % baseline) demonstration
• Q‑OC‑22 MES / ERP tools deployed (must‑pass ERP live)
Dimension 6 of 12 · v4.4 · Restricted 🔒 · MERGED
Financial Health & Stability
Merged in v4.4 (Financial Health + Financial Stability). Combined view of profitability AND survival capacity: revenue & EBITDA, balance-sheet strength, liquidity, solvency (DSCR), cash runway, banking relationships, credit ratings, and stress-test resilience. Owner: F. Al-Dosari (Financial Analyst) · Reviewer: CFO office · Board sponsor: Treasurer.
Weight
10 %
70 questions · 6 sub-groups
Portfolio avg
3.3 / 5
Best
Al-Salam 4.7
Weakest
Tabuk 1.8
Must-pass items
7
Distressed
4 suppliers
Questions
70 · 10%
6 Sub-groups
| Revenue · EBITDA · profitability | 12 Q · 2.0 % |
| Balance sheet strength (assets · debt) | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| Liquidity (current ratio · cash-to-debt) | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| Solvency (DSCR · interest coverage) | 10 Q · 2.0 % |
| Cash runway & working-capital cycle | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| Ratings · covenants · stress-test resilience | 18 Q · 1.5 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Fortress: Investment-grade · 24 mo runway · zero covenant risk.
4 – Resilient: DSCR > 2× · 18 mo runway · diversified banks.
3 – Stable: DSCR ≥ 1.5× · 12 mo runway.
2 – Stretched: DSCR 1.0-1.2× · 6 mo runway.
1 – Distressed: DSCR < 1.0× · < 3 mo runway · going-concern flag.
70 questions in Financial Health & Stability7 must-pass · v4.4 published · 🔒 Analyst-only
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub-group | Type | Weight | Must-pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-FH-05 | 3-yr revenue · EBITDA · debt/equity | Profitability | Numeric + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | Audited FS |
| Q-FH-08 | Working capital & escrow arrangements | Balance sheet | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Bank letter |
| Q-FH-12 | Escrow · bank guarantee · insurance for defence contracts | Balance sheet | Multi + upload | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | Certificates |
| Q-FS-01 | Current ratio (current assets ÷ current liabilities) — last 3 quarters | Liquidity | Numeric × 3 | 2.5 | ✓ Yes | Balance sheet |
| Q-FS-04 | Quick ratio ((current assets − inventory) ÷ current liabilities) | Liquidity | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Balance sheet |
| Q-FS-08 | Cash-to-debt ratio at reporting date | Liquidity | Numeric | 1.5 | — | Bank confirmations |
| Q-FS-11 | Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) — trailing 12 months | Solvency | Numeric | 3.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 1.2 | Audited FS |
| Q-FS-16 | Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA ÷ interest expense) | Solvency | Numeric | 2.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 2.0 | Audited FS |
| Q-FS-19 | Cash runway at current burn rate (months) | Cash runway | Numeric | 2.5 | ✓ Yes ≥ 6 mo | Cash-flow forecast |
| Q-FS-31 | Undrawn committed credit facility (SAR) | Banking | Numeric + upload | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | Facility letter |
| Q-FS-34 | External credit rating (S&P / Moody's / Fitch / SIMAH) | Ratings | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Rating letter |
| Q-FS-38 | Any covenant breach or waiver in last 24 months? | Ratings | Multi + narrative | 2.5 | ✓ No breach | Waiver letter |
| Q-FS-42 | Stress test: DSCR under revenue -30 % scenario | Stress test | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Model output |
| Q-FS-45 | Stress test: cash runway under 90-day customer payment delay | Stress test | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Model output |
Showing 14 of 70 questions in Financial Health & StabilityPage 1 of 5
Must-pass rules (7)
• Q-FH-05 Positive EBITDA 2 of last 3 y — fail flags Watch tier.
• Q-FH-12 Bank guarantees on file — fail blocks defence scope.
• Q-FS-01 Current ratio ≥ 1.0 all 3 quarters — fail flags CAPA.
• Q-FS-11 DSCR ≥ 1.2× — fail caps composite at 2.9 (rule A4).
• Q-FS-16 Interest coverage ≥ 2.0× — fail flags Treasury review.
• Q-FS-19 Cash runway ≥ 6 months — fail triggers 90-day recovery plan.
• Q-FS-38 No covenant breach in 24 m — fail = automatic Watchlist.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Fortress12 (8 %)
4 – Resilient38 (27 %)
3 – Stable58 (41 %)
2 – Stretched30 (21 %)
1 – Distressed4 (3 %)
Portfolio stress-test snapshot · Aug 12, 2026
| Scenario | Still ≥ Stable | Slip to Stretched | Slip to Distressed | SAR exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (today) | 108 (76 %) | 30 (21 %) | 4 (3 %) | SAR 84 M at risk |
| Revenue -20 % | 86 (61 %) | 44 (31 %) | 12 (8 %) | SAR 214 M at risk |
| Revenue -30 % + 90-day payment delay | 62 (44 %) | 54 (38 %) | 26 (18 %) | SAR 512 M at risk |
| SAIBOR +200 bps · rate shock | 94 (66 %) | 36 (25 %) | 12 (8 %) | SAR 168 M at risk |
Cross-cutting linkages · this dimension feeds…
Risk Alerts
Rule A4 (DSCR) · 4 fires (30 d)
Rule A4 (DSCR) · 4 fires (30 d)
Board pack
Slide 9 · treasurer exposure view
Slide 9 · treasurer exposure view
Cost Savings
Recovery-plan cost tracker
Recovery-plan cost tracker
Export Studio
T-13 Financial risk register · T-15 escrow
T-13 Financial risk register · T-15 escrow
Dimension 7 of 12
🔗 Supply Chain Resilience
Sub‑tier visibility, dual‑sourcing, lead‑time, geopolitics exposure, ITAR / EAR posture.
Weight
5 %
34 Q · 4 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 3.0
Single‑source 5
Must‑pass 1
Sample questions
• Q‑SC‑09 Sub‑tier visibility depth & dual‑source coverage
• Q‑SC‑15 ITAR / EAR posture & end‑use certifications
• Q‑SC‑22 Critical‑path lead‑time (weeks) & buffer stock policy
Dimension 8 of 12
👥 Workforce & Organisation
Saudization %, Nitaqat band, training hours, org depth, succession, unionisation.
Weight
5 %
32 Q · 3 sub‑groups
Avg Saudization 46 %
Platinum band 18
Must‑pass 1
Sample questions
• Q‑WF‑06 Saudization %, Nitaqat band, training hours / FTE
• Q‑WF‑14 Succession & key‑person risk
• Q‑WF‑21 Female participation & Vision 2030 alignment
Dimension 9 of 12 · v4.4 · MERGED
Governance, Compliance & Cybersecurity
Merged in v4.4 (Governance & Compliance + Compliance & Cybersecurity). Regulatory posture, sanctions/UBO screening, cyber maturity (ISO 27001, NIST CSF, MFA), incident response, data protection (PDPL), and ITAR/EAR/facility clearance controls. Owner: M. George (Cyber Reviewer) · Reviewer: Governance Officer · Board sponsor: CISO.
Weight
9 %
70 questions · 6 sub-groups
Portfolio avg
3.1 / 5
Best
Taibah 4.6
Weakest
Peninsula 2.1
Must-pass items
10
ISO 27001 mature
62 %
Questions
70 · 9%
6 Sub-groups
| Regulatory compliance (ZATCA · GACA · SASO · MODA) | 12 Q · 1.5 % |
| Sanctions · UBO · PEP screening | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| Cyber posture (ISO 27001 · NIST CSF · MFA) | 14 Q · 2.0 % |
| Incident response & SOC readiness | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| Data protection & privacy (Saudi PDPL) | 8 Q · 1.0 % |
| ITAR / EAR export controls · facility clearance | 16 Q · 1.5 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Optimised: Certified · SOC 24×7 · zero-trust · continuous audit.
4 – Managed: ISO 27001 · SIEM · MFA · quarterly audit.
3 – Defined: Policies documented · quarterly pen-test.
2 – Reactive: Basic controls · manual incident handling.
1 – Ad-hoc: No policies · high sanctions/breach risk.
70 questions in Governance, Compliance & Cybersecurity10 must-pass · v4.4 published
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub-group | Type | Weight | Must-pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-GC-04 | Sanctions / BO screening + ZATCA compliance | Sanctions | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | Screening log |
| Q-GCC-01 | ISO 27001 certification current & in scope for defence | Cyber posture | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | ISO cert |
| Q-GCC-04 | NIST CSF self-assessment × 5 (Identify/Protect/Detect/Respond/Recover) | Cyber posture | Numeric × 5 | 2.5 | — | Self-assessment |
| Q-GCC-07 | Multi-factor authentication enforced on MES / ERP / VPN | Cyber posture | Multi | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | IdP screenshot |
| Q-GCC-11 | Mean time to detect (MTTD) & respond (MTTR) — trailing 12 m | Incident response | Numeric + narrative | 2.0 | — | SOC report |
| Q-GCC-14 | Documented incident response plan tested in last 12 months | Incident response | Multi + upload | 1.5 | ✓ Yes | Tabletop record |
| Q-GCC-19 | ZATCA VAT + e-invoicing compliance current | Regulatory | Multi + upload | 1.5 | ✓ Yes | ZATCA cert |
| Q-GCC-22 | GAMI / MODA registration + defence-scope licence | Regulatory | Multi + upload | 2.5 | ✓ Yes | Registration letter |
| Q-GCC-28 | Anti-bribery & anti-corruption (ABAC) programme & annual training | Regulatory | Likert + upload | 1.5 | — | Policy + logs |
| Q-GCC-33 | World-Check / OFAC / EU / UN sanctions screening — supplier + UBOs | Sanctions | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | Screening report |
| Q-GCC-36 | Ultimate Beneficial Owner disclosure (≥ 10 %) with PEP flags | Sanctions | Long text + upload | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | UBO chart |
| Q-GCC-41 | Saudi PDPL data-classification schema + DPO appointed | Data protection | Multi | 1.5 | — | DPO letter |
| Q-GCC-46 | Data hosting jurisdiction · in-country residency for classified data | Data protection | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Hosting attestation |
| Q-GCC-51 | ITAR / EAR export-control classification of key products | Export controls | Multi + upload | 2.5 | — | ECCN letter |
| Q-GCC-55 | Facility Security Clearance level (MODA / GAMI) | Export controls | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | FSC letter |
Showing 15 of 70 questions in Governance, Compliance & CybersecurityPage 1 of 5
Must-pass rules (10)
• Q-GC-04 Sanctions + ZATCA compliance — fail = automatic disqualification.
• Q-GCC-01 ISO 27001 valid — fail caps composite at 2.9.
• Q-GCC-07 MFA on MES / ERP / VPN — fail blocks Tier 1 award.
• Q-GCC-14 IR plan tested < 12 m — fail flags CAPA.
• Q-GCC-19 ZATCA current — fail flags governance escalation.
• Q-GCC-22 GAMI / MODA licence — fail blocks defence scope.
• Q-GCC-33 Sanctions clear — fail = automatic disqualification.
• Q-GCC-36 UBO disclosure on file — fail flags governance review.
• Q-GCC-51 ITAR / EAR classification present — fail flags export review.
• Q-GCC-55 Facility Security Clearance current — fail blocks classified programmes.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Optimised8 (6 %)
4 – Managed32 (23 %)
3 – Defined52 (37 %)
2 – Reactive36 (25 %)
1 – Ad-hoc14 (10 %)
Cybersecurity snapshot · Aug 12, 2026
| Control | Portfolio coverage | Target | Gap | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 certified in scope | 62 % | 85 % | -23 pt | ⚠ Below target |
| MFA on critical systems | 94 % | 95 % | -1 pt | ⚠ Near-miss |
| SOC / SIEM active | 48 % | 70 % | -22 pt | ✕ Gap |
| IR tabletop < 12 m | 55 % | 80 % | -25 pt | ✕ Gap |
| Facility clearance current | 78 % | 100 % | -22 pt | ⚠ 31 pending renewal |
| Sanctions match hits (30 d) | 1 | 0 | +1 | ✕ Under review |
Cross-cutting linkages · this dimension feeds…
Risk Alerts
Rules A1 · A4 · A7 · A8 · 5 fires (7 d)
Rules A1 · A4 · A7 · A8 · 5 fires (7 d)
RFI queue
RFI-198 · ISO 27001 clause gap
RFI-198 · ISO 27001 clause gap
Board pack
Slide 9 · cyber posture row
Slide 9 · cyber posture row
Export Studio
T-16 Cyber posture heat · T-17 audit pack
T-16 Cyber posture heat · T-17 audit pack
Dimension 10 of 12
⚠️ HSE & Security
LTIFR, TRIR, near‑miss reporting maturity, physical security, defence facility clearance.
Weight
5 %
34 Q · 4 sub‑groups
LTIFR 0.7
Facility clearance 78 %
Must‑pass 2
Sample questions
• Q‑HSE‑07 LTIFR, TRIR, near‑miss reporting maturity
• Q‑HSE‑13 Emergency response drill frequency
• Q‑HSE‑19 Physical & personnel security clearance for defence work (must‑pass)
Dimension 11 of 12
🇸🇦 Localization Potential
Current Saudi content %, iktva trajectory, roadmap to Vision 2030 target, local sourcing.
Weight
10 %
45 Q · 4 sub‑groups
Portfolio avg 64 %
Target 2030 75 %
Gap ‑ 11 pt
Must‑pass 2
Sample questions
• Q‑LC‑02 Current Saudi content % and roadmap to Vision 2030 target (weight 4.0)
• Q‑LC‑12 Localization simulator inputs (labour, sourcing, R&D)
• Q‑LC‑18 Local supplier development plan & SME onboarding
Dimension 12 of 12 · New in v4.3
🛡 Compliance & Cybersecurity
Regulatory posture, cyber maturity, sanctions screening, data protection, ITAR/EAR controls. Owner: M. George (Cyber Reviewer) · Reviewer: Governance Officer · Board sponsor: CISO.
Weight
8 %
58 questions · 6 sub-groups
Portfolio avg 3.1 / 5
Best Taibah Tech 4.6
Weakest Peninsula 2.1
Must-pass items 7
Evidence types 12
Blocking failures (30 d) 5
ISO 27001 mature
62 %
88 / 142 > 3.5
MFA coverage
94 %
Target ≥ 95 %
Facility clearance
78 %
31 pending renewal
Sanctions hits
1
Under review
Cyber incidents (12 m)
6
0 Sev-1 · 2 Sev-2
Open CAPA
14
4 overdue
6 Sub-groups
| 🔐 Cyber posture (ISO 27001 · NIST CSF) | 14 Q · 2.0 % |
| 🚨 Incident response & SOC readiness | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 📜 Regulatory compliance (ZATCA · GACA · SASO · MODA) | 12 Q · 1.5 % |
| 🚫 Sanctions · UBO · PEP screening | 8 Q · 1.0 % |
| 🗄 Data protection & privacy (PDPL · GDPR-aligned) | 8 Q · 1.0 % |
| 🇺🇸 ITAR / EAR / export controls · facility clearance | 6 Q · 1.0 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Optimised: Certified · SOC 24×7 · zero-trust · continuous audit.
4 – Managed: ISO 27001 certified · SIEM · MFA everywhere.
3 – Defined: Policies documented · quarterly pen-test.
2 – Reactive: Basic controls · manual incident handling.
1 – Ad-hoc: No policies · high sanctions/breach risk.
58 questions in Compliance & Cybersecurity7 must-pass · 22 draft v4.3
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub-group | Type | Weight | Must-pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-CC-01 | ISO 27001 certification current and in scope for defence work? | Cyber posture | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | ISO cert |
| Q-CC-04 | NIST CSF self-assessment score (Identify / Protect / Detect / Respond / Recover) | Cyber posture | Numeric × 5 | 2.5 | — | Self-assessment |
| Q-CC-07 | Multi-factor authentication enforced on MES / ERP / VPN? | Cyber posture | Multi | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | IdP screenshot |
| Q-CC-11 | Mean time to detect (MTTD) and respond (MTTR) — last 12 months | Incident response | Numeric + narrative | 2.0 | — | SOC report |
| Q-CC-14 | Documented incident response plan tested in last 12 months? | Incident response | Multi + upload | 1.5 | ✓ Yes | Tabletop record |
| Q-CC-19 | ZATCA VAT + e-invoicing compliance current? | Regulatory | Multi + upload | 1.5 | ✓ Yes | ZATCA cert |
| Q-CC-22 | GAMI / MODA registration + defence-scope licence | Regulatory | Multi + upload | 2.5 | ✓ Yes | Registration letter |
| Q-CC-28 | Anti-bribery & anti-corruption (ABAC) programme & annual training? | Regulatory | Likert + upload | 1.5 | — | Policy + logs |
| Q-CC-33 | World-Check / OFAC / EU / UN sanctions screening — supplier + UBOs | Sanctions | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | Screening report |
| Q-CC-36 | Ultimate Beneficial Owner disclosure (≥ 10 % stake) with PEP flags | Sanctions | Long text + upload | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | UBO chart |
| Q-CC-41 | Saudi PDPL data-classification schema + DPO appointed? | Data protection | Multi | 1.5 | — | DPO letter |
| Q-CC-46 | Data hosting jurisdiction · in-country residency for classified data | Data protection | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Hosting attestation |
| Q-CC-51 | ITAR / EAR export-control classification of key products | Export controls | Multi + upload | 2.5 | — | ECCN letter |
| Q-CC-55 | Facility Security Clearance level (MODA / GAMI) | Export controls | Multi + upload | 3.0 | ✓ Yes | FSC letter |
Showing 14 of 58 questions in Compliance & CybersecurityPage 1 / 5
Must-pass rules (7)
• Q-CC-01 ISO 27001 valid — fail caps composite at 2.9.
• Q-CC-07 MFA on MES / ERP / VPN — fail blocks Tier 1 award.
• Q-CC-14 IR plan tested < 12 m — fail flags CAPA.
• Q-CC-19 ZATCA current — fail flags governance escalation.
• Q-CC-22 GAMI / MODA licence — fail blocks defence scope.
• Q-CC-33 Sanctions clear — fail = automatic disqualification.
• Q-CC-55 Facility Security Clearance — fail blocks classified programmes.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Optimised8 (6 %)
4 – Managed32 (23 %)
3 – Defined52 (37 %)
2 – Reactive36 (25 %)
1 – Ad-hoc14 (10 %)
Cross-cutting linkages · this dimension feeds…
🚩 Risk Alerts
Rules A1/A4/A7/A8 · 5 fires (7 d)
Rules A1/A4/A7/A8 · 5 fires (7 d)
📮 RFI queue
RFI-198 · ISO 27001 gap
RFI-198 · ISO 27001 gap
🎩 Board pack
Slide 9 (Financial 🔒) · cyber row
Slide 9 (Financial 🔒) · cyber row
📤 Export Studio
T-16 Cyber posture heat · T-17 audit pack
T-16 Cyber posture heat · T-17 audit pack
Dimension 13 of 12 · New in v4.3 · Restricted 🔒
💵 Financial Stability
Going-concern resilience: liquidity, solvency, cash runway, banking relationships, credit ratings, and stress-test scenarios. Complements Financial Health (dim #6) which covers period profitability — this axis measures survival capacity under stress. Owner: F. Al-Dosari 🔒 (Financial Analyst) · Reviewer: CFO office · Board sponsor: Treasurer.
Weight
7 %
46 questions · 6 sub-groups
Portfolio avg 3.3 / 5
Best Al-Salam 4.7
Weakest Tabuk 1.8
Must-pass items 6
Evidence types 14
Distressed suppliers 4
Avg DSCR
1.8×
Threshold ≥ 1.2
DSCR < 1.2
4
Tabuk · Peninsula +2
Avg cash runway
14 mo
Target ≥ 12 mo
Runway < 6 mo
6
Recovery plans active
Rated (S&P / Moody's / Fitch)
38 %
54 of 142
Bank guarantees
SAR 2.1 B
Aggregate exposure
6 Sub-groups
| 💧 Liquidity (current ratio · quick ratio · cash-to-debt) | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 🏛 Solvency (DSCR · debt-to-equity · interest coverage) | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 💰 Cash runway & working-capital cycle | 8 Q · 1.0 % |
| 🏦 Banking relationships & credit-line utilisation | 6 Q · 1.0 % |
| ⭐ External ratings (S&P · Moody's · Fitch · SIMAH) | 6 Q · 1.0 % |
| 🧪 Stress-test resilience (revenue -30 %, delayed payment 90 d) | 6 Q · 1.0 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Fortress: Investment-grade rated · 24 mo runway · zero covenant risk.
4 – Resilient: DSCR > 2× · 18 mo runway · diversified banks.
3 – Stable: DSCR ≥ 1.5× · 12 mo runway · single primary bank.
2 – Stretched: DSCR 1.0-1.2× · 6 mo runway · covenant near-miss.
1 – Distressed: DSCR < 1.0× · < 3 mo runway · going-concern flag.
46 questions in Financial Stability6 must-pass · 18 draft v4.3 · 🔒 Analyst-only
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub-group | Type | Weight | Must-pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-FS-01 | Current ratio (current assets ÷ current liabilities) — last 3 quarters | Liquidity | Numeric × 3 | 2.5 | ✓ Yes | Balance sheet |
| Q-FS-04 | Quick ratio ((current assets − inventory) ÷ current liabilities) | Liquidity | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Balance sheet |
| Q-FS-08 | Cash-to-debt ratio at reporting date | Liquidity | Numeric | 1.5 | — | Bank confirmations |
| Q-FS-11 | Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) — trailing 12 months | Solvency | Numeric | 3.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 1.2 | Audited FS |
| Q-FS-16 | Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA ÷ interest expense) | Solvency | Numeric | 2.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 2.0 | Audited FS |
| Q-FS-19 | Cash runway at current burn rate (months) | Cash runway | Numeric | 2.5 | ✓ Yes ≥ 6 mo | Cash-flow forecast |
| Q-FS-31 | Undrawn committed credit facility (SAR) | Banking | Numeric + upload | 2.0 | ✓ Yes | Facility letter |
| Q-FS-34 | External credit rating (S&P / Moody's / Fitch / SIMAH) | Ratings | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Rating letter |
| Q-FS-38 | Any covenant breach or waiver in last 24 months? | Ratings | Multi + narrative | 2.5 | ✓ No breach | Waiver letter |
| Q-FS-42 | Stress test: DSCR under revenue -30 % scenario | Stress test | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Model output |
| Q-FS-45 | Stress test: cash runway under 90-day customer payment delay | Stress test | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Model output |
Showing 11 of 46 questions in Financial StabilityPage 1 / 4
Must-pass rules (6)
• Q-FS-01 Current ratio ≥ 1.0 all three quarters — fail flags CAPA.
• Q-FS-11 DSCR ≥ 1.2× — fail caps composite at 2.9 (rule A4).
• Q-FS-16 Interest coverage ≥ 2.0× — fail flags Treasury review.
• Q-FS-19 Cash runway ≥ 6 months — fail triggers 90-day recovery plan.
• Q-FS-31 Undrawn committed facility > 5 % annual revenue — fail flags Watch tier.
• Q-FS-38 No covenant breach in 24 m — fail = automatic Watchlist.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Fortress12 (8 %)
4 – Resilient38 (27 %)
3 – Stable58 (41 %)
2 – Stretched30 (21 %)
1 – Distressed4 (3 %)
Portfolio stress-test snapshot · Aug 12, 2026
| Scenario | Suppliers still ≥ Stable | Slip to Stretched | Slip to Distressed | SAR exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (today) | 108 (76 %) | 30 (21 %) | 4 (3 %) | SAR 84 M at risk |
| Revenue -20 % | 86 (61 %) | 44 (31 %) | 12 (8 %) | SAR 214 M at risk |
| Revenue -30 % + 90-day payment delay | 62 (44 %) | 54 (38 %) | 26 (18 %) | SAR 512 M at risk |
| SAIBOR +200 bps · rate shock | 94 (66 %) | 36 (25 %) | 12 (8 %) | SAR 168 M at risk |
Cross-cutting linkages · this dimension feeds…
🚩 Risk Alerts
Rule A4 (DSCR) · 4 fires (30 d)
Rule A4 (DSCR) · 4 fires (30 d)
💰 Financial Health (dim #6)
Paired — profitability × survival
Paired — profitability × survival
🎩 Board pack
Slide 9 · treasurer exposure view
Slide 9 · treasurer exposure view
📤 Export Studio
T-13 Financial risk register 🔒 · T-15 escrow tracker
T-13 Financial risk register 🔒 · T-15 escrow tracker
Dimension 14 of 12 · New in v4.3
🚀 Innovation & R&D
Technology pipeline, R&D spend intensity, patent portfolio, open innovation, JV / co-development, and time-to-market. Distinct from Technical Capability (dim #2) which measures today's engineering depth — this axis measures tomorrow's disruptive capacity and Vision 2030 innovation contribution. Owner: R. Al-Otaibi (Innovation Lead) · Reviewer: CTO office · Board sponsor: Chief Innovation Officer.
Weight
8 %
52 questions · 6 sub-groups
Portfolio avg 3.0 / 5
Best Taibah Tech 4.8
Weakest Al-Rajhi Steel 1.6
Must-pass items 3
Evidence types 10
Patents filed (portfolio) 384
Avg R&D intensity
4.2 %
Of revenue · target ≥ 5 %
R&D ≥ 5 %
42
Of 142 suppliers
Patents filed 24 m
128
+34 vs prior 24 m
Avg TRL of pipeline
6.2
Target ≥ 7 (mature)
Active JV / co-dev
28
Univ · industry · gov labs
No R&D activity
18
Innovation-gap flag
6 Sub-groups
| 💰 R&D spend intensity & multi-year budget | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 📜 Patent portfolio · IP strategy · exclusive licences | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 🧪 Technology pipeline (TRL 3-9) & roadmap discipline | 10 Q · 1.5 % |
| 🤝 Open innovation · JVs · consortium participation | 8 Q · 1.5 % |
| 🎓 University / national lab partnerships (KAUST · KFUPM · KACST) | 8 Q · 1.0 % |
| ⚡ Time-to-market · idea-to-serial cycle time | 6 Q · 1.0 % |
Maturity ladder
5 – Category-defining: Sets industry standard · > 10 % R&D · deep IP moat.
4 – Innovator: 6-10 % R&D · active patents · TRL 8-9 pipeline.
3 – Fast follower: 3-5 % R&D · selective JVs · TRL 6-7.
2 – Adopter: < 3 % R&D · licence-in strategy · TRL 5.
1 – Static: No R&D · no patents · buys off-the-shelf.
52 questions in Innovation & R&D3 must-pass · 20 draft v4.3
| ID | Question (EN) | Sub-group | Type | Weight | Must-pass | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-IN-01 | R&D spend as % of revenue — last 3 fiscal years | R&D spend | Numeric × 3 | 3.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 2 % | Audited FS · R&D note |
| Q-IN-07 | R&D headcount & PhD ratio (engineers / scientists) | R&D spend | Numeric × 2 | 1.5 | — | HR roster |
| Q-IN-11 | Active patents held (granted + pending) — global & Saudi | Patents / IP | Numeric + upload | 2.5 | — | Patent register |
| Q-IN-14 | Patents filed in last 24 months with jurisdiction map | Patents / IP | Numeric + upload | 2.0 | — | Filing receipts |
| Q-IN-21 | Technology pipeline count by TRL (3-4-5-6-7-8-9) | Pipeline | Numeric × 7 | 2.5 | ✓ Yes ≥ 1 at TRL 6+ | Pipeline register |
| Q-IN-24 | Formal stage-gate roadmap discipline (idea → serial) | Pipeline | Likert + upload | 2.0 | — | Roadmap doc |
| Q-IN-28 | Active JV / co-development agreements — count & SAR value | Open innovation | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | Contract register |
| Q-IN-35 | University partnerships (KAUST · KFUPM · KACST · Prince Sultan) count & scope | Academia | Multi + upload | 2.0 | — | MoUs · project list |
| Q-IN-46 | Idea-to-serial cycle time (months) — average of last 5 launches | Time-to-market | Numeric | 2.0 | — | Launch dossier |
| Q-IN-49 | % revenue from products < 5 years old (Vintage index) | Time-to-market | Numeric | 2.0 | ✓ Yes ≥ 20 % | Revenue mix |
Showing 10 of 52 questions in Innovation & R&DPage 1 / 4
Must-pass rules (3)
• Q-IN-01 R&D spend ≥ 2 % of revenue — fail flags Innovation Gap CAPA.
• Q-IN-21 At least 1 pipeline item at TRL 6+ — fail blocks Tier 1 award.
• Q-IN-49 Revenue from products < 5 y old ≥ 20 % — fail flags portfolio ageing.
Score distribution (142 suppliers)
5 – Category-defining6 (4 %)
4 – Innovator28 (20 %)
3 – Fast follower50 (35 %)
2 – Adopter40 (28 %)
1 – Static18 (13 %)
Portfolio innovation snapshot · Aug 12, 2026
| Sector | Avg score | R&D intensity | Patents 24 m | Active JVs | Vintage index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerostructures | 3.6 | 5.4 % | 42 | 9 | 28 % |
| C4I & Avionics | 4.1 | 8.2 % | 58 | 11 | 44 % |
| Munitions & Weapons | 2.7 | 2.8 % | 14 | 3 | 12 % |
| Land Systems | 2.4 | 1.9 % | 8 | 2 | 9 % |
| Naval | 2.6 | 2.4 % | 6 | 3 | 11 % |
Cross-cutting linkages · this dimension feeds…
🎯 Technical Capability (dim #2)
Paired — today vs tomorrow depth
Paired — today vs tomorrow depth
🇸🇦 Localization (dim #11)
Feeds R&D localisation index
Feeds R&D localisation index
🎩 Board pack
Slide 6 · innovation pipeline view
Slide 6 · innovation pipeline view
📤 Export Studio
T-11 JV readiness · T-20 Vision 2030 sector pack
T-11 JV readiness · T-20 Vision 2030 sector pack
Core Template
EVO Full 11‑Dimension
542 questions · avg 21 d · used by 88 suppliers
DEFAULTEN + AR
Fast‑Track
Tier 1 Shortlist Screen
148 questions · avg 9 d · 21 Tier 1 suppliers
EN + AR
Re‑assess
Annual Re‑certification
102 questions · avg 6 d · 34 approved suppliers
EN + AR
Financial Only
Financial Health Deep Dive
62 questions · Financial Analyst role
ROLE‑GATED
Site Visit
On‑site Verification Kit
88 items · mobile‑ready · geo‑tagged
MOBILE
Modules × 12
15 Technology Modules
Aerostructures, Munitions, C4I, Optics, Naval, Avionics…
15 ACTIVE
| Rule | Trigger | Action | Applies to | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R‑01 | Q‑QM‑03 = “Not certified” | Skip AS9100 sub‑branch, auto‑score 0 for QM | Quality | Team Lead | Active |
| R‑02 | Q‑FH‑05 EBITDA < 0 | Force Financial Distress flag, notify Risk owner | Financial | Fin. Analyst | Active |
| R‑03 | Q‑LC‑02 Saudi content < 40 % | Require roadmap + iktva simulator run | Localization | Team Lead | Active |
| R‑04 | Q‑GC‑11 no ISO 27001 | Trigger cyber sub‑module (12 questions) | Governance | Cyber Rev. | Active |
| R‑05 | Any Must‑pass failed | Block award, open Risk Alert, notify Board | All | Sys Admin | Active |
| R‑06 | Q‑TC‑18 additive = Yes | Add Advanced Manufacturing module (24 Q) | Technical | Tech Asr. | Draft |
| Version | Published | Author | Questions | Changes | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v4.3 | — draft | A. Al‑Shehri | 560 | +22 questions, +6 conditional rules, refresh Cyber & Additive | DRAFT |
| v4.2 | Jul 28, 2026 | A. Al‑Shehri | 542 | +38 questions on Localization, HSE and Supply Chain | LIVE |
| v4.1 | Apr 12, 2026 | A. Al‑Shehri | 516 | Rebalanced weights, added Vision 2030 pillars | ARCHIVED |
| v4.0 | Jan 08, 2026 | M. George | 498 | Major overhaul — 11 dimensions locked | ARCHIVED |
| v3.4 | Oct 15, 2025 | M. George | 432 | Baseline before EVO relaunch | ARCHIVED |
EN ↔ AR translation status
12 items pending AR review · target Aug 20, 2026
Coverage by dimension
Technical100 %
Manufacturing100 %
Quality100 %
Financial97 % (2 pending)
Governance92 % (4 pending)
Localization96 % (3 pending)
HSE94 % (3 pending)
Translation workflow
New EN drafts22
AR machine‑translated18
AR reviewer approved6
Legal / terminology QA4
Ready to publish4
Blocked / clarify2
Documents & Vault Suppliers view
Central evidence library · OCR indexed · Bilingual EN / AR · Last sync Aug 08, 2026 04:12 UTC
📄 Drag & drop files here, paste from clipboard, or bulk import a ZIP. Auto detects doc type from filename and OCR.
Documents indexed
3,847
across 142 suppliers
This cycle (Q3)
612
+184 vs Q2
OCR queue
28
avg 42s wait
Expiring ≤ 30 d
17
9 ISO · 5 CR · 3 iktva
Missing mandatory
41
across 19 suppliers
Storage used
48/ 200 GB
24% of quota
Coverage Heatmap Top 10 in-cycle suppliers · 12 mandatory doc types
| Supplier | CR | VAT | Fin. | ISO 9001 | AS9100 | NADCAP | HSE | Org | Cap. | iktva | Nitaqat | Cyber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wahaj Defense Ind. | v3 | v1 | v2 | v1 | — | n/a | rev | v1 | v1 | exp | v1 | rev |
| Taibah Arms Mfg. | v2 | v1 | v3 | v2 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 |
| Al-Salam Aerospace | v4 | v2 | v3 | v2 | v2 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 |
| Faisal Aero Mfg. | v2 | v1 | v2 | v1 | rev | n/a | v1 | v1 | rev | v1 | v1 | — |
| NADIA Defence Sys. | v3 | v1 | v2 | v2 | n/a | n/a | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v1 | v2 |
| Sahara Dynamics | v2 | v1 | rev | v1 | — | n/a | rev | v1 | v1 | rev | v1 | — |
| Jubail Marine Works | v1 | v1 | — | exp | n/a | n/a | rev | v1 | — | — | v1 | — |
| Al-Ahsa Precision | v2 | v1 | rev | v1 | — | n/a | v1 | v1 | rev | v1 | v1 | rev |
| Riyadh Electronics | v1 | exp | — | exp | n/a | n/a | — | rev | — | — | v1 | — |
| Al-Hijra Startup | v1 | — | — | — | n/a | n/a | — | — | — | — | v1 | — |
Verified
In review
Expired
Missing
Not applicable
Certification Tracker Next 90 days · auto alerts at 90/60/30/7 d
Riyadh Electronics · ISO 9001:2015
Issued 2020-08-14 · by BSI KSA
Expired 4 d
Wahaj Defense · iktva declaration
Filed 2025-08-01 · GAMI
Expires 7 d
Jubail Marine · ISO 9001
Issued 2023-09-15 · TUV Rheinland
Expires 22 d
Sahara Dynamics · HSE certificate
Issued 2023-09-30 · SASO
Expires 38 d
Al-Ahsa Precision · Nitaqat report
HRSD quarterly filing
Expires 54 d
Faisal Aero · AS9100 Rev D
Issued 2023-11-02 · SGS
Expires 68 d
NADIA Defence Sys. · ISO 27001
Issued 2024-01-20 · DNV
Expires 82 d
Escalations sent: 6
View all 42 ›
Document Browser Showing 1–10 of 3,847 documents · all suppliers · all types
🔍 Search filename, supplier, doc type, OCR text…
≡ Table
▣ Tiles
🗂 Tree
Cycle: 2026 Q3 ✕
Status: Verified + In review ✕
Confidentiality: any ✕
+ 11 more filter fields available
| Document | Supplier | Doc type | Dimension | Ver. | Uploaded | Expiry | Size | OCR | Status | Conf. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDF CR-1010293847-Wahaj-v3.pdf EN · uploaded by supplier portal |
Wahaj Defense Ind. | Commercial Registration | Governance | v3 | Aug 06, 2026 | 2027-06-30 | 1.2 MB | ✓ 98% | Verified | Restricted | |
XLS Taibah-Audited-Fin-2023-2025.xlsx EN · uploaded by N. Al-Qahtani |
Taibah Arms Mfg. | Audited financials (3 y) | Financial Health | v3 | Jul 30, 2026 | — | 4.8 MB | ✓ 96% | Verified | Confidential | |
PDF Al-Salam-AS9100D-cert.pdf EN · issued by SGS |
Al-Salam Aerospace | AS9100 Rev D certificate | Quality Management | v2 | Jul 28, 2026 | 2027-11-02 | 860 KB | ✓ 99% | Verified | Internal | |
DOC NADIA-Cyber-Policy-2026.docx EN + AR · uploaded by supplier |
NADIA Defence Sys. | Cyber & ISO 27001 policy | Governance & Compliance | v2 | Jul 24, 2026 | 2027-01-20 | 420 KB | ✓ 94% | Verified | Restricted | |
IMG Sahara-facility-tour-photos.zip Geotagged · 18 photos · mobile app |
Sahara Dynamics | Facility layout / photos | Manufacturing Capability | v1 | Jul 22, 2026 | — | 62 MB | Queue | In review | Internal | |
PDF Faisal-Aero-iktva-declaration.pdf EN · GAMI stamped |
Faisal Aero Mfg. | iktva localization declaration | Localization Potential | v1 | Jul 20, 2026 | 2027-07-19 | 380 KB | 78% | In review | Restricted | |
PDF Jubail-Marine-ISO9001-2023.pdf EN · TUV Rheinland |
Jubail Marine Works | ISO 9001:2015 certificate | Quality Management | v1 | Sep 20, 2023 | 2026-09-15 | 920 KB | ✓ 97% | Expiring 22 d | Internal | |
DOC Al-Ahsa-Nitaqat-Q2-2026.docx EN + AR · HRSD portal export |
Al-Ahsa Precision | Saudization (Nitaqat) report | Workforce & Organization | v2 | Jul 12, 2026 | 2026-10-01 | 240 KB | ✓ 93% | In review | Internal | |
PDF Riyadh-Electronics-VAT-cert.pdf EN · ZATCA |
Riyadh Electronics | VAT / ZATCA certificate | Governance & Compliance | v1 | Apr 10, 2025 | 2026-08-04 | 180 KB | ✓ 99% | Expired 4 d | Restricted | |
PDF Al-Hijra-ArticlesOfAssociation.pdf AR · uploaded by portal |
Al-Hijra Startup | Articles of association | Governance | v1 | Jul 28, 2026 | — | 1.6 MB | 72% | Rejected · re-upload | Restricted |
Rows per page: 10 · Showing 1–10 of 3,847
…
Supplier Cockpit Portfolio view
All suppliers on EVO · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Last refresh: Aug 08, 2026 · 14:22 AST
🔍 Search by supplier name, CR number, or CEO…
Total Suppliers
142
▲ 18 this quarter
In Active Cycle
89
Cycle 2026 Q3
Avg Progress
64%
▲ 8 pts w/w
Awaiting Review
12
▲ 3 vs last week
Overdue
7
SLA breached
Avg Maturity
2.7/ 5
Cohort of 89
By Sector Portfolio share
142
Suppliers
Avionics & Electronics38 · 27%
Land Systems29 · 20%
Munitions & Weapons25 · 18%
Aerostructures20 · 14%
Naval & Marine17 · 12%
C4I & Cyber13 · 9%
Assessment Funnel Cycle 2026 Q3
Invited
142
Questionnaire
125
Documents
102
Site visit
74
Scoring
50
Review
34
Approved
23
Overall conversion16.2% · SLA 20%
Maturity Distribution click bar to filter
31.0
91.5
112.0
182.5
213.0
143.5
94.0
44.5+
Median2.7
Shortlist ready (≥3.0)48
Must-pass clean64 · 72%
1 must-pass gap18 · 20%
≥2 must-pass gaps7 · 8%
Supplier Portfolio Showing 1–10 of 142 · Cycle 2026 Q3 · Active
Cycle 2026 Q3 ✕ Active ✕
| Supplier | Sector | Module | Progress | Stage | Must-pass | Maturity | Next milestone | Owner | Last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WD Wahaj Defense Ind. CR 1010445621 · Riyadh | Avionics | Wire harness | 64% | Site visit | 7 / 8 | 2.8 / 5 | Site visit · Aug 22 | A. Al-Dosari | 1 d ago | |
TA Taibah Arms Mfg. CR 4030173821 · Al-Kharj | Munitions | Sheet metal | 100% | Approved T1 | 8 / 8 | 3.6 / 5 | Tier 1 · Jul 30 | N. Farsi | 9 d ago | |
SA Al-Salam Aerospace CR 1010115498 · Riyadh | Aerostructures | Composites | 98% | Approved T1 | 8 / 8 | 4.0 / 5 | Tier 1 · Aug 05 | N. Farsi | 4 d ago | |
FA Faisal Aero Mfg. CR 2050173201 · Dammam | Aerostructures | Avionics Elec. | 96% | Review | 8 / 8 | 3.4 / 5 | Approval · Aug 12 | N. Farsi | 2 h ago | |
NS NADIA Defence Sys. CR 1010887321 · Riyadh | C4I & Cyber | Avionics Elec. | 85% | Scoring | 8 / 8 | 3.1 / 5 | Sign-off · Aug 15 | A. Al-Dosari | 6 h ago | |
SD Sahara Dynamics CR 2050334219 · Dammam | Land Systems | Hydraulics | 88% | Scoring | 8 / 8 | 3.2 / 5 | Sign-off · Aug 14 | M. Al-Zahrani | 8 h ago | |
JM Jubail Marine Works CR 2055661188 · Jubail | Naval & Marine | Machining | 58% | Documents | 7 / 8 | 2.6 / 5 | Doc upload · Aug 11 | H. Al-Qahtani | 2 d ago | |
AP Al-Ahsa Precision CR 2735112288 · Al Ahsa | Land Systems | CNC machining | 62% | Site visit | 7 / 8 | 2.6 / 5 | Site visit · Aug 24 | M. Al-Zahrani | 1 d ago | |
RE Riyadh Electronics CR 1010067231 · Riyadh | Avionics | PCB assembly | 41% | Questionnaire | 5 / 8 | 2.2 / 5 | Overdue · Aug 05 | A. Al-Dosari | 4 d ago | |
AH Al-Hijra Startup CR 1010334455 · Riyadh | C4I & Cyber | Software dev. | 12% | Questionnaire | 3 / 8 | 1.0 / 5 | Overdue · Jul 28 | A. Al-Dosari | 12 d ago |
Rows per page: 10 · Showing 1–10 of 142
…
Cost Savings Board viewVision 2030
Savings by Category
Savings vs Target Monthly cumulative
Savings by Sector Stacked by category
CS1 Localization
CS2 Sourcing
CS3 Dev. ROI
CS4 Consolidation
Top 10 Savings Contributors
| Initiative / Supplier | Category | SAR M | Status |
|---|